According to the Wall Street Journal, Donald Trump informed several European leaders that Vladimir Putin believes he is winning the war in Ukraine and has no intention of ending hostilities. Despite this acknowledgment, Trump opposes further sanctions on Russia, favoring lower-level talks mediated by the Vatican. He expressed reservations about an “unconditional” ceasefire, a term he previously used, and showed wavering commitment to direct US involvement in the proposed negotiations. This private admission contrasts with Trump’s prior public statements claiming Putin desires peace.
Read More
The EU and Britain imposed new sanctions on Russia’s “shadow fleet” of oil tankers, marking the 17th such action since the Ukraine invasion. This coordinated response followed recent Russian drone attacks on Ukraine and came despite a lack of accompanying U.S. sanctions. While President Zelenskyy urged continued U.S. involvement in peace negotiations, the White House opted against additional sanctions, prioritizing dialogue with Russia. The sanctions target Russia’s oil export capabilities, aiming to increase pressure for a ceasefire.
Read More
Following the EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys urged immediate commencement of work on the 18th EU sanctions package against Russia. This package should target Russia’s most vulnerable sectors, including energy, finance, and the defense industry, to counteract Putin’s delaying tactics. Budrys stressed the need for swift action, emphasizing that the previous sanctions package is already outdated and decisive measures are necessary to maintain credibility. The 18th package may include targeting banks from non-EU countries supporting Russia’s military. This follows discussions between Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and European Commission President von der Leyen regarding further restrictions on Moscow.
Read More
The EU and Britain are forging ahead with new sanctions against Russia, a move that conspicuously sidesteps the anticipated involvement—or rather, the lack thereof—from the United States under its current leadership. This decisive action demonstrates a clear divergence in approach regarding Russia’s aggression, with Europe taking the lead in imposing consequences while the US remains seemingly hesitant.
This proactive stance by the EU and Britain underscores a shift in the geopolitical landscape. The comments about the US no longer holding its traditional position as the global leader are striking. The suggestion that the current US administration requires permission from Putin before taking action highlights a perceived lack of independence in foreign policy.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood