The Senate has approved a $901 billion military policy bill, authorizing defense programs and a 3.8% troop pay increase. The legislation represents a compromise between parties, reflecting some of President Trump’s proposals while also addressing congressional concerns. Key provisions include enhanced oversight of the Department of Defense, repeal of outdated war authorizations, and a push to require Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide video of strikes on alleged drug boats near Venezuela. Further, the bill codifies cuts to diversity and climate initiatives while providing military aid to Ukraine and lifting U.S. sanctions on Syria.
Read More
The House of Representatives recently passed a $900 billion defense spending bill including military aid to Ukraine, specifically reauthorizing the USAI and allocating $400 million annually for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The legislation also restricts the Pentagon’s ability to reduce troops in Europe below 76,000 for more than 45 days and mandates congressional notification regarding restrictions on intelligence sharing with Ukraine. Despite the bill’s support, the Trump administration is currently using the PURL to sell arms to Ukraine via NATO partners instead of allocating new defense aid. In his push for a peace deal, Trump has emphasized that the U.S. is not directly funding the war but rather profiting from weapons sales to NATO.
Read More
The outgoing Dutch government has approved an extra €700 million in aid for Ukraine for next year. This funding comes from unspent funds within other ministries, including the Defence Equipment Budget Fund and the Foreign Ministry. While the Netherlands already provides substantial annual aid, including €3.5 billion, the new allocation addresses a proposal to bolster the 2026 budget after €2 billion from next year’s budget was spent this year. Despite initial reluctance from Prime Minister Dick Schoof, the cabinet yielded to parliamentary pressure and also warned of challenges finding additional funds in the budget next year, underscoring the complexities of continued support.
Read More
The United States has unexpectedly suspended the supply of some weapons to Ukraine and severed a direct communication channel with German generals, according to Bundeswehr Lieutenant General Christian Freuding. This interruption in aid occurred without prior warning to German partners. Freuding, who previously coordinated military support for Ukraine, now relies on the German Embassy in Washington to gather information from the Pentagon, highlighting the challenges created by this shift.
Read More
The use of Russia’s frozen assets to aid Ukraine has become a contentious issue for Ukraine’s allies, with Belgium particularly hesitant due to concerns about financial liability and Russian retaliation. The EU proposed using the assets to facilitate a loan for Ukraine, but Belgium’s hesitations have stalled progress. A new proposal by a former U.S. administration, seeking to profit from the assets held in Europe, could further complicate the situation and pressure the EU to unfreeze the assets, potentially leaving European taxpayers to cover the loan repayment to Russia. The proposal includes a U.S. investment in Ukraine’s reconstruction with the U.S. receiving 50% of the profits.
Read More
Despite widespread public displays of support for Ukraine by EU leaders, financial and military contributions vary significantly across member states. Data reveals a stark contrast, with countries like Denmark contributing a substantial portion of their GDP compared to nations such as Spain. Nordic and Baltic countries generally offer the most aid relative to their economic output, while some nations contribute considerably less. This disparity prompted criticism, urging leaders to match their rhetoric with financial commitments to ensure continued support for Ukraine, especially given the impending budget shortfall.
Read More
Ursula von der Leyen has urged EU countries to agree by December on a plan to provide Ukraine with €135.7 billion in military and financial aid over the next two years. The European Commission President outlined three potential options, including voluntary member state contributions, joint debt at the EU level, and a reparations loan based on Russia’s frozen assets. While the first two options would increase the fiscal burden, the reparations loan faces legal complexities and concerns about perceptions of confiscation, especially regarding a large sum held in Belgium. Von der Leyen stresses the urgency of a decision, as the EU leaders will meet in December, and suggests that the options can be combined or used sequentially to avoid aid disruption.
Read More
NATO confirms $60 billion Ukraine aid package for 2026, a truly significant commitment. This sum, we’re talking about a whopping $60 billion, is a clear statement of continued support. It’s a substantial amount that immediately grabs your attention. It’s more than the entire defense budgets of many nations around the world. We’re talking about a level of investment that’s a real game-changer. It’s a clear signal that NATO intends to remain engaged, and at a considerable financial level. This kind of commitment certainly isn’t a small deal, and it’s something that has the potential to reshape the dynamics of the conflict.… Continue reading
Finland’s president hails the plan as “ingenious” to seize frozen Russian assets for Ukraine, and it’s interesting to unpack why this specific approach is being lauded. It seems the idea centers around a clever financial mechanism, not a straightforward seizure of assets, and that makes all the difference. The core concept is that the European Union would essentially provide Ukraine with an interest-free loan. That loan, however, would be “backed” by the frozen Russian assets – primarily held within the Euroclear financial repository in Belgium. This means if Russia refuses to pay war reparations (which they almost certainly will), those assets can be used to cover the loan.… Continue reading
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell criticized Donald Trump’s responses regarding the pause in U.S. military aid to Ukraine, labeling them as evidence of Trump’s “stupidity.” O’Donnell highlighted Trump’s “I haven’t thought about it” response as a prime example of this, particularly since the decision was made by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. O’Donnell argued that Trump’s inability to provide a clear answer, along with contradictory statements like “I would know if a decision was made,” demonstrated a lack of understanding about a critical policy decision. The host emphasized that Trump’s remarks made no sense, highlighting the president’s apparent detachment from important matters.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood