Federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams have been dropped with prejudice by Judge Dale Ho, meaning the case cannot be reinstated. This decision follows a request from the Department of Justice, supported by a court-appointed friend, citing concerns that the ongoing investigation hampered Adams’ governance and 2025 mayoral campaign. While the DOJ stated the dismissal wasn’t based on evidence strength, Judge Ho’s ruling acknowledged concerns about a potential “bargain” but ultimately lacked the authority to compel continued prosecution. Adams, who maintains his innocence, has apologized to New Yorkers.
Read More
Federal Judge Dale Ho ordered Mayor Eric Adams, his legal team, and Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors to court to explain the DOJ’s request to dismiss corruption charges. This unusual request, prompting the resignation of seven top DOJ prosecutors, has raised concerns about a potential quid pro quo between Adams and the DOJ involving cooperation on immigration enforcement. Judge Ho’s order emphasizes the need for substantial justification for the dismissal, echoing concerns raised in letters from former U.S. Attorneys and legal advocacy groups. Governor Kathy Hochul is convening leaders to discuss potential actions following the resignations of four of Adams’ deputy mayors, suggesting a possible move to remove the mayor from office.
Read More
The Department of Justice, under pressure from Attorney General Bondi and Acting Deputy Attorney General Bove, moved to drop charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. This decision, following the resignations of several federal prosecutors who refused to participate, was explicitly stated to be unrelated to the evidence against Adams. Instead, it is widely seen as a quid pro quo for Adams’ cooperation with the Trump administration’s immigration policies. The dismissal, described by some as an “openly corrupt legal bailout,” could be challenged in court as politically motivated.
Read More
Assistant U.S. Attorney Hagan Scotten resigned from the federal corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams, echoing his predecessor Danielle Sassoon’s concerns about the Department of Justice’s decision to drop the charges. Both prosecutors, who possess conservative backgrounds, criticized the DOJ’s alleged attempt to leverage the prosecution for political gain, specifically for the mayor’s cooperation on immigration enforcement. Scotten’s letter strongly condemned the use of prosecutorial power to influence policy, rejecting any involvement in such actions. The resignations follow reports of a proposed quid pro quo agreement between the mayor’s legal team and the federal government.
Read More
The Justice Department’s dismissal of corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams has triggered a mass exodus of at least six senior officials, including Manhattan’s U.S. Attorney. This unprecedented wave of resignations, surpassing even the 1973 “Saturday Night Massacre” in scale, stems from concerns over political interference in the case. The dismissals, ordered by Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, cited concerns of “weaponization” of the justice system, while resigning officials argued the decision was improper. The controversy draws parallels to past instances of executive overreach and raises serious questions about the independence of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Read More
The upcoming four years represent a pivotal moment for America, demanding unwavering commitment to unbiased news coverage. HuffPost, facing this crucial period, is launching an ad-free experience for contributing supporters. This initiative aims to sustain the platform’s mission of providing free, fair journalism. Continued support is vital to ensuring HuffPost can fulfill its commitment to delivering critical news to the public.
Read More
Danielle Sassoon’s resignation, along with other officials, following an order to drop the Eric Adams case is a stark illustration of the current political climate. The sheer audacity of the order itself raises serious questions about the integrity of the process, leaving many wondering about the motivations behind it. Replacing those who resigned with loyalists seems inevitable, highlighting a concerning trend of prioritizing political allegiance over adherence to the law.
The alternative to resigning – refusing the order – presents a compelling counterfactual. What would have happened if Sassoon and her colleagues had chosen defiance? Would they have faced immediate dismissal, a drawn-out legal battle, or perhaps something far more severe?… Continue reading
Following a federal indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams for evidence destruction and instructing others to lie to the FBI, a Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, Danielle Sassoon, refused an order to drop the case. Sassoon’s letter revealed that the order, issued by Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, was based on a quid pro quo suggested by Adams’ legal team, linking dismissal to assistance with the Department’s priorities. Sassoon, citing a rushed process and the existence of further evidence including obstruction conspiracy, resigned rather than comply. The Justice Department’s subsequent attempts to move the case were thwarted by further resignations.
Read More
Manhattan’s interim U.S. Attorney, Danielle Sassoon, resigned after the Justice Department, under pressure from a Trump-era official, ordered the dismissal of corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The order, issued by Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, cited the need for Adams to assist with Trump’s immigration policies and reelection campaign. This decision, based on political considerations rather than evidentiary strength, prompted concerns among career prosecutors regarding established norms. Sassoon’s resignation followed the directive, though the Justice Department denies requesting it.
Read More
The Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, dropped corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. This decision, detailed in a letter from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, falsely claimed the charges stemmed from the Biden administration. Instead, the dismissal is linked to Adams’ cooperation with the Trump administration’s deportation policies, creating a clear quid pro quo. The charges were dropped without prejudice, leaving the possibility of reinstatement, effectively making Adams beholden to the Trump administration. This act constitutes a severe abuse of power, leaving New York City with a mayor beholden to the federal government.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood