President Biden strongly criticized Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to replace Facebook’s fact-checking program with community-moderated notes, deeming it “shameful” and contrary to American justice. Zuckerberg justified the change by citing declining public trust in Facebook’s fact-checking efforts and a perceived shift towards prioritizing free speech. This dispute arises amidst Zuckerberg’s reported contributions to the incoming Trump administration and accusations of White House pressure to remove certain content, which Zuckerberg claims included factual information. Biden’s criticism underscores the escalating concerns over misinformation and the role of social media platforms in shaping public discourse.
Read More
Australia’s government expressed serious concern over Meta’s termination of US fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram. Treasurer Jim Chalmers highlighted the potential for increased online misinformation as a direct result of this decision. This action by Meta contradicts ongoing government efforts to regulate social media companies and control the spread of false information. The government is worried about the subsequent surge in disinformation.
Read More
Mark Zuckerberg’s interview with Joe Rogan was riddled with inaccuracies and omissions. Zuckerberg falsely claimed limitations on the First Amendment and downplayed Facebook’s role in spreading misinformation, particularly during the 2016 and 2020 elections. He deflected criticism by blaming government pressure, while ignoring the significant influence of conservative pressure campaigns on Facebook’s content moderation policies. Ultimately, the interview served as a calculated attempt to appease Republican lawmakers and shift blame away from Facebook’s own actions.
Read More
Meta’s decision to end US-based fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram has drawn sharp criticism, with Brazil’s communication minister calling it detrimental to democracy due to the potential for increased misinformation and hate speech. This move, driven by Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s concerns about political bias, replaces professional fact-checkers with a user-based system. Brazil’s public prosecutor’s office has demanded clarification from Meta regarding potential implementation of this change within the country. The Brazilian government, echoing concerns about the spread of disinformation, has previously taken strong action against social media platforms that fail to comply with regulations against online misinformation.
Read More
Meta is significantly altering its content moderation policies, ending its third-party fact-checking program in favor of a community-based system similar to X’s Community Notes. This shift, impacting Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, aims to reduce moderation errors and prioritize free expression, while still aggressively addressing high-severity violations like terrorism and child exploitation. The changes also include relaxing content policies on certain issues and increasing the threshold for content removal. These adjustments follow criticism of Meta’s moderation practices and reflect a broader industry trend towards less stringent content control.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and allows for confidential sharing of information. This ensures that important stories can be investigated and brought to light. Tips can be submitted via [link or method, if provided in the original article]. The Daily Beast welcomes contributions from all sources.
Read More
A political group supported by billionaire Elon Musk is using a Facebook account tagged “Progress 2028” to disseminate misleading advertisements suggesting that Kamala Harris endorses certain policies that she in fact does not. These include wanting to implement mandatory gun buybacks, bestowing Medicare benefits and driving licenses to illegal immigrants, and banning fracking. The ads are sponsored by Building America’s Future, a secret fundraisers funded by Musk and others, and tied to over $100 million Musk has spent backing the re-election bid of Donald Trump. As these advertisements are not technically in breach of Meta’s advertising policies and are protected by the American First Amendment, they cannot be removed, even though they have the potential to mislead voters. The advertisements have been viewed by millions in swing states so far.
Read More
Misinformation running rampant on Facebook has officials concerned about election disruptions. It’s a headline that seems all too familiar, yet the issue persists with no real solution in sight. The problem is not new, with Facebook being a cesspool of fake news, conspiracy theories, and propaganda for years now. Yet, despite the clear danger it poses to the democratic process, little has been done to truly combat the spread of misinformation on the platform.
The recent revelations about Russia’s use of social media to fuel instability in Western nations is just the tip of the iceberg. It is not just foreign actors that are using Facebook as a tool to manipulate public opinion, but also domestic groups and individuals who have realized the power of spreading lies and falsehoods to achieve their own agenda.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker