Military attorneys initially suggested the second strike might be justified if survivors posed a threat. However, the available footage reportedly contradicted this, leaving little room for doubt about the situation. Representative Jim Himes described the killing of the distressed individuals as extremely troubling, emphasizing their inability to continue any mission. While a “kill them all” order was not given, the circumstances surrounding the strike remain highly concerning.
Read More
The article raises concerns regarding the potential for widespread lawlessness within the Trump administration, particularly in light of allegations against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth involving potentially illegal “kill orders.” Should these allegations prove true, they would be a clear violation of federal law, but the author suggests Hegseth may be protected by a presidential pardon, due to Trump’s history of pardoning allies. The author emphasizes that without consequences, there is little incentive for those within the administration to adhere to legal and ethical standards, especially given the historical context of prior presidential pardons and a hyper-partisan climate. The author concludes that the pardon power itself should be amended or eliminated.
Read More
Fears grow inside military over illegal orders after Hegseth authorized follow-up boat strike. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the authorization of a follow-up boat strike by Hegseth has cast a long shadow over the military, sparking deep concerns about the potential for illegal orders and the consequences of blindly following them. The discussions surrounding this situation highlight a serious erosion of trust and a growing sense of unease within the ranks.
The core of the problem seems to be the very nature of the actions themselves. Striking against unarmed boats, regardless of suspicions of drug smuggling, is, at its face, problematic.… Continue reading
Thank you for subscribing to the NP Posted newsletter. You will receive a welcome email shortly, so be sure to check your junk folder if it doesn’t appear in your inbox. The next issue of NP Posted will be delivered to your email address soon. By subscribing, you agree to receive future newsletters from Postmedia Network Inc.
Read More
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has requested a pardon from the country’s president regarding his ongoing corruption trial, aiming to unify the divided nation. Netanyahu, facing charges of fraud, breach of trust, and accepting bribes, argues this move will help in a time of regional change. The request, which has garnered criticism from opponents, has sparked controversy and been met with mixed reactions, with some supporting Netanyahu’s plea, while others believe it undermines democratic institutions. While a pardon is possible, legal experts claim it is rare before a conviction and could threaten the rule of law.
Read More
More than 220 judges rejecting the Trump administration’s mass detention policy is a significant number, and it speaks volumes about the extent to which the policy was deemed problematic. It highlights the widespread concern among the judiciary that the policy was likely an overreach, or perhaps simply unjust. When so many judges, from different jurisdictions and likely with varying political leanings, come to the same conclusion, it’s hard to dismiss it as a fringe opinion or an outlier case. The implication is clear: the administration’s approach to immigration detention, and potentially its broader immigration policies, was seen as excessively harsh, possibly illegal, and certainly not in line with established legal norms.… Continue reading
Nineteen-year-old college student deported despite judge’s order blocking her removal. This situation immediately sparks a series of unsettling questions and reactions, doesn’t it? The core of the matter seems to be a conflict between a judicial order and the actions of immigration authorities, resulting in the deportation of a young woman who was, at least on paper, protected by the court. The immediate reaction is one of disbelief and, frankly, outrage. The idea of a judge’s ruling being disregarded is a fundamental challenge to the rule of law, and it’s hard not to feel that something deeply wrong has occurred.
The judge in this case appears to have ordered that the deportation not happen.… Continue reading
Mark Kelly’s blunt assessment of Pete Hegseth as “totally unqualified” really hits home, doesn’t it? The sheer audacity of the situation, the idea that someone like Hegseth, given his background, could be considered for a position where he would oversee military personnel, is what Kelly found so “ridiculous.” It’s hard to disagree. It seems like the whole thing is just absurd.
Kelly’s comments on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” were a clear indication of how many people feel. While acknowledging the importance of journalists, the Senator pointed out that Hegseth’s background, is not aligned with the requirements of such a high level role.… Continue reading
Recent departures from the Justice Department have illuminated a troubling picture of the agency under the Trump administration, according to former employees. Farewell letters describe a department grappling with compromised ethics, undue pressure, and a toxic atmosphere, with some warning of lasting damage. These departures include those who refused to drop cases for political reasons, whistleblowers, and those who were terminated without explanation. Many attributed their departure to prioritizing loyalty to the president over ethical obligations.
Read More
The current administration, under a president who disregards legal limits, is transforming the presidency into a position of authority that rejects the rule of law. This is evidenced by his threats of violence against those who uphold the Constitution. Federal agents are allegedly conducting unconstitutional raids, creating an environment of fear and undermining due process. The author believes the only appropriate response is impeachment, criminal prosecution, and the unwavering defense of the law, encouraging widespread resistance and support for those working to uphold American ideals.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Kelly Slams Hegseth as “Totally Unqualified,” Calls Criticism “Ridiculous”
Mark Kelly’s blunt assessment of Pete Hegseth as “totally unqualified” really hits home, doesn’t it? The sheer audacity of the situation, the idea that someone like Hegseth, given his background, could be considered for a position where he would oversee military personnel, is what Kelly found so “ridiculous.” It’s hard to disagree. It seems like the whole thing is just absurd.
Kelly’s comments on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” were a clear indication of how many people feel. While acknowledging the importance of journalists, the Senator pointed out that Hegseth’s background, is not aligned with the requirements of such a high level role.… Continue reading