The article suggests that despite repeated warnings, European leaders have been slow to react to Russia’s aggression, even after events such as the Salisbury poisoning. It argues that the United States, under its current administration, is now actively working to undermine European democracies. The author presents a new US National Security Strategy as evidence, detailing its disturbing alignment with far-right ideologies and its strategic stability with Russia. Therefore, the article concludes by urging European leaders to recognize the end of the transatlantic alliance and to take decisive action to defend the continent’s future by ramping up military spending, confronting internal issues, and supporting Ukraine.
Read More
The recently released US national security strategy, which claims Europe faces “civilisational erasure” and aims to “correct its current trajectory,” has prompted strong condemnation from European leaders. António Costa, the president of the European Council, warned against US interference in European politics, stating that the US backing of nationalist parties is unacceptable. Analysts have identified the document as a major shift in transatlantic relations, with the US now officially committed to meddling in European electoral politics. The strategy has sparked debate, with some urging Europe to seize initiative and others cautioning against overreacting to an erratic administration.
Read More
The central premise revolves around the urgent need for Europe to forge its own peace plan for Ukraine, rather than passively waiting for the United States to take the lead. This sentiment arises from a growing recognition of American unreliability and a desire for greater European agency on the global stage. It’s been said time and again, and the call to action rings out: Europe needs to step up.
The core of the issue is multifaceted. Some commentators suggest that the US, even if acting with good intentions, may be leaning towards a peace deal that favors Russia, effectively a form of surrender by Ukraine.… Continue reading
European leaders recently warned Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy against making concessions to Russia without firm security guarantees from the United States. During a phone call, figures including French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz emphasized the necessity of US involvement in any future agreement’s security guarantees. This advice stemmed from concerns that Washington hasn’t clarified its response to potential Russian violations of a peace agreement. The warnings represent another instance of European leaders attempting to influence peace talks primarily led by the US with Russia and Ukraine.
Read More
Pope Leo XIV calls for a European role in Ukraine peace, marking a significant departure from his predecessor, a shift that is as noticeable as it is welcome. The contrast with the previous pontiff, who seemed to at least implicitly commend Russia’s “greatness,” is stark. The new Pope is signaling a clear move towards a more assertive stance, implicitly acknowledging the need for active European involvement in resolving the ongoing conflict. This indicates a potential paradigm shift in Vatican foreign policy, and more broadly, in how the world’s most powerful religious institution views the war.
This isn’t just about a change in rhetoric; it’s about a potential change in action.… Continue reading
Europe Wants to Get the Word Out: Russia Is to Blame for Sabotage
It’s been a long time coming, but it seems like Europe is finally ready to publicly acknowledge something that many have suspected for years: Russia is actively sabotaging European infrastructure. It’s a bit like seeing a slow-motion car crash finally reach its inevitable conclusion. We’ve seen the warning signs, the near misses, the subtle nudges, and now, finally, the realization that this isn’t just a series of unfortunate events but a deliberate campaign.
This revelation, though belated, could be a turning point. Recognizing the pattern of sabotage as a coordinated hybrid war is a crucial first step.… Continue reading
International outcry persists over Russia’s actions in Ukraine, including the abduction of Ukrainian children and attacks on civilians, leading to investigations into over 178,000 alleged Russian crimes. A UN commission has found that Russian authorities committed crimes against humanity. European Union officials emphasize the necessity of holding Russia accountable, warning that allowing impunity would invite further aggression and invasion. The EU is also working towards establishing a special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders for their actions.
Read More
A recent study by Corisk and the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs has revealed that a Russian military victory in Ukraine would be significantly more costly for Europe compared to a Ukrainian victory. The researchers outlined two scenarios: a Russian partial victory, which could lead to long-term political instability and a surge of refugees, resulting in costs ranging from €1.2 to €1.6 trillion due to defense spending and refugee-related expenses. Conversely, a Ukrainian victory, facilitated by substantial military aid, would cost Europe approximately €522–838 billion. The study highlights the urgency for Europe to support Ukraine as the United States’ support may wane, and the European Commission is exploring a reparations loan scheme to finance Ukraine’s needs.
Read More
European Commission chief spokeswoman Paula Pinho affirmed Volodymyr Zelenskyy as Ukraine’s democratically elected president, contrasting this with apparent difficulties in recognition by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Pinho highlighted the EU’s collaboration with Zelenskyy and its support for his efforts to end the war and achieve peace. This stance follows Putin’s repeated assertions questioning Zelenskyy’s legitimacy, a position viewed as posturing by some. While the Kremlin has reportedly received details of a peace plan, and a meeting between the Ukrainian and US negotiating teams is anticipated, potential negotiations involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy are also being explored.
Read More
Moldovan Parliament votes to close Russian cultural centre, a significant move that’s definitely making waves in the political landscape. It’s not just a symbolic gesture; it’s a concrete step in a much larger game of influence and security, reflecting Moldova’s determination to distance itself from Russia. This decision seems to be driven by a clear desire to reduce Moscow’s sway and reaffirm Moldova’s path toward the European Union.
This vote underscores the current pro-European stance of the Moldovan government, led by President Maia Sandu, whose party holds a majority in the parliament. They’re really pushing for EU membership by the end of this decade, and this closure is just one more indication of their commitment.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood