Kelly to Hegseth: Pentagon investigation over ‘illegal orders’ video won’t ‘intimidate me’ is a situation that’s really got people talking, and for good reason. It all started with a video from Senator Mark Kelly, where he essentially reminded service members of their duty to uphold the law and not follow illegal orders. That’s a pretty straightforward message, right? But the reaction from some corners, particularly the Trump administration, has been anything but.
The response from the administration, with calls for Kelly’s arrest and even suggestions of execution, is what’s truly alarming. It’s like they’re trying to punish someone for simply stating the obvious – that soldiers aren’t supposed to obey orders that break the law.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court made a horrible mistake when it gave Trump absolute power. It’s hard to even call it a mistake, really. More like a deliberate dismantling of the checks and balances that have, until recently, defined American democracy. This wasn’t an accident; it was a carefully orchestrated maneuver, a long game played by a conservative movement that has, for decades, prioritized reshaping the judiciary. And the consequences are terrifyingly clear.
What’s really chilling is the Supreme Court’s rationale, as articulated by Chief Justice Roberts. He argued that a president must be able to “carry out his constitutional duties without undue caution” and take “bold and unhesitating action.”… Continue reading
Dozens of former US Department of Justice attorneys have detailed the politicization of federal law enforcement during Donald Trump’s second term. The attorneys reported directives to investigate Trump’s political opponents, drop investigations, and mass pardons, including those who participated in the January 6th Capitol riot. This politicization extended to executive orders targeting law firms and investigations with predetermined outcomes, and the use of pardons for political allies. Additionally, there have been efforts to relax gift-acceptance rules, and misuse of government resources for personal gain.
Read More
Trump re-pardons a Jan. 6 defendant to erase unrelated gun conviction, and it’s certainly a development that raises a lot of eyebrows. It’s hard not to notice the layers of complexity and potential implications that come with this action. We’re talking about a situation where a pardon was essentially doubled down on. The original pardon related to the defendant’s involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot. This is what you would expect. However, this re-pardon is aimed at wiping away a completely separate conviction – a firearms charge that stemmed from a different set of circumstances. It’s a bit like giving someone a “get out of jail free” card twice, even when the initial card should have been sufficient.… Continue reading
Judge Mark L. Wolf, a Reagan-appointed jurist, resigned from the federal judiciary due to concerns about Donald Trump’s use of the law for partisan purposes and the president’s assault on the rule of law. Wolf, who previously served in the Justice Department, felt compelled to speak out against the White House’s actions, which he views as an existential threat to democracy. He directly compared Trump’s actions to those of Nixon, emphasizing the severity of the current situation. Wolf hopes to act as a spokesperson for other judges who are unable to speak candidly about the current administration.
Read More
In a recent development, Judge Mark Wolf, a Reagan appointee, resigned to publicly criticize the Trump administration’s actions, citing an “assault on the rule of law.” Wolf accused Trump of using the law for partisan purposes, targeting political adversaries while protecting allies. This resignation follows rising tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration, with other Reagan-appointed judges also voicing similar concerns. Wolf’s primary concerns include Trump’s dismantling of agencies investigating corruption and the increase in threats against judges.
Read More
**Judge permanently blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland, saying Trump exceeded his authority**
The news that a judge permanently blocked the deployment of the National Guard to Portland is a welcome development, a clear indication that a branch of government is actively scrutinizing and attempting to curtail the overreach of presidential power. This ruling, specifically citing that Trump exceeded his authority, is important and serves as a critical check and balance. The judge’s decision, based on the fact that Trump’s deployment was “untethered from the facts” and reality, should ideally be straightforward, and the fact that it is even a victory to be celebrated points to the erosion of basic legal principles in these times.… Continue reading
Senator Sanders believes the current political climate represents a pivotal moment in American history, as the President is allegedly undermining the Constitution and the rule of law. He asserts that the government shutdown is not the Democrats’ responsibility to resolve, but rather the Republicans, as they are refusing to negotiate. Sanders acknowledges the pressure both Democrats and Republicans face from constituents, particularly regarding the potential impact of budget decisions on healthcare costs.
Read More
Trump Administration: The recent court ruling, mandating the Trump administration to reinstate SNAP benefits by Wednesday, has sparked a cascade of reactions. It’s hard to ignore the implications. The judge is clear: the benefits must be paid. The question that hangs in the air is, will they comply?
Trump’s response has been, as expected, a mix of defiance and blame. It’s the Democrats’ fault, he seems to imply. This is where it gets interesting, with the potential for further legal battles and political maneuvering. The administration has a track record of ignoring court orders, and the Supreme Court’s potential intervention also looms large.… Continue reading
Senator Rand Paul has criticized the Trump administration’s military actions against alleged drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean Sea, calling them “extrajudicial killings.” According to Paul, no evidence has been presented to Congress to justify these military operations, and he asserts that Congress must authorize any war. Paul highlighted that the government has not presented any information regarding the identities, evidence, or if the people aboard the vessels were armed. He compared the lack of due process to practices of nations like China and Iran, where drug dealers are summarily executed without evidence.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker