Ethics Violations

Democrats Accuse Justice Thomas of Undisclosed Trips

Justice Thomas Did Not Disclose Additional Trips, Democrats Say

Justice Thomas’s failure to disclose additional trips has sparked outrage among Democrats. The lack of transparency surrounding these undisclosed trips raises serious questions about his adherence to ethical standards expected of a Supreme Court Justice. This situation highlights a broader concern regarding accountability for high-ranking officials.

The sheer volume of undisclosed travel raises questions about the extent of his unreported activities. It suggests a pattern of behavior that goes beyond simple oversight and raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. This lack of transparency erodes public trust in the integrity of the Supreme Court.… Continue reading

Warren Warns of Trump Transition Threat: Unfunded, Unaccountable, and Potentially Dangerous

Senator Elizabeth Warren’s letter to the GSA administrator highlights the Trump transition team’s unprecedented refusal to sign standard memoranda of understanding with the Biden-Harris administration, hindering the incoming administration’s ability to govern effectively. This refusal also prevents the publication of a comprehensive ethics code addressing Trump’s conflicts of interest, increasing the risk of special interest influence. Furthermore, the lack of an agreement allows the Trump team to avoid disclosing transition donors, potentially circumventing individual donation limits and raising ethical concerns about transparency and potential quid pro quo arrangements. Warren’s letter demands answers from the GSA regarding the team’s non-compliance.

Read More

Trump’s Secret Transition Funding: Refusal to Disclose Donors Sparks Outrage

Donald Trump’s 2025 transition team is defying ethics laws and norms by accepting undisclosed donations, bypassing mandated ethics pledges and plans, and refusing FBI background checks on nominees. This disregard for established procedures has prompted criticism, with concerns raised about foreign influence and conflicts of interest. The team’s actions undermine the purpose of presidential transition laws and raise serious questions regarding transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the lack of thorough vetting of nominees, including those facing serious allegations of misconduct, exacerbates these concerns.

Read More