Judge in Minnesota Says ICE Has Violated Nearly 100 Court Orders
It’s pretty clear: a judge in Minnesota has called out ICE for a serious problem, and the numbers are alarming. We’re talking about nearly 100 court orders that ICE has simply disregarded. Think about that for a moment. These aren’t suggestions or friendly requests; these are court orders, the backbone of our legal system, and ICE is, according to this judge, failing to comply. The judge was clear too – “ICE is not a law unto itself.” It seems ICE is operating with a disregard for the legal process.
The judge’s tally, and it’s important to note this, was “hurriedly compiled.”… Continue reading
City prosecutors are stepping up, uniting to bring charges against federal agents, a move that signals a shift in the legal landscape. The core of this action lies in investigating reports of crimes allegedly committed by these agents, highlighting a breakdown of trust and cooperation, particularly with the federal government. This isn’t just about accusations; it’s about a refusal to accept inaction, an insistence on accountability.
Normally, the investigation of federal agents and the use of deadly force would fall to the FBI and the Department of Justice’s Office of Civil Rights. But the denial of any wrongdoing by federal officials, coupled with accusations against state leaders of obstructing immigration enforcement, has forced a change of course.… Continue reading
The second group, comprised of corporate leaders and business executives, chooses silence due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, evident in their financial support of Trump. Right-wing media outlets, acting as Trump’s propaganda arms, are driven by a combination of financial gain and genuine hatred of liberals, leading them to defend Trump while demonizing the opposition. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses a range of supporters, including soft supporters with diverse motivations who don’t necessarily view Trump as a savior.
Read More
During a House committee hearing, former special counsel Jack Smith defended his decisions to prosecute President Trump, including the decision to bring charges against him. Smith stated his investigations provided proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” of Trump’s criminal activity. Smith affirmed he would pursue the same course of action regardless of the president’s political affiliation, emphasizing that “no one should be above the law.” These investigations led to unprecedented indictments that were delayed due to Department of Justice policy preventing the prosecution of a sitting president.
Read More
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, defending his decision to prosecute Donald Trump based on evidence of criminal activity related to the 2020 election and attempts to overturn the results. Smith asserted that Trump knew his claims of election fraud were false yet persisted in promoting them to maintain power. He also warned about Trump’s campaign of retribution against those involved in the cases. Smith expressed concern over the state of the rule of law under a second Trump administration, emphasizing its fragility and the need for collective commitment to uphold it.
Read More
During a CNN interview, Kristi Noem defended the actions of an ICE agent who fatally shot Renée Nicole Good, echoing the Trump administration’s stance on enforcing laws. However, when confronted with the January 6th insurrection and Trump’s pardons for the Capitol rioters, Noem struggled to reconcile the administration’s support for federal law enforcement with its tolerance of attacks on officers. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey refuted Noem’s claims about Good’s actions and criticized the Trump administration’s portrayal of the city’s safety. Democrats are advocating for new rules to curb abuses by federal immigration officers, including warrant requirements before arrests, with Senator Chris Murphy expected to introduce legislation.
Read More
The article argues the time has come to take impeachment seriously, noting that numerous House Democrats have already advanced articles against Trump and his cabinet. The author believes the impeachment articles filed thus far are not politically motivated, but rather statements of fact about the current administration’s actions. While some may view impeachment as futile, the author points to recent events and the urgency for Democrats to act. The article concludes by suggesting that Democrats should expose these actions, laying the groundwork for action in the future.
Read More
Murphy: Trump ‘has committed 10 times more impeachable offenses’ in this term, and the sentiment is one of deep frustration. The idea that a president could rack up a multitude of offenses without facing serious consequences is a recurring theme. The perceived ineffectiveness of impeachment as a tool for accountability is a major point of contention, with many feeling it has become a mere formality, a hollow gesture that fails to remove a leader who is widely seen as unfit. The fact that the system seems unable to remove him is a stark illustration of the perceived shortcomings of the existing mechanisms.… Continue reading
The article discusses a concerning trend of undermining the rule of law in America, highlighting actions by the Trump administration that challenge this principle. This includes instances like the FBI excluding a criminal investigative agency from an investigation and Trump’s disregard for legal limits on his power. Additionally, the article points to the Justice Department’s alleged failure to adhere to the law regarding the release of Epstein files. Overall, the author argues that these actions represent an assault on the core tenets of American self-governance.
Read More
Faced with escalating threats and intimidation, numerous federal judges have adapted their lives, often spurred by rulings against the Trump administration and subsequent harsh criticism. These judges report increased harassment, including swatting, bomb threats, and unsolicited pizza deliveries, some of which are suspected to be linked to foreign actors aiming to destabilize the judiciary. To combat the threats, judges have enhanced home security, altered routines, and limited the online presence of their families. Despite these efforts, some judges remain concerned about the impact on their safety, as well as the broader implications for the rule of law and the willingness of future generations to serve as judges.
Read More
Minnesota Judge: ICE Violated Nearly 100 Court Orders
Judge in Minnesota Says ICE Has Violated Nearly 100 Court Orders
It’s pretty clear: a judge in Minnesota has called out ICE for a serious problem, and the numbers are alarming. We’re talking about nearly 100 court orders that ICE has simply disregarded. Think about that for a moment. These aren’t suggestions or friendly requests; these are court orders, the backbone of our legal system, and ICE is, according to this judge, failing to comply. The judge was clear too – “ICE is not a law unto itself.” It seems ICE is operating with a disregard for the legal process.
The judge’s tally, and it’s important to note this, was “hurriedly compiled.”… Continue reading
City Prosecutors to Charge Federal Agents for Alleged Crimes
City prosecutors are stepping up, uniting to bring charges against federal agents, a move that signals a shift in the legal landscape. The core of this action lies in investigating reports of crimes allegedly committed by these agents, highlighting a breakdown of trust and cooperation, particularly with the federal government. This isn’t just about accusations; it’s about a refusal to accept inaction, an insistence on accountability.
Normally, the investigation of federal agents and the use of deadly force would fall to the FBI and the Department of Justice’s Office of Civil Rights. But the denial of any wrongdoing by federal officials, coupled with accusations against state leaders of obstructing immigration enforcement, has forced a change of course.… Continue reading
Aileen Cannon’s Actions Undermine Justice, Critics Say
The second group, comprised of corporate leaders and business executives, chooses silence due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, evident in their financial support of Trump. Right-wing media outlets, acting as Trump’s propaganda arms, are driven by a combination of financial gain and genuine hatred of liberals, leading them to defend Trump while demonizing the opposition. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses a range of supporters, including soft supporters with diverse motivations who don’t necessarily view Trump as a savior.
Read More
Jack Smith: “I Stand By My Decision” to Prosecute Trump in House Testimony
During a House committee hearing, former special counsel Jack Smith defended his decisions to prosecute President Trump, including the decision to bring charges against him. Smith stated his investigations provided proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” of Trump’s criminal activity. Smith affirmed he would pursue the same course of action regardless of the president’s political affiliation, emphasizing that “no one should be above the law.” These investigations led to unprecedented indictments that were delayed due to Department of Justice policy preventing the prosecution of a sitting president.
Read More
Jack Smith: Trump’s Lawbreaking and Revenge Seeking
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, defending his decision to prosecute Donald Trump based on evidence of criminal activity related to the 2020 election and attempts to overturn the results. Smith asserted that Trump knew his claims of election fraud were false yet persisted in promoting them to maintain power. He also warned about Trump’s campaign of retribution against those involved in the cases. Smith expressed concern over the state of the rule of law under a second Trump administration, emphasizing its fragility and the need for collective commitment to uphold it.
Read More
Noem’s Claim of Equal Law Enforcement Under Trump is False, Critics Say
During a CNN interview, Kristi Noem defended the actions of an ICE agent who fatally shot Renée Nicole Good, echoing the Trump administration’s stance on enforcing laws. However, when confronted with the January 6th insurrection and Trump’s pardons for the Capitol rioters, Noem struggled to reconcile the administration’s support for federal law enforcement with its tolerance of attacks on officers. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey refuted Noem’s claims about Good’s actions and criticized the Trump administration’s portrayal of the city’s safety. Democrats are advocating for new rules to curb abuses by federal immigration officers, including warrant requirements before arrests, with Senator Chris Murphy expected to introduce legislation.
Read More
Impeachment: A Futile Effort or a Necessary Step?
The article argues the time has come to take impeachment seriously, noting that numerous House Democrats have already advanced articles against Trump and his cabinet. The author believes the impeachment articles filed thus far are not politically motivated, but rather statements of fact about the current administration’s actions. While some may view impeachment as futile, the author points to recent events and the urgency for Democrats to act. The article concludes by suggesting that Democrats should expose these actions, laying the groundwork for action in the future.
Read More
Murphy: Trump’s Second Term Has Seen Far More Impeachable Offenses
Murphy: Trump ‘has committed 10 times more impeachable offenses’ in this term, and the sentiment is one of deep frustration. The idea that a president could rack up a multitude of offenses without facing serious consequences is a recurring theme. The perceived ineffectiveness of impeachment as a tool for accountability is a major point of contention, with many feeling it has become a mere formality, a hollow gesture that fails to remove a leader who is widely seen as unfit. The fact that the system seems unable to remove him is a stark illustration of the perceived shortcomings of the existing mechanisms.… Continue reading
Trump as King: America’s Slide Into Authoritarianism
The article discusses a concerning trend of undermining the rule of law in America, highlighting actions by the Trump administration that challenge this principle. This includes instances like the FBI excluding a criminal investigative agency from an investigation and Trump’s disregard for legal limits on his power. Additionally, the article points to the Justice Department’s alleged failure to adhere to the law regarding the release of Epstein files. Overall, the author argues that these actions represent an assault on the core tenets of American self-governance.
Read More
Judges Facing Threats: Harassment and Fear After Ruling Against Trump
Faced with escalating threats and intimidation, numerous federal judges have adapted their lives, often spurred by rulings against the Trump administration and subsequent harsh criticism. These judges report increased harassment, including swatting, bomb threats, and unsolicited pizza deliveries, some of which are suspected to be linked to foreign actors aiming to destabilize the judiciary. To combat the threats, judges have enhanced home security, altered routines, and limited the online presence of their families. Despite these efforts, some judges remain concerned about the impact on their safety, as well as the broader implications for the rule of law and the willingness of future generations to serve as judges.
Read More