In Moberly, Missouri, Democrat Jill Imbler is leading a signature-gathering effort to repeal a new congressional map passed by Republicans. This map, redrawn at the request of Donald Trump, aims to create more Republican seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. Using a provision in the Missouri constitution, Imbler and other canvassers have until December 11th to collect over 106,000 signatures to put the new map to a voter referendum. Despite the heavily Republican leaning county, Imbler is door knocking and gaining signatures with the backing of groups that believe in voting rights for the people. This Missouri effort is being closely watched as a pivotal battleground in the ongoing redistricting war between Democrats and Republicans.
Read More
The subject in question is attempting to restrict voting access by advocating for one-day in-person voting, a move considered outdated given modern technology. This approach contrasts with Democratic efforts to expand voting through measures like mail-in voting and early voting. The speaker believes this strategy is an attempt to gain an advantage by potentially altering voting laws to favor a specific outcome. Furthermore, a quote from the subject indicates a belief that these restrictions are necessary to prevent Democrats from gaining power.
Read More
Utah judge rejects GOP-favored map, handing Dems another redistricting win – but let’s be clear, it’s about far more than just “handing Dems a win.” It’s actually a win for the very principle of fair and free elections, and ultimately, a victory for the citizens of Utah in ensuring they get proper representation in Congress. It’s a good starting point, and it’s heartening to see this kind of pushback from the judiciary.
The specific case, as we understand it, stems from a ruling by Third District Judge Dianna Gibson. She found that the map in question, with a deadline looming, didn’t comply with Utah law.… Continue reading
California Republicans have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a newly approved U.S. House map, alleging it illegally uses race to favor Hispanic voters and violates constitutional rights. The new map, which voters passed as Proposition 50, is expected to create more Democratic seats and could aid the party in upcoming midterm elections, potentially offsetting Republican gains in other states. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, argues the map violates equal protection and voting rights. The outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, with a decision on a temporary restraining order pending before the December 19 deadline for candidate signature collection.
Read More
In a recent ruling, a federal judge has permanently blocked a portion of former President Donald Trump’s executive order regarding voter identification requirements. The order, which aimed to overhaul federal elections, was challenged by various groups and deemed unlawful because it would have required voters to present passports or similar documents to prove citizenship. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly determined that the U.S. Constitution grants states, not the president, the authority to oversee elections, making this part of the order illegal. The ruling comes amidst ongoing scrutiny of the electoral system and false claims of widespread fraud.
Read More
A federal judge has ruled against President Trump’s request to add a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly determined the directive was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, siding with Democratic and civil rights groups. The ruling prevents the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from adding the requirement, which has been attempted by Republicans but faced legal challenges. The lawsuit will continue to address other aspects of Trump’s executive order, including the requirement that all mailed ballots be received by Election Day.
Read More
California will dispatch observers to watch DOJ’s election monitors, and it’s a development that immediately sparks a wave of thoughts and reactions, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of headline that makes you stop and consider the layers involved in ensuring a fair and transparent election process. The phrase “who watches the watchmen” pops into mind, a sentiment that seems to be the very core of this move. We’ve reached a point where scrutiny is paramount, and this action by California is a clear indication of that.
This whole situation brings to the forefront the current political climate, and the underlying distrust that exists.… Continue reading
During a Senate confirmation hearing, President Trump’s nominee for Ambassador to South Africa, Brent Bozell, repeatedly refused to state his personal views on whether he supported or opposed policies that would prevent Black Americans from voting. Senator Chris Murphy pressed Bozell on his stance regarding discriminatory refugee policies as well as re-implementing racially biased voting laws. Bozell insisted his personal views were irrelevant, intending to focus on his role as ambassador and following the President’s directives. Murphy criticized Bozell’s lack of transparency, emphasizing that his views were crucial for assessing his qualifications for the position.
Read More
The United States is currently embroiled in a battle over partisan gerrymandering, with Republican-controlled legislatures redrawing districts to favor their party. This practice has led to calls for action, including a proposed ballot measure in California that would temporarily suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission. Despite overwhelming public disapproval of partisan gerrymandering, the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, has ruled against federal intervention in these cases, effectively allowing such practices to continue. This decision has exacerbated the issue, giving Republicans an advantage in the House and potentially hindering the democratic process. In response, California voters now have the opportunity to counteract these effects, which could shift the balance of power.
Read More
Missouri Voters Sue to Block ‘Unconstitutional’ GOP Gerrymander: The crux of the matter is that Missouri voters are taking legal action, aiming to halt what they believe is an unconstitutional gerrymander orchestrated by the state’s Republican party. This lawsuit reflects growing frustration with the way electoral districts are being drawn, potentially skewing representation and undermining the will of the voters. It is a direct challenge to the political maneuvering that often leaves citizens feeling their voices are unheard and their votes diluted.
Missouri Voters Sue to Block ‘Unconstitutional’ GOP Gerrymander: The backdrop to this lawsuit involves a broader pattern of actions by Missouri Republicans that suggest a disconnect from the preferences of the state’s electorate.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood