Executive branch overreach

Supreme Court Protects Fed, Enables Trump’s Power Grab

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could remove two federal agency board members, Gwynne Wilcox and Cathy Harris, while their lawsuits challenging their termination are pending. This decision, while allowing the removals, strongly implied that Federal Reserve board members possess unique protection against presidential dismissal. The Court’s majority reasoned that the executive power vested in the President allows removal of executive officers, subject to limited exceptions. However, a dissenting opinion argued this ruling undermines established precedent protecting the independence of administrative agencies, including the Federal Reserve, and creates an unnecessary exception. The Court’s stay order temporarily allows the removals but does not definitively resolve the broader constitutional questions involved.

Read More

Pentagon Chief Ignores Congress, Restores Fort Benning Name

The Pentagon chief’s recent decision to restore the name of Fort Benning has ignited a firestorm of controversy, highlighting a growing tension between the executive and legislative branches of government. This move, perceived by many as a blatant disregard for a Congressional provision, raises serious questions about the balance of power and the future of American democracy.

The core issue lies in the Pentagon chief’s apparent circumvention of a Congressional mandate. While the specifics of the Congressional provision aren’t explicitly detailed, the general understanding is that it aimed to prevent military bases from bearing the names of Confederate figures. By reinstating the name “Fort Benning,” the Pentagon chief seems to have found a loophole, possibly by renaming the base after a different individual with the same surname who wasn’t associated with the Confederacy.… Continue reading

Trump’s Unaccountability: A Failing American Democracy

Several of Trump’s controversial nominees, including Pete Hegseth for Defense Secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, possess extreme views and/or face credible accusations of misconduct. While some may be blocked due to scandals, their replacements would likely share similarly objectionable ideologies. This pattern extends to other nominees such as Linda McMahon and Brendan Carr, highlighting a concerning trend of prioritizing loyalty over qualifications. The unconfirmed appointment of Tom Homan as border czar further underscores this alarming disregard for established norms.

Read More