The gunman who attempted to storm the White House Correspondents’ Association event intended to spare FBI Director Kash Patel. In a manifesto sent to his family, the assailant, identified as Cole Thomas Allen, outlined his plan to assassinate Donald Trump and his top administration officials, with Patel being the sole exception. While the specific reasoning for this exception remains unclear, the document detailed Allen’s motivations, citing a perceived need to address crimes and traitors. Allen also stated his intention to minimize casualties, targeting only Secret Service agents if necessary and avoiding other law enforcement unless provoked.
Read More
According to a White House official, FBI Director Kash Patel is reportedly close to being dismissed from his post due to a series of negative and distracting headlines. Recent reports have highlighted alleged erratic behavior, excessive drinking, and a focus on optics rather than serious work, leading to concerns about national security implications. Despite Patel’s furious denial of these accusations and a subsequent defamation lawsuit, further negative press, including an alleged attempt to investigate a reporter and disclosure of past alcohol-related arrests, has continued to surface. This situation arises as President Trump reportedly seeks to shake up his Cabinet to improve public perception ahead of upcoming elections.
Read More
Following a shooting incident near President Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, FBI Director Kash Patel was observed lingering outside the venue and later being escorted from the building. Videos circulated online showing Patel appearing visibly stunned amidst the chaos. The FBI has confirmed that the bureau is actively investigating the incident, which involved a gunman reportedly targeting administration officials. This event has drawn renewed scrutiny to Patel, who has faced criticism in the past for his conduct during high-profile investigations.
Read More
Since the publication of a report detailing alleged excessive drinking and unexplained absences by FBI Director Kash Patel, The Atlantic has received an influx of additional sources corroborating the claims, even from high government levels. The journalist behind the report believes that Patel’s vindictive nature, coupled with a fear of retribution including job loss and costly litigation, has historically prevented others from speaking out. Despite Patel’s $250 million lawsuit alleging fabricated claims, The Atlantic stands by its reporting, which was based on interviews with dozens of individuals across various government and intelligence agencies.
Read More
President Donald Trump continues to support FBI Director Kash Patel amidst allegations of public intoxication and troubling behavior. Documents revealed Patel’s past arrests for public intoxication and urination, which he explained as anomalies in his youth. Despite The Atlantic’s report detailing concerns about his drinking, Patel has vehemently denied the claims and filed a lawsuit against the magazine, while the White House maintains Trump’s confidence in his leadership.
Read More
Governor DeSantis has controversially redrawn Florida’s congressional districts through a secretive process, bypassing state legislators and refusing public access to the maps. This closed-door approach is designed to frustrate legal challenges, as it hinders plaintiffs’ ability to access records and prove intent. Furthermore, by claiming executive privilege and utilizing the “apex doctrine,” DeSantis can shield his staff from depositions and strategically delay court proceedings, potentially leveraging the “Purcell principle” to ensure his maps are implemented before the upcoming elections.
Read More
As part of his personnel file from the Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office, FBI Director Kash Patel disclosed two past arrests involving alcohol: one for public intoxication as a college student and another for public urination after consuming alcoholic beverages. These incidents, which occurred in 2001 and 2005 respectively, are being highlighted as prior instances where Patel’s alcohol use faced scrutiny. Despite these past events, a spokesperson stated that Patel’s background was thoroughly vetted before he assumed his current role, dismissing current criticisms as an attempt to undermine his leadership. Patel himself has denied recent allegations of being intoxicated on the job, labeling them as fabricated and initiating a defamation lawsuit.
Read More
Investigative journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick stands by her article alleging impropriety by FBI Director Kash Patel, stating she has received numerous corroborating messages from high-level government sources. These sources, reportedly concerned about national security vulnerabilities, have provided additional information supporting the original claims of excessive drinking and paranoia. Despite Patel’s denial and a $250 million defamation lawsuit, Fitzpatrick maintains the reporting was diligent and that the article revealed an “open secret” known throughout the Justice Department and White House.
Read More
In Patel v. Figliuzzi, the court determined that the statement, “he’s been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover building,” did not constitute actionable defamation. This conclusion was reached because the statement was deemed to be “rhetorical hyperbole,” an extravagant exaggeration employed for rhetorical effect. Texas law protects such statements, as they cannot reasonably be interpreted as asserting actual facts about an individual. Therefore, a reasonable person would not perceive the remark as a literal claim about the FBI Director’s time allocation between nightclubs and his office.
Read More
A federal judge in Texas has dismissed FBI Director Kash Patel’s defamation lawsuit against former FBI assistant director Frank Figliuzzi. The judge ruled that Figliuzzi’s on-air comment about Patel’s nightclub attendance versus his office presence was rhetorical hyperbole and could not be perceived as stating actual facts by a reasonable person. This decision was viewed as a victory for press freedom, though Figliuzzi’s request for attorney fees was denied. The ruling comes as Patel has filed another defamation suit against The Atlantic magazine regarding similar allegations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker