During a recent Fox News interview, President Trump hinted at invoking the Insurrection Act, claiming it would grant him “unquestioned power,” and suggesting it could suspend court cases, a claim disputed by legal experts. He previously deployed National Guard troops in other cities, facing judicial blocks in Chicago and Portland. Now, he is considering sending troops to San Francisco, potentially using the Insurrection Act to overcome any further legal obstacles. Critics point out that the Insurrection Act does not suspend the Constitution or court proceedings, and some view Trump’s statements as a power grab.
Read More
The recent deployment of federal troops in Washington, D.C., and Trump’s potential expansion to other cities, including Chicago, reflects a militarized approach to law enforcement. Despite no clear need for heavy military vehicles, as evidenced by a red-light-running incident involving an armored vehicle, the occupation has been met with significant opposition from residents who cite concerns about safety and a lack of focus on actual crime. Moreover, the administration’s actions, such as the arrest of an individual for public marijuana use, while also seemingly prioritizing aesthetic changes over effective solutions, and threats of further federal control, have raised questions about the motivations behind this approach. As such, officials in other cities, like Chicago, are already pushing back against these threats, viewing them as a power grab rather than a legitimate effort to improve safety.
Read More
The Miami City Commission voted to postpone the November 2025 election to 2026, a move that extends the terms of current officials, including term-limited Mayor Francis Suarez and Commissioner Joe Carollo. While proponents argue the change will increase voter turnout, critics, including candidates and some residents, label it a “power grab” and question the legality of altering the election date without voter approval. Despite concerns raised by the Florida Attorney General and opposing commissioners, the city’s legal counsel believes the change is permissible, citing a precedent set by North Miami. The postponement significantly impacts the political landscape, potentially affecting candidates and setting the stage for a vote on lifetime term limits for city officials in a special election.
Read More
Senate Democrats struggle to formulate a winning political message against the Republicans’ budget bill, despite its numerous flaws including massive tax cuts for the wealthy and devastating cuts to social programs. The bill’s unprecedented $200 billion allocation for immigration enforcement, far exceeding any other federal law enforcement area, is a largely untapped line of attack. This massive funding increase would dramatically escalate the administration’s already aggressive immigration crackdown. Democrats’ hesitancy to highlight this aspect may stem from a sense of political defeatism, overlooking the staggering scale of the proposed spending.
Read More
A potential executive branch power grab, via the impoundment of funds, risks a Supreme Court showdown and severely undermines the constitutional balance of powers. This action, potentially driven by figures like Russell Vought who advocate a sweeping governmental reshaping, is currently stalled by Senate budget deadlock. The short-term consequences are significant, but long-term implications threaten a further concentration of presidential power.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker