Epstein Files

Manitoba Links US Liquor Sales to Trump Tariffs and Epstein Files Release

This article, compiled by the independent Shopping Trends team, offers insights into current consumer behavior and purchasing patterns. It’s important to note that this team operates separately from CTV News journalists, and their recommendations may generate affiliate commissions through provided shopping links. Further details about the Shopping Trends team’s operations and mission are available for reader review.

Read More

Rogan Claims Trump Started Iran War for Epstein Distraction

On his popular podcast, Joe Rogan suggested that President Donald Trump initiated conflict in Iran as a diversionary tactic, drawing parallels to historical instances of political misdirection. Rogan posited that the timing of the Iran conflict, coinciding with the release of the Epstein files, served to shift public attention away from potentially damaging information. He further voiced concerns about Trump’s decision-making in wartime, citing the president’s age and the perceived betrayal of his “no more wars” platform among some supporters. Rogan also expressed disdain for segments of Trump’s MAGA base, characterizing them as “dorks” influenced by end-times prophecies.

Read More

Joe Rogan Connects Epstein Files to Trump’s Iran War Stance

Podcaster Joe Rogan recently linked President Donald Trump’s stance on the war in Iran to a distraction from the ongoing Epstein files revelations. Rogan, speaking with Arsenio Hall, suggested that initiating conflict in Iran served to divert public attention from the controversial Epstein case, drawing parallels to past political maneuvers. This perspective aligns with a recent poll indicating a majority of voters believe the Iran war was at least partially a distraction from the Epstein files. The article notes that Rogan, despite his past support for Trump, has been critical of his administration’s handling of the Epstein case and other issues he believes are used for misdirection.

Read More

Bondi Faces Congress Subpoena Despite AG Removal Over Epstein Files

Despite Pam Bondi’s departure from the Justice Department, House Democrats assert that a previously issued subpoena compelling her deposition on April 14 regarding the Epstein files remains legally binding. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted to compel Bondi’s testimony, aiming to examine potential mismanagement of the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, the circumstances of Epstein’s death, and compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This continued demand underscores a bipartisan frustration with the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein records, with Democrats forcefully arguing that Bondi must still provide sworn testimony despite her change in position. The committee’s authority to enforce the subpoena, even after Bondi’s ouster, suggests the political fight over these documents is far from over.

Read More

Blanche Says Epstein Files Should Be Ignored by DOJ

The recent pronouncements from Todd Blanche, now reportedly heading the Department of Justice, suggesting that the Epstein files “should not be a part of anything going forward,” have certainly ignited a firestorm of reactions, and for good reason. It feels as though a line has been crossed, not just in terms of bureaucratic procedure, but in a fundamental betrayal of public trust and legal obligation.

The implication that these files, containing potentially damning information about individuals involved in heinous crimes, should simply be swept under the rug is deeply unsettling. The law, as it currently stands, mandates transparency and accountability regarding these documents.… Continue reading

New Epstein Handler Worse Than Bondi

The Department of Justice has reportedly released its Epstein files and made them available to Congress. This development follows voluntary testimony by former Attorney General Bondi and another individual before Congress. Despite these assurances, claims suggest that not all documents pertaining to the Epstein case have been fully disclosed by the DOJ.

Read More

Trump Invites Stranger Questions on Sex Amid Dementia Concerns

During an investor forum in Miami, Donald Trump invited questions from the audience, stating they could ask “anything you want. You can talk sex.” This remark followed a keynote address that largely focused on the Middle East conflict. Trump also referred to the Strait of Hormuz as the “Strait of Trump,” later claiming it was not a slip of the tongue. This incident occurred shortly after reports of U.S. servicemembers being injured in Saudi Arabia and Trump’s declaration that Iran had been “obliterated.”

Read More

Half of Americans Believe Trump Bombed Iran Over Epstein Files

Posters across Washington D.C. have branded Donald Trump’s conflict in Iran as “Operation Epstein Fury,” suggesting a connection between the military action and the controversial Epstein files. This narrative posits that the bombing of Iran, officially “Operation Epic Fury,” was a deliberate distraction from damaging revelations about the President, including allegations of past abuse that emerged just days prior to the military strikes. The theory, while sounding like a conspiracy, has gained traction among a range of political figures and influential media personalities, raising questions about the timing and motivations behind the conflict.

Read More