Speaking aboard Air Force One, President Trump suggested revoking the licenses of broadcast television networks critical of him. This followed ABC’s suspension of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” due to the host’s comments. Trump referenced negative media coverage, particularly from Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, asserting these networks are biased. He deferred to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, emphasizing his patriotism and hinting at potential action regarding network licenses.
Read More
Jimmy Kimmel Has Supreme Court Precedent on His Side, or at Least, He Did
Jimmy Kimmel has Supreme Court precedent on his side, specifically referencing the 1963 case *Bantam Books v. Sullivan*. This pivotal ruling established a clear boundary: governmental entities cannot employ indirect methods to suppress constitutionally protected speech. The core of this precedent rests on the idea that the government cannot coerce or intimidate private parties into censoring others. The key question is whether the government official’s actions could reasonably be understood as a threat of adverse consequences aimed at coercing a private party to punish or suppress someone else’s speech on the government’s behalf.… Continue reading
Initially, senior ABC executives expressed support for Jimmy Kimmel, but this stance shifted dramatically leading to the show’s removal. Reports indicate that intense meetings occurred, with executives reportedly concerned about potential backlash from former President Donald Trump following Kimmel’s comments. The FCC Chairman’s warning about withdrawing ABC’s broadcasting license, due to Kimmel’s remarks on a right-wing activist, prompted Nexstar, which owns several ABC affiliates, to pull the show. This decision was celebrated by Trump, who has previously been at odds with Kimmel.
Read More
Nexstar and Sinclair, two major TV station owners, pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s show due to his jokes about the killing of a police officer, citing “insensitive” comments. Both companies have significant business pending before the Trump administration and are seeking mergers that would expand their reach. Media analysts suggest these decisions were made to curry favor with the administration, especially given the timing and the need for regulatory approvals. This, according to Stelter, is an obvious conclusion considering the circumstances.
Read More
Democratic lawmakers are demanding FCC Chair Brendan Carr’s resignation, accusing him of abusing his power by pressuring ABC network regarding Jimmy Kimmel’s show. This pressure allegedly preceded the show’s indefinite hiatus. Adding to the controversy, former President Barack Obama voiced his disapproval through a social media statement, further amplifying the criticism.
Read More
The article contends that the cancellation of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” is a symptom of a broader threat to free speech and democracy. Kimmel’s remarks about the politicization of Charlie Kirk’s death were met with criticism from the right, but were quickly defended by the host himself, and were not deemed to be offensive. However, in response, the FCC and media conglomerates like Disney and Nexstar seemingly colluded to silence Kimmel, citing unprecedented threats from FCC chairman Brandon Carr. These actions, including the preemptive suspension of Kimmel’s show, are seen as a strategic move by media companies to appease the FCC and maintain business interests, especially given pending regulatory approvals. The author views this as a dangerous precedent, representing the further erosion of free speech and the suppression of dissenting voices.
Read More
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened to revoke ABC’s broadcasting license in response to a Jimmy Kimmel joke about the suspected shooter of Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson. Carr accused Kimmel of spreading misinformation by playing into a narrative that Robinson was a “MAGA or Republican motivated person”. Carr suggested that if Disney and ABC did not take action against Kimmel, the FCC would intervene, citing their obligation to operate in the public interest. Legal experts and FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez have since condemned Carr’s statements, noting the FCC lacks the authority to control content and that such actions could suppress free speech.
Read More
FCC Chair Brendan Carr is facing criticism for appearing to threaten ABC’s broadcast licenses over Jimmy Kimmel’s monologue about the Charlie Kirk shooting. Carr called Kimmel’s comments, which linked the suspected shooter to MAGA Republicans, “the sickest conduct possible” and suggested potential FCC actions, including suspension or license revocation. Carr’s statements sparked controversy within the FCC itself, with Commissioner Anna Gomez criticizing the Chair’s threats as an attempt to suppress lawful expression. ABC and Kimmel have not yet commented on the matter.
Read More
President Donald Trump has publicly called ABC and NBC “the worst and most biased networks in history,” suggesting the FCC should revoke their licenses. This follows a pattern from Trump’s first term, where he frequently criticized media outlets using the term “fake news.” Trump’s remarks have sparked concerns within the industry about potential challenges to truthful reporting and access. The president’s recent actions indicate a continuation of the adversarial relationship between Trump and the media, especially as the midterm elections draw nearer.
Read More
Advocacy groups have decided against appealing a court decision that struck down the Biden administration’s net neutrality rules. The groups cited concerns about the conservative majority in the Supreme Court and the current FCC, which opposes net neutrality. The legal battle centered on the FCC’s ability to classify broadband as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act, a key step for implementing common-carrier regulations. These regulations, originally established during the Obama era, prohibited practices like blocking or throttling content and paid prioritization.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood