The Department of Justice (DOJ) is facing potential legal action for missing the deadline to publish all documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, as mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. While the DOJ continues to review and redact files, exceeding the December 19 deadline, officials defend the process citing the need to protect victim information and avoid jeopardizing ongoing investigations. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche suggests established legal precedent supports the DOJ’s actions, and the department will release files on a rolling basis. Lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, are calling for consequences, including lawsuits and contempt proceedings, due to the delay and perceived excessive redactions.
Read More
During the Christmas holiday, Donald Trump engaged in an extensive social media outburst, fueled by his apparent anxiety surrounding the Epstein files. These documents, which he has attempted to suppress, have the potential to expose the depth of his relationship with the deceased financier and his alleged actions. Trump’s base continues to engage in denial, creating narratives of the former president as a hero, while he tries to distract from the truth. The ongoing trickle of information and Trump’s erratic behavior suggests a growing concern that his support base may not be able to continue making excuses for him.
Read More
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has distanced herself from Trump, citing concerns over his focus on releasing redacted Epstein files instead of addressing economic issues. This shift led her to collaborate with Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie to compel the administration to release the files through the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Greene expressed frustration with the prioritization of these files over critical matters like economic stability, cost of living, and healthcare. This disagreement highlights a growing rift within the GOP, which is expected to continue evolving.
Read More
The White House has reportedly seized control of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) X account to manage the fallout from the release of the Epstein files, a move prompted by negative public relations for President Trump. The DOJ’s handling of the files, including problematic redactions and the release of unverified documents, has drawn criticism and calls for accountability, particularly regarding compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act. One instance includes a fake letter that named Trump. Despite the lack of evidence of wrongdoing, the administration is reportedly frustrated by the ongoing controversy and the remaining 700,000 files still to be reviewed.
Read More
The Shopping Trends team, separate from CTV News journalists, focuses on providing insights into consumer shopping patterns. They may earn commissions through affiliate links used in their content. This allows them to offer product recommendations and highlight deals, impacting how consumers make purchasing decisions. Readers are advised to note this potential conflict of interest.
Read More
Representative Ro Khanna has found success in bipartisan efforts by focusing on issues that resonate with both the left and right, such as holding elites accountable. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, a quick success, is an example of his methodology. Khanna’s successes include the Yemen War Powers Resolution and the Chips and Science Act, due to building trust across the aisle and understanding the nuances of Congress. Although not the most bipartisan member, Khanna’s approach focuses on common ground in areas of populist discontent, a modern strategy for building political coalitions.
Read More
The release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s network has become a point of contention, with former President Trump calling for the Department of Justice to release the names of Democrats allegedly mentioned within. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law previously, mandates the disclosure of files, prompting ongoing releases and bipartisan criticism over redactions. The DOJ is reviewing the newly discovered material, but the timeline for further releases remains unclear, and lawmakers are considering further actions.
Read More
The Justice Department has recently released a large volume of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, including over a million newly discovered documents, prompting comments from President Trump. Trump has suggested the Justice Department is spending excessive time on the matter, calling it a “Democrat inspired Hoax” and urging the release of names of prominent Democrats associated with Epstein. Despite the files containing images and references to both Trump and former President Bill Clinton, neither has been accused of wrongdoing. The former president’s spokesperson has pushed for the release of any remaining records mentioning Clinton.
Read More
Representative Jamie Raskin criticized the redactions in the recently released Epstein files, suggesting they are illogical and potentially part of a cover-up. Raskin argued the redactions don’t align with the permissible reasons outlined in the statute, citing a lack of ongoing investigations and national security concerns. He further speculated that the actions of the Justice Department are designed to protect Donald Trump and his associates, possibly related to their connections with Jeffrey Epstein. Raskin stated that Democrats are considering litigation and other potential actions, acknowledging that solutions would require a majority in Congress.
Read More
On Christmas night, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, defending himself against accusations of ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump claimed he dropped Epstein before it was popular, while also calling out the “sleazebags” who associated with Epstein. Trump’s post criticized Democrats and alluded to the unreleased Epstein files, which contain names of individuals. The former president’s statement came despite past comments praising Epstein, with the DOJ still in the process of releasing Epstein-related documents, and the legal deadline already passed.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker