Rep. Thanedar is calling for President Trump’s impeachment due to the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a Supreme Court order preventing his removal. The Trump administration claims the deportation was an “administrative error,” but has since refused to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, defying a federal judge’s order. This defiance, according to Thanedar, constitutes an impeachable offense under Article Two of the U.S. Constitution. Further, the Salvadoran President has stated he will not return Abrego Garcia, despite the ongoing legal battle.
Read More
The US Supreme Court’s order temporarily halting the deportations of Venezuelan migrants represents a significant development, one that carries considerable weight and potential consequences. This ruling, unlike previous pronouncements on similar matters, is exceptionally clear and unambiguous in its directive. The court explicitly instructs the government to refrain from removing any Venezuelan migrants currently detained, pending further court orders. The order’s straightforward language leaves little room for the kind of technical maneuvering or interpretation that has characterized past responses from the administration.
The potential for a constitutional crisis is undeniable should the administration choose to ignore this order. Past instances of the administration’s disregard for Supreme Court decisions raise serious concerns about the court’s authority and the very principle of the separation of powers.… Continue reading
ICE agents approached a Spanish-speaking asylum seeker at Bluebonnet, presenting an English-only form and threatening deportation regardless of signature. The agents, aided by a Venezuelan translator, falsely claimed the form designated the asylum seeker as a member of the Tren de Aragua criminal organization. The client, lacking a removal order, refused to sign the document. The incident highlights concerns about due process and potential coercion in immigration enforcement.
Read More
A federal judge has issued a ruling blocking the administration from deporting non-citizens to third-party countries without affording them due process. This decision stems from a concerning practice where individuals are being sent to countries where they face potential torture or death, without any opportunity to contest their deportation.
The judge’s order directly addresses the administration’s actions, highlighting the lack of legal recourse provided to these individuals. It emphasizes the severity of sending individuals to countries where they are at risk of grave harm, and underscores the violation of fundamental due process rights. The judge’s powerful words—describing the situation as akin to extrajudicial rendition or state-sponsored kidnapping—paint a stark picture of the alleged human rights violations involved.… Continue reading
A federal appeals court, in an opinion penned by conservative Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, has ordered the government to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison after his illegal deportation. The court rejected the government’s claim that it has no responsibility to retrieve Abrego Garcia, highlighting the violation of due process and the potential for unchecked executive power. Judge Wilkinson’s strong rebuke emphasizes the gravity of the situation and warns of the erosion of the rule of law if the executive branch continues to disregard court orders. This decision, particularly from a judge known for upholding executive authority, serves as a significant warning to the Supreme Court and the nation.
Read More
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ denial of the Trump administration’s request for a stay in the Abrego-Garcia case is a significant development, underscoring the court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law. The court’s decision wasn’t merely a procedural ruling; it was a forceful rebuke of the executive branch’s actions. It serves as a stark warning against the erosion of fundamental legal principles and the potential for executive overreach.
The core issue revolves around the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a previous court order prohibiting such action without due process. This deportation was deemed a blatant disregard for legal mandates, a violation of established judicial authority.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling ordering the Trump administration to facilitate the return of Salvadoran national Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the US has been ignored by the president. This defiance stems from conflicting justifications, ranging from claims of judicial overreach in foreign policy matters to assertions of El Salvador’s sole responsibility. Trump’s actions represent a significant departure from established norms, potentially undermining the system of checks and balances intended to prevent executive overreach. The precedent set by ignoring a Supreme Court order raises concerns about the future of American governance.
Read More
Trump recently signed a healthcare executive order ostensibly aimed at reducing healthcare costs. However, a closer look reveals that this order, rather than benefiting the average American, appears to primarily serve the interests of pharmaceutical companies. One of the order’s key provisions seems to involve removing or delaying the ability of Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.
This action directly contradicts previous efforts to curb prescription drug costs, prompting criticism that this executive order effectively prevents Medicare from negotiating prices until medications have been on the market for a significantly longer period. This delay could allow pharmaceutical companies to maintain higher prices for extended periods, generating considerable profits.… Continue reading
California is suing the Trump administration, arguing the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China is illegal. The lawsuit claims these tariffs, justified by the administration as boosting manufacturing and stemming fentanyl flow, are unlawfully implemented without congressional approval. California contends the tariffs inflict billions of dollars in economic damage on the state, citing inflated costs and jeopardized jobs. The state seeks an immediate court order halting the tariffs, highlighting significant trade relationships with Canada and Mexico as particularly affected.
Read More
A judge has temporarily blocked an order from the former president targeting a law firm, describing the action as a “shocking abuse of power.” This isn’t the first time such accusations have been leveled, and the sheer volume of similar incidents throughout the former president’s tenure suggests this might not be an isolated incident, but rather a pattern of behavior. The extent of the alleged abuse raises concerns about the rule of law and the potential for executive overreach.
The move against the law firm appears to be part of a broader pattern of targeting individuals and organizations perceived as adversaries.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood