A federal court initially ruled against President Trump’s tariffs, citing an overreach of executive authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This ruling was temporarily stayed by a higher court pending appeal. Despite the legal challenges, market reactions were muted, with economists suggesting investors have already discounted the administration’s erratic trade policies. The administration plans to appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary, leaving the ultimate outcome uncertain and the future of the president’s trade agenda in question.
Read More
In response to a question regarding the legality of the president’s plan to deport incarcerated criminals, Bondi offered an unsupported assertion that the initiative would decrease crime and that these individuals would face maximum sentencing. However, this plan is likely illegal, violating federal law and potentially several constitutional amendments. The core issue lies in the illegality of deporting U.S. citizens, regardless of their criminal history. Such a plan would require significant legal reform, and is unlikely to be implemented.
Read More
A recent survey revealed that a significant 83 percent of respondents believe a president is obligated to abide by Supreme Court rulings. This finding underscores a widely held understanding of the fundamental principles underpinning the American system of government, a system built on checks and balances and the rule of law.
However, the remaining 17 percent who disagree present a concerning counterpoint. Their perspective challenges the very essence of judicial review and the separation of powers. It raises questions about their understanding of the constitutional framework, the role of the Supreme Court, and the limitations placed on executive authority.
This disparity in opinion highlights a significant divide within the populace regarding the fundamental tenets of American governance.… Continue reading
A temporary restraining order (TRO) by Judge Engelmayer prevents Elon Musk’s team from accessing Treasury Department data without proper security clearances, citing violations of the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Tax Reform Act of 1976. The government opposes the TRO, arguing it restricts executive branch power, while critics like Musk and JD Vance falsely claim judicial overreach. This controversy highlights the ongoing debate over executive authority versus judicial oversight and the potential for disregard of court orders. The core issue is whether the administration can circumvent established laws and regulations regarding data access, not whether the executive branch can obtain the data itself.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood