A California judge has ruled that Kars4Kids ads constitute false advertising, prohibiting the charity’s current broadcasts in the state. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by a donor who felt misled by the advertisement’s portrayal of the charity’s mission. The court found that the organization’s ads concealed its primary religious and geographic focus, as funds are primarily funneled to Oorah, a Jewish non-profit. Future advertisements in California must disclose Kars4Kids’ religious affiliation and geographic scope, and are prohibited from featuring prepubescent children.
Read More
Nearly 600,000 supporters paid a £74 deposit for a gold smartphone, the Trump Mobile T1, which was promised with a ‘Made in the USA’ build and initial delivery in late summer 2025. This deadline repeatedly slipped, and by April 2026, the company’s updated terms of service revealed that deposits did not constitute a completed purchase and were unlikely to be refunded unless the project was explicitly canceled, stripping buyers of guarantees. Furthermore, the ‘Made in the USA’ claim was revealed to be misleading, with final assembly occurring in Miami but bulk production overseas, leading to calls for an FTC investigation into potential bait-and-switch tactics and false advertising.
Read More
A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in California alleges Costco has misled customers by advertising its rotisserie chickens as containing “no preservatives.” The lawsuit claims Costco uses ingredients like sodium phosphate and carrageenan, which extend shelf life and maintain texture, contradicting the “no preservatives” claim. While these ingredients are approved and considered safe, the plaintiffs argue it is unlawful and misleading advertising. Costco has since removed “no preservatives” references from its labeling and signage, stating the ingredients are used for moisture retention and texture consistency.
Read More
Donald Trump amended his lawsuit against CBS, increasing his damage claim to $20 billion and adding a claim of unfair competition, alleging deceptive editing of a Kamala Harris interview cost his media company viewership and revenue. The amended complaint, filed in Texas federal court, now includes Representative Ronny Jackson as a plaintiff to address forum-shopping arguments. Trump claims CBS’s edits constituted false advertising under both state and federal law, impacting Truth Social engagement. CBS maintains that the edits were for time constraints and that the lawsuit is an attack on editorial judgment protected by the First Amendment.
Read More
I’m absolutely flabbergasted by the recent ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court regarding boneless chicken wings. It seems that in Ohio, boneless no longer means boneless. According to the court, the term “boneless wings” simply refers to a cooking style, and consumers should not expect these tasty treats to actually be free of bones. This decision comes in response to a lawsuit from a man who suffered serious medical complications after ingesting a bone from his so-called boneless wing.
As someone who enjoys indulging in a plate of boneless wings, this ruling has me scratching my head. When I order boneless wings, I expect them to be just that – devoid of any bones.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker