16 Epstein files, including photo of Trump, disappear from DOJ website. The initial buzz is hard to ignore: sixteen specific files, reportedly containing potentially damaging information and a photograph of Donald Trump, vanished from the Department of Justice website. This isn’t just about a few pages being redacted; it’s about whole files, disappearing into the digital ether. The immediate question, of course, is *why*? What was in those files that warranted such a drastic move? And who authorized it? It’s a situation that raises a lot of eyebrows and instantly sparks suspicion.
This is a scenario where the question of “who benefits” immediately springs to mind.… Continue reading
The Justice Department’s website was found to be missing a photo, file 468, from the Epstein files, which included Donald Trump, prompting immediate concerns from lawmakers. This image’s removal was part of a broader issue, as at least 16 files disappeared from the site. The release of documents on Friday only partially satisfied the Epstein Files Transparency Act, leading to potential impeachment hearings for Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche if the full documents are not provided. Lawmakers from both parties, including Rep. Thomas Massie, have accused the DOJ of disregarding the law, demanding a complete and transparent release of all files.
Read More
Republican critics are understandably concerned that the incomplete disclosure of the Epstein files will cast a long shadow over the upcoming midterm elections. The issue is far from settled, and the selective release of heavily redacted documents has done little to quell the controversy. Instead, it has kept the scandal in the media spotlight, raising questions about a potential cover-up and the extent of the alleged wrongdoing.
The fact that the initial release of files was described as incomplete has fueled speculation and mistrust. Many believe that the redactions are extensive and that the released materials are a deliberate attempt to protect certain individuals or conceal the full truth.… Continue reading
Blanche Says Pulling Trump Photo From Epstein File Was Justified. The situation surrounding the Epstein files is complex, and the decision to remove a photo featuring Donald Trump has sparked considerable debate. The core argument offered by Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney General and a former personal attorney for Trump, centers on victim protection. He claims that the removal of the photograph was prompted by concerns raised by victims or victim rights groups about the potential harm caused by its release.
The rationale boils down to this: the Justice Department, acting on the advice of a judge in New York, is obligated to consider the concerns of victims regarding the materials being made public.… Continue reading
Congressmen who pushed to release Epstein files say massive blackout doesn’t comply with law and started work on drafting articles of impeachment, and it’s frankly infuriating. The sheer audacity of the redactions, the extent to which they’ve gone to shield certain individuals, it’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence. It’s not just a matter of concealing information; it feels like they’re actively trying to obstruct justice and protect the perpetrators. We’re talking about a blatant disregard for the law and a cynical attempt to sweep a horrific situation under the rug.
The decision to redact vast swathes of the Epstein files, essentially creating a digital blackout, has been met with immediate and justified outrage, particularly from those who have been vocal about the need for full transparency.… Continue reading
The latest release of Epstein files has prompted a response from former President Bill Clinton, who accused the White House of using him as a scapegoat. Clinton’s statement, released through his press secretary, suggests the timing of the release is an attempt to deflect attention from other issues. The statement emphasizes that Clinton severed ties with Epstein before his crimes came to light, contrasting him with those who maintained relationships afterward. The files, which included photos of Clinton and other public figures, notably did not include any of Donald Trump, prompting scrutiny of Trump’s own connection to Epstein.
Read More
Following the release of the Epstein files, survivors expressed disappointment and skepticism regarding the process, fearing incomplete information and potential redactions. Some believe the Justice Department is not fully complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and are concerned about a slow rollout of information. Human rights lawyers note that redactions may be in place to protect victims, though survivors generally want all evidence exposed. Congressman Ro Khanna has stated the release was incomplete and is looking at options to ensure compliance with the law, while the White House has stated they have been transparent, and will not be holding back any information.
Read More
The Justice Department’s partial release of the Epstein files on Friday, a tactic to try and bury any connection to Trump, was characterized by strategic delays and heavy redactions. Despite promises of a large-scale document release, only a fraction of the files were made available, with many names and details obscured. While the released materials included images of Bill Clinton and other celebrities, Trump’s name was notably absent, though it was reportedly present in the files. Critics, including members of Congress, voiced their outrage over the limited transparency, suggesting a deliberate effort to protect Trump by releasing documents in a staggered manner over the coming weeks.
Read More
The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) recent release of heavily redacted Epstein files has ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly from Democrats, who suspect a politically motivated effort to protect Donald Trump. The released documents, which featured many images of Bill Clinton but none of Trump, have led to calls for the impeachment of top DOJ officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Democrats, like Representative Ro Khanna, are drafting articles of impeachment and are pressuring the DOJ to release the complete files, citing violations of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and a perceived betrayal of Epstein’s survivors. The redacted nature of the files and the omission of Trump, despite his past associations with Epstein, have fueled bipartisan concerns about potential obstruction and manipulation.
Read More
Despite a congressional mandate, the Justice Department’s release of Jeffrey Epstein files proved disappointing for victims. The Attorney General canceled a planned meeting with survivors, leading to further distrust. While some files were released, the DOJ failed to meet the deadline for full disclosure and redacted names, raising suspicions of potential cover-ups and a slow-rolling of information. Lawmakers expressed alarm at the DOJ’s actions, and are considering options for further action.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker