Danielle Sassoon’s resignation, along with other officials, following an order to drop the Eric Adams case is a stark illustration of the current political climate. The sheer audacity of the order itself raises serious questions about the integrity of the process, leaving many wondering about the motivations behind it. Replacing those who resigned with loyalists seems inevitable, highlighting a concerning trend of prioritizing political allegiance over adherence to the law.
The alternative to resigning – refusing the order – presents a compelling counterfactual. What would have happened if Sassoon and her colleagues had chosen defiance? Would they have faced immediate dismissal, a drawn-out legal battle, or perhaps something far more severe?… Continue reading
Following a federal indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams for evidence destruction and instructing others to lie to the FBI, a Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, Danielle Sassoon, refused an order to drop the case. Sassoon’s letter revealed that the order, issued by Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, was based on a quid pro quo suggested by Adams’ legal team, linking dismissal to assistance with the Department’s priorities. Sassoon, citing a rushed process and the existence of further evidence including obstruction conspiracy, resigned rather than comply. The Justice Department’s subsequent attempts to move the case were thwarted by further resignations.
Read More
Manhattan’s interim U.S. Attorney, Danielle Sassoon, resigned after the Justice Department, under pressure from a Trump-era official, ordered the dismissal of corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The order, issued by Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, cited the need for Adams to assist with Trump’s immigration policies and reelection campaign. This decision, based on political considerations rather than evidentiary strength, prompted concerns among career prosecutors regarding established norms. Sassoon’s resignation followed the directive, though the Justice Department denies requesting it.
Read More
The Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, dropped corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. This decision, detailed in a letter from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, falsely claimed the charges stemmed from the Biden administration. Instead, the dismissal is linked to Adams’ cooperation with the Trump administration’s deportation policies, creating a clear quid pro quo. The charges were dropped without prejudice, leaving the possibility of reinstatement, effectively making Adams beholden to the Trump administration. This act constitutes a severe abuse of power, leaving New York City with a mayor beholden to the federal government.
Read More
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove ordered the dismissal of all corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a decision made without prejudice and potentially subject to future refiling. Bove’s memo suggested the charges were politically motivated, a claim disputed by legal experts. The charges, which included bribery and campaign finance violations stemming from Adams’ time as Brooklyn Borough President, were brought by a Biden-appointed U.S. attorney and will be reviewed upon the confirmation of a Trump-appointed replacement. Adams and his attorney have consistently maintained his innocence.
Read More
Brooklyn real estate developer Erden Arkan pleaded guilty to conspiring with a Turkish consular official to make illegal campaign contributions to Mayor Eric Adams’ 2021 mayoral campaign. Arkan reimbursed employees for donations, enabling Adams to fraudulently obtain public matching funds. Prosecutors presented evidence including recordings and emails demonstrating the conspiracy, alleging that Adams solicited the donations. This plea marks the first guilty verdict in the broader bribery and campaign finance indictment against Adams, who maintains his innocence.
Read More
Federal prosecutors allege the discovery of additional criminal conduct by New York Mayor Eric Adams, expanding upon the initial September indictment of five criminal counts including bribery and conspiracy. The prosecutors’ assertion, made in response to Adams’ request for more details on the charges, cites an ongoing investigation uncovering further involvement by additional individuals. Adams and his attorney, Alex Spiro, vehemently deny any wrongdoing, with Spiro criticizing the prosecution’s actions as a headline grab. The government’s refusal to provide more specifics is justified by concerns of witness tampering.
Read More
Luigi Mangione, accused of murdering United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, pleaded not guilty to state and federal murder charges. His lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, criticized Mayor Eric Adams’s presence at Mangione’s highly publicized perp walk, arguing that the mayor’s actions politicized the case and overshadowed Adams’s own pending corruption charges. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office charged Mangione with first-degree murder, while federal prosecutors added death-penalty-eligible charges. The state-level trial will precede the federal trial.
Read More
New York Mayor Eric Adams’s attempt to dismiss a bribery charge against him has been unsuccessful. This legal setback throws a significant wrench into his administration and raises serious questions about his future. The judge’s decision to reject his motion to dismiss signifies a critical juncture in the unfolding legal drama.
The fallout from this ruling extends far beyond the immediate legal ramifications. It casts a shadow over the mayor’s credibility and leadership, impacting public trust and confidence in his ability to govern effectively. The ongoing investigation and potential trial will undoubtedly dominate headlines for the foreseeable future, creating a challenging environment for Adams to navigate.… Continue reading
As a long-time resident of New York City, the news of Eric Adams being indicted following a federal corruption investigation was not entirely surprising to me. From his shady past as a cop to the questionable actions during his mayoral tenure, there were always red flags that pointed towards his true intentions. Seeing him illegally install cronies and now facing potential criminal charges further solidifies my belief that he was not fit to lead this city.
The fact that he will be the first mayor to be criminally charged while in office is a significant moment in New York City’s history.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker