Judge April Perry released a full opinion justifying her decision to block President Trump from deploying Texas National Guard troops in Chicago, citing concerns about the administration’s grasp on reality. Perry’s ruling stated the administration’s justification for deployment did not meet the necessary criteria, finding no evidence of rebellion or significant disorder. She criticized the administration’s conflation of protests with riots and a lack of objectivity. Perry concluded the administration’s perceptions were unreliable, supporting the decision to block the deployment.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut expressed concern over the Trump administration’s attempt to circumvent her order blocking Oregon National Guard troops from Portland by deploying troops from other states like California and Texas. At a late-night hearing, Immergut questioned the legality of this action, specifically asking if bringing in federalized National Guard troops from California contradicted her previous ruling. After hearing arguments, the judge expanded her order to prevent troops from any state from being sent to Portland, citing the relatively small size of the protests and potential violations of Oregon’s self-governance.
Read More
The article highlights the Trump administration’s aggressive actions against non-citizen residents, specifically targeting them based on their speech and viewpoints. Judge William Young, in *American Association of University Professors v Rubio*, ruled the administration violated the First Amendment by detaining and deporting pro-Palestinian foreign scholars, emphasizing that the Constitution does not differentiate between citizens and immigrants regarding freedom of speech. Young’s decision condemned Trump’s actions as unconstitutional and a threat to fundamental rights, citing instances of immigrants like Mahmoud Khalil and Rümeysa Öztürk being targeted for their speech. The judge’s opinion extends beyond the immediate case, framing Trump’s actions as a broader threat to American values and urging Americans to defend constitutional principles.
Read More
Ketanji Brown Jackson, the Supreme Court’s newest justice, is quickly establishing herself as a powerful liberal voice, especially in her dissents. In a footnote of her dissent in Trump v. Casa, Jackson cited Ernst Fraenkel’s work on Nazi Germany’s dual legal system, drawing a parallel between the current legal landscape and unchecked executive power. This subtle yet striking comparison serves as a warning about the potential threats to the rule of law. Jackson’s dissents, notably in the face of conservative court decisions, are a consistent call for justice.
Read More
Trump says he is authorizing military to use ‘Full Force’ in Portland, a statement that immediately raises alarm bells. The sheer absurdity of the claim that Portland is “war ravaged” is frankly baffling. The image conjured – of a city under siege, requiring a military intervention – is completely divorced from reality. Reports from individuals living in Portland paint a picture of a place far from a war zone, with fall colors and generally peaceful conditions. It’s difficult to understand what threat the military would even be responding to.
The very idea of deploying the military with “full force” against citizens, without any apparent justification, is deeply concerning.… Continue reading
Following a warning to immigration agents about indiscriminate detentions, Acting US Attorney Michele Beckwith was terminated by President Trump. The termination came shortly after Beckwith informed Border Patrol that agents must comply with court orders prohibiting detention without reasonable suspicion, and the Supreme Court had recently overturned a similar order. The same day as the termination, Border Patrol proceeded with a raid in Sacramento. This firing is part of a pattern of dismissals of federal prosecutors who did not align with the President’s agenda, and Beckwith has appealed her termination.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith expressed deep concern regarding the current state of the rule of law, stating it is “under attack” like never before. Smith highlighted instances of the Justice Department’s diminished credibility, citing the dismissal of career public servants and the perceived erosion of nonpartisan enforcement. He noted that political opponents and perceived enemies are targeted for investigation, while those close to the president face no such scrutiny. Smith’s remarks emphasized the critical importance of equal application and enforcement of the law for all citizens.
Read More
Justice Dept officials’ statements on Luigi Mangione broke court rules, judge says. It’s a phrase that immediately raises eyebrows, doesn’t it? It speaks to a potential breakdown in the very foundations of our legal system, where fairness and due process are supposed to reign supreme. And the fact that Justice Department officials, the very people tasked with upholding the law, are accused of this, adds another layer of complexity. You can’t help but wonder, what exactly did they say, and why did it warrant such a stern rebuke from the bench?
The crux of the issue, it seems, revolves around the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s presidency is characterized by a relentless pursuit of punishing political enemies and rewarding allies, utilizing the law as a weapon. This is seen in his public call for the persecution of prominent opponents like James Comey, Adam Schiff, and Letitia James, communicated via a post on Saturday. Simultaneously, it was revealed that Trump’s “border czar,” Tom Homan, was caught in an FBI sting operation for accepting a bribe, suggesting a willingness to corrupt government processes for personal gain. These actions highlight Trump’s use of power to undermine the integrity of law and order.
Read More
Following the conviction of former President Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup, massive protests erupted across Brazil and abroad, with tens of thousands demanding that he not be granted amnesty. These demonstrations, spearheaded by renowned musicians and actors, were a response to Bolsonaro’s failed attempt to cling to power after losing the 2022 election and right-wing efforts to mitigate his sentence, including draft legislation that could protect lawmakers from accountability. Protesters, who gathered in cities like Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Brasília, expressed anger over the possibility of impunity for Bolsonaro’s actions, as well as the potential impact of the “Bandit’s Bill” on the country’s democracy. These pro-democracy rallies were significant, with demonstrators voicing their opposition to any actions that might undermine the rule of law.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood