Apple shareholders rejected a proposal by the National Center for Public Policy Research to end the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The proposal, mirroring similar unsuccessful attempts at other companies, argued that DEI programs are harmful to business and expose companies to legal risks. Apple’s management defended its commitment to diversity, citing its positive impact on the company’s culture and success. Despite this vote, Apple acknowledged the evolving legal landscape and suggested potential future adjustments to its DEI program. The rejection follows a recent lawsuit against Target over similar DEI initiatives.
Read More
Target’s cofounder’s daughters, Anne and Lucy Dayton, publicly criticized the company’s recent rollback of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, arguing that this decision contradicts the company’s founding principles of customer focus and community well-being. They expressed concern over businesses succumbing to political pressure, asserting that ethical business models are not inherently illegal. This action follows Target’s decision to end programs supporting Black employees and businesses, a move mirroring similar cutbacks by other major corporations. Target declined to respond to the criticism.
Read More
Target, a retail giant known for its wide array of products and once considered a progressive force in the business world, is now facing a proposed class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit, spearheaded by the City of Riviera Beach Police Pension Fund in Florida, alleges that Target defrauded shareholders by inflating stock prices while simultaneously using investor funds to pursue what the plaintiffs describe as “political and social goals.” This accusation essentially claims that Target’s embrace of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives negatively impacted its financial performance, ultimately harming investors.
This lawsuit is generating considerable debate. Many see it as an attack on DEI initiatives, highlighting a growing tension between corporate social responsibility and maximizing shareholder value.… Continue reading
Dutch pension funds ABP and Bpf Bouw divested from Tesla, citing Elon Musk’s $56 billion bonus as inconsistent with their governance principles. ABP, which sold approximately $650 million in Tesla shares, explained the decision in a blog post addressing public controversy and social media backlash, including comments from Musk himself. The sale, however, is also part of ABP’s broader strategy to reduce its equity portfolio from 2,000 to 1,100 companies. While other large Dutch pension funds voted against Musk’s compensation, they have not yet followed suit, though some are reevaluating their holdings.
Read More
A second Trump administration is poised to significantly alter healthcare, potentially repealing or severely weakening the Affordable Care Act through budget cuts and state-level block grants. Simultaneously, access to transgender care could be drastically reduced via executive orders defunding providers. While insulin cost caps are likely to remain, the administration is expected to reverse the Biden-era ESG investment rule and potentially shift the Department of Labor’s stance on cryptocurrencies in 401(k) plans. These changes signal a broad reshaping of policy across multiple sectors.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood