Donald Trump’s pursuit of presidential immunity from state-level civil lawsuits is a significant development, raising serious questions about the separation of powers and the rule of law. His claim centers on the assertion that defending against these numerous lawsuits would be an unacceptable distraction from his presidential duties, hindering the effective functioning of the executive branch.
This argument, however, immediately clashes with the established norms of a functioning democracy. Typically, a president’s business interests are placed in a blind trust, managed independently to avoid such conflicts of interest. The fact that this hasn’t happened under Trump’s administration underscores the unprecedented nature of the situation and highlights the blatant disregard for traditional ethical standards.… Continue reading
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election has sparked controversy. Republicans criticized the move as a political stunt, particularly given the refusal to release a related report on Trump’s handling of classified documents. Conversely, some Democrats lauded the partial release but criticized Garland for a delayed investigation. The differing reactions highlight the highly partisan nature of the situation, with Republicans pointing to the unreleased materials from the Biden investigation as a double standard. The release may also embolden future congressional efforts to challenge executive privilege claims.
Read More
Senate Democrats’ request for the FBI’s Matt Gaetz case files highlights a significant clash between transparency demands and established law enforcement practices. The Democrats’ action, stemming from Gaetz’s nomination as Attorney General, seeks to ensure a thorough vetting process. This includes examining the closed sex trafficking investigation into Gaetz, an investigation which, despite lacking sufficient evidence for charges, involved serious allegations.
The request underscores the public’s right to know about individuals holding powerful positions within the government. Taxpayers fund federal investigations, and the belief that such reports should be public, especially when concerning a potential Attorney General, is a powerful argument.… Continue reading
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-capitol-riot-committee-records-b1998102.html
It’s an absolute travesty they were able to delay this for as long as they did and it had to involve the Supreme Court to issue a ruling your average joe could have figured out.
SC never ruled on the merits per se, they just blocked a stay of the lower courts ruling, in effect not taking up the case. The lower court had essentially issued a scathing opinion that who is Trump to try and exert Executive privilege opposite to that of the current Executive branch. Roberts agreed at its ridiculousness. Trump never stood a chance and it only took a few months overall, which is lightning quick.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker