Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

Seventeen States Sue California Over Landmark Anti-Plastics Law

A new California law mandates packaging producers to reduce single-use plastics by 2032, requiring all packaging to be recyclable or compostable and penalizing producers for plastic pollution. Despite industry groups suing to block the law, citing undue financial burdens and the delegation of taxing authority to a third party, proponents argue it fairly distributes responsibility for waste management, incentivizes sustainable design, and reduces costs for communities. Environmental groups are also challenging the law, asserting its regulations permit toxic recycling methods and contain loopholes, thus undermining the intended environmental benefits and demanding real, not greenwashed, recycling practices.

Read More

UK Fast Fashion Waste Dumps in Ghana Wetlands: A Crisis of Consumption

An investigation revealed that discarded clothing from UK consumers, including items from major brands like Next, M&S, and Primark, has ended up in massive dumps within Ghana’s protected Densu wetland, a Ramsar site. These dumps, overflowing with fast fashion textiles, are harming local wildlife and polluting waterways, impacting the livelihoods of local fishermen. While some brands acknowledged the industry’s challenges and cited their take-back schemes, the sheer volume of exported textile waste overwhelms Ghana’s waste management capabilities. The situation highlights the urgent need for extended producer responsibility (EPR) frameworks to hold fashion companies accountable for their products’ end-of-life impact.

Read More