In a recent interview, President Trump expressed uncertainty regarding the extent to which due process rights apply to both citizens and non-citizens, stating he was unsure and not a lawyer. He downplayed the likelihood of military intervention to annex Canada, despite previous pronouncements, but remained less certain about Greenland. While pushing back against recession predictions and attributing economic downturn to his predecessor, he also played down the possibility of a third presidential term despite previous suggestions to the contrary. He highlighted his administration’s accomplishments and the continued strength of his political movement.
Read More
The courts must stop presuming Donald Trump is a regular president. This presumption of normalcy, this tacit acceptance of his actions as within the bounds of acceptable presidential behavior, is a dangerous and unsustainable approach. It allows a man who openly flouts court orders and democratic norms to operate with impunity, eroding the very foundations of the justice system.
The lack of consequences for violating court orders is particularly alarming. The point of a legal system is to enforce its rulings, and when those rulings are ignored without repercussions, the system itself becomes meaningless. This inaction sends a clear message: that power, not law, dictates the outcome.… Continue reading
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell permanently blocked President Trump’s executive order targeting Perkins Coie, deeming it an unconstitutional attack on the American legal system’s foundational principles. The order, unprecedented in its targeting of a law firm for representing clients with opposing viewpoints, imposed punitive measures including suspension of security clearances and contract terminations. Judge Howell’s ruling highlights the order as an assault on the independence of the legal profession and the right to counsel. This decision follows temporary injunctions for other firms similarly targeted, with some reportedly reaching settlements with the president.
Read More
A federal judge has blocked President Trump’s executive order targeting Perkins Coie, deeming it an unconstitutional infringement on clients’ right to counsel and the firm’s due process rights. The order, unprecedented in its attempt to punish a law firm for representing clients with opposing views, directed agencies to take actions including contract reviews, building access restrictions, and security clearance revocations. Judge Howell’s decision follows similar temporary restraining orders for other firms, and stands in contrast to deals struck by nine other law firms to avoid similar executive actions. The judge characterized the order as an attack on fundamental judicial principles, highlighting the firm’s penalization for representing clients and expressing views at odds with the President.
Read More
Judges nationwide are experiencing a surge in threats, both physical and professional, stemming from their judicial duties. These attacks, seemingly intended to intimidate, are not random occurrences. Justice Jackson highlighted the “elephant in the room”—the former president’s actions—as a contributing factor to this concerning trend. She emphasized that these are not isolated incidents but rather affect the entire judicial system’s ability to function effectively.
Read More
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivered a strong condemnation of the Trump administration’s attacks on federal judges, characterizing them as threats to the rule of law and democratic norms. These attacks, ranging from threats of violence and professional retaliation to intimidation tactics like publicizing judges’ home addresses, are not isolated incidents but rather a systemic effort to undermine judicial independence. Jackson drew parallels to past challenges faced by judges during pivotal moments in American history, emphasizing the importance of resisting such pressures. Her speech, met with a standing ovation, served as the most forceful rebuke from the Supreme Court regarding these escalating attacks.
Read More
A judge has denied the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to further delay the discovery process in the Abrego Garcia case. This decision comes after the DOJ was granted a week-long stay just days prior, meaning they now have only five days to comply with the court’s order. While this might seem like a small victory, the judge’s firmness in setting a deadline suggests a possible end to the seemingly endless postponements.
The DOJ’s request for a delay is unsurprising, given the administration’s history of employing delay tactics. The implication is that they require more time to gather and potentially manipulate evidence, a claim fueled by the dubious nature of the initial allegations against Abrego Garcia.… Continue reading
President Trump’s administration is characterized by widespread disregard for the rule of law, demonstrated through the appointment of unqualified loyalists, the elimination of government accountability, and the weaponization of his power against political opponents. His actions include bypassing the cabinet to fire federal employees, pardoning January 6th rioters, and targeting those who oppose him, including judges and institutions. Furthermore, Trump has shown blatant disregard for international relations, engaging in aggressive and harmful actions toward allies and trading partners. His pursuit of a third term, despite constitutional limitations, underscores his belief in being above the law and his insatiable desire for power.
Read More
The sheer volume is staggering: 220 lawsuits in a mere 100 days. This unprecedented legal blitz targeting the Trump administration highlights a pattern of alleged lawbreaking on a scale rarely seen before. The sheer frequency with which these lawsuits are arising suggests a systemic issue, not merely a series of isolated incidents. This isn’t just about individual missteps; it points to a possible disregard for legal processes and established norms.
The scale of the legal challenges is remarkable, and the fact that they’re occurring with such frequency speaks volumes. It’s not just the number of lawsuits, but the context in which they’re filed that’s noteworthy.… Continue reading
The poll reveals overwhelmingly negative public perception of Trump’s performance, with only 39% approving of his overall job, a significant decrease. Disapproval is even higher regarding specific policies, including widespread concern about economic recession and inflation driven by his tariffs. Majorities believe he disregards court orders and abuses executive power. This stark disapproval contrasts sharply with the president’s self-assessment of success.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood