Investigative reporter Jason Leopold reported that the FBI spent over $850,000 in overtime pay to process and redact files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This information was revealed in documents released by the FBI in response to a civil lawsuit. The documents showed 934 agents worked over 14,000 hours on the project, which was part of the “Epstein Transparency Project 2025.” While the documents confirm significant overtime pay, they do not offer evidence that the redactions were specifically to remove Donald Trump’s name or solely for “redaction training.”
Read More
Following the release of an email, former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is facing scrutiny regarding his involvement in the redaction of Jeffrey Epstein files. The email, sent on his second day in office, indicates he was aware of the redaction process, contradicting his prior public stance demanding the unredacted release of the files. Internal documents reveal the bureau spent nearly a million dollars in overtime on redaction efforts during the Trump administration, with the stated goal of protecting victims. While Bongino initially expressed support for the redactions, he has since been reportedly critical of the DOJ’s decision to halt further releases, leading to strained relationships within the administration.
Read More
Following the release of unredacted files by the House Oversight Committee, several Jeffrey Epstein survivors experienced significant distress and media attention, as outlined in a court filing this week. Lawyers representing hundreds of Epstein victims reported being contacted by survivors whose identities were exposed, expressing confusion and dismay over the lack of privacy protection. The lawyers specifically cited instances where the Department of Justice appeared to have failed to redact victims’ names in documents provided to the committee. Consequently, the judge ordered the DOJ to clarify its handling of the materials and detail its plan for protecting survivor privacy by December 1st.
Read More
The Supreme Court is currently reviewing cases concerning presidential power and the separation of powers. One case involves Perlmutter, who argues her position within the Library of Congress made her part of the legislative branch, thus protecting her from being fired by the executive branch. The court is also considering cases of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, both of whom have had their removal challenged. The court allowed Trump to remove Slaughter, and Cook’s case will be heard in January.
Read More
Newly released emails reveal the FBI’s “Special Redaction Project,” a costly initiative driven by political pressure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. President Trump’s administration, particularly under Attorney General Pam Bondi, pushed for the release of these documents, fueling a conspiracy theory about Epstein’s connections. The project involved a significant investment in overtime, with agents undergoing crash-course training to redact materials, including surveillance footage and records related to Epstein’s death. Ultimately, the Epstein Files Transparency Act compelled the DOJ to release the files, allowing for redactions to protect ongoing investigations and victim privacy.
Read More
The House overwhelmingly passed legislation to release previously sealed Epstein files, with the Senate granting unanimous consent. These files encompass materials from criminal investigations, including witness interviews, seized items, internal communications, flight logs, and connections to Epstein. This release is distinct from documents released the previous week, some of which mentioned Donald Trump, who has denied any wrongdoing in connection to Epstein. The family of Virginia Giuffre has expressed that the bill’s signing is “monumental” for survivors.
Read More
President Donald Trump signed a bill requiring the Justice Department to release Jeffrey Epstein-related files, marking the end of a bipartisan push that initially faced resistance. Despite signing the bill, Trump continued to label the effort a “hoax” while also directing the Justice Department to investigate Epstein’s connections to Democrats. The legislation, which passed with overwhelming support in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate, mandates the release of unclassified records within 30 days, though redactions are permitted. This action has caused divisions within the Republican Party and among Trump supporters.
Read More
US Justice Department will release Epstein files within 30 days, Bondi says. Well, that’s what’s being reported, isn’t it? It seems like a pretty bold statement, considering the history of this whole situation. The implication is a trove of documents – the “Epstein files” – will be made public within the next month. But, honestly, a lot of us are approaching this with a hefty dose of skepticism, and that’s understandable.
US Justice Department will release Epstein files within 30 days, Bondi says, yet there’s a real question of what “release” actually means. It’s hard not to immediately think about the potential for redactions.… Continue reading
The Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates the release of Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein, is poised to become law after both the House and Senate voted in favor. The bill, requiring Attorney General Pam Bondi to publicly release all Epstein-related documents within 30 days, has sparked concerns regarding potential redactions. Specifically, the legislation allows Bondi to redact certain sensitive information, such as details that could compromise ongoing investigations. The Justice Department has been contacted for comment.
Read More
President Trump, in a reversal of his previous stance, urged House Republicans to release the remaining Jeffrey Epstein files, stating the party had nothing to hide. This shift followed the completion of a discharge petition to force the Justice Department to release the files, and the House had previously voted on the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Trump’s change of heart comes after the House Oversight Committee released thousands of documents, and emails within those documents suggested he may have had more detailed knowledge of Epstein’s activities than previously claimed. Trump’s plea to release the files was an attempt to redirect focus toward Republican achievements.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood