A new poll reveals low public confidence in the impartiality of the Department of Justice and FBI under a second Trump administration, with only about 20% expressing “extreme” or “very” confidence. This skepticism extends to several of Trump’s controversial Cabinet nominees, including those for Attorney General, FBI Director, and Secretary of Defense, who are viewed negatively by a majority of Americans. While some nominees, particularly Robert F. Kennedy Jr., enjoy higher approval ratings among Republicans, significant portions of the public remain unfamiliar with the selected individuals. The poll highlights the challenge Trump faces in restoring public trust in law enforcement and his chosen leadership.
Read More
Trump’s first lie in office was undoubtedly his oath of office. This isn’t merely a provocative statement; it’s a conclusion reached by considering the totality of his character and actions. The very act of swearing to uphold the Constitution, while simultaneously harboring intentions to disregard it, constitutes a profound betrayal of the public trust.
It’s difficult to pinpoint his first lie *ever*, lost somewhere in the mists of his childhood. But focusing solely on his presidency allows a clearer perspective. The oath, a solemn promise before the nation, becomes a blatant falsehood when juxtaposed with his subsequent actions. From the consistent disregard for democratic norms to the blatant attempts to subvert the electoral process, his presidency has been characterized by a pattern of deceit.… Continue reading
The US Supreme Court’s refusal to refer Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice for investigation regarding undeclared gifts and travel highlights a concerning trend: the apparent exemption of high-ranking officials from accountability. The judiciary’s decision, based on Thomas’s amended financial disclosures and the ongoing review of financial disclosure guidelines, leaves many feeling disillusioned. The argument that the updates to disclosure requirements and Thomas’s subsequent compliance render the initial complaint moot raises questions about the effectiveness of self-regulation within the judicial branch.
This decision, communicated through a letter from the secretary to the U.S. Judicial Conference, directly rejects a request from Democratic lawmakers who had argued that Thomas’s actions constituted a willful violation of the Ethics in Government Act.… Continue reading
Trump’s shift from the soaring rhetoric of his campaign promises is a significant development, deserving of closer scrutiny. The stark contrast between his pronouncements on the campaign trail and his more tempered, even contradictory statements post-election reveals a pattern that raises questions about his leadership style and the expectations of his supporters.
The initial promises were bold and often unrealistic. He pledged swift solutions to complex global issues, such as ending the war in Ukraine or resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict within 24 hours. These declarations, though wildly improbable, resonated with a segment of the population craving decisive action.
However, the post-election tone is markedly different.… Continue reading
Money for 9/11 health care was inexplicably dropped from the year-end spending bill, leaving many deeply concerned and frustrated. This omission seems particularly callous, given the sacrifices made by these first responders. The decision to cut this funding raises serious questions about priorities and the value placed on those who put their lives on the line.
The fact that funding for 9/11 health care was slated to run out around 2027, with this extension pushing that date to 2040, highlights the significance of the cut. It’s not just a minor adjustment; it’s a substantial reduction in long-term support for individuals facing serious health issues stemming from their service during and after the attacks.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of contribution. All tips are reviewed and considered for publication. The Daily Beast values its readers’ insights and encourages participation in its journalistic efforts. Confidentiality is respected where requested.
Read More
A bipartisan spending deal passed by the House includes a cost-of-living pay raise for lawmakers—their first since 2009—and an opt-out from the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance requirements. These provisions, slipped into the bill unnoticed, are likely to face criticism; the pay raise is politically sensitive given Congress’s unpopularity, while the Obamacare opt-out could draw opposition from Democrats who were unaware of its inclusion. The pay raise has been sought for years, but its timing may prove detrimental. Republicans have long sought the ACA opt-out, while Democrats remain upset at its clandestine addition.
Read More
Reducing food prices, a key campaign promise, is proving to be far more challenging than initially anticipated. The initial optimism surrounding the ease of lowering grocery costs now seems misplaced, replaced with a more realistic assessment of the difficulty involved.
This shift in tone is significant, especially considering the strong emphasis placed on affordable food during the campaign. The stark contrast between the earlier promises and the current acknowledgment of the inherent difficulty highlights a disconnect between campaign rhetoric and the realities of governing.
The reasons behind this difficulty are multifaceted and complex, going beyond simple pronouncements of ease or hardship.… Continue reading
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s tenure has been marked by highly controversial actions, drawing criticism from across the political spectrum. These include the DOJ’s attempts to prosecute Donald Trump while simultaneously shielding President Biden from similar accusations, the controversial raid on Mar-a-Lago, and the targeting of parents protesting school policies. Further fueling discontent, the DOJ has been accused of ignoring subpoenas, prosecuting political opponents more aggressively than those aligned with the administration, and interfering with investigations into the Biden family. The cumulative effect of these actions has severely damaged public trust in the DOJ and the FBI.
Read More
Democrat Representative Frost’s recent critique of Dogecoin and its association with certain billionaires highlights a concerning trend: the erosion of public trust in government institutions. The representative frames this as billionaires “cosplaying as government officials,” a provocative statement that encapsulates the core issue. This isn’t simply about playful imitation; it’s about a deliberate attempt to reshape the government’s structure and function for the benefit of a select few.
The heart of Representative Frost’s argument lies in the perception of a deliberate strategy to dismantle vital public services. The proposal to drastically reduce government spending, particularly by slashing budgets and personnel, isn’t presented as a necessary measure for efficiency.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood