In a closely contested vote, Senate Republicans successfully blocked a Democratic effort to mandate the public release of Jeffrey Epstein’s case files as part of the annual defense authorization bill. The Democrats sought this release, aiming to apply pressure on Republicans and capitalize on public interest in the Epstein case. Senate Republicans argued that this measure was an inappropriate addition to defense legislation, asserting that the Department of Justice has already disclosed many files. Meanwhile, a separate attempt in the House advanced, with a discharge petition gaining support and moving closer to forcing a vote on a similar bill.
Read More
Senate GOP blocks amendment to release Epstein files, and the immediate reaction feels like a deep sigh, a sense of weary resignation. It’s not surprising, is it? The Guardians of Pedophiles, as some are calling them, have once again done what many expect. The amendment, designed to bring transparency to the dark corners surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, was shut down. It’s a move that reinforces a perception, a fear, that the powerful are shielding themselves, regardless of the cost to justice or public trust.
The motivations behind this block are, of course, being fiercely debated. Some suggest that the reluctance to release the files stems from a desire to protect certain individuals, regardless of political affiliation.… Continue reading
The 65th Congress experienced the most closely divided partisan split in House history, with Republicans holding 215 seats and Democrats 214. This narrow margin meant neither party achieved a clear majority following the election. Consequently, the few third-party members held significant influence when the House gathered to select its speaker.
Read More
The publication emphasizes its unwavering commitment to fact-based journalism, highlighting the importance of reader support. This support has been crucial in strengthening the newsroom and navigating challenging periods. Now, the publication seeks continued backing from its audience to sustain its efforts and impact the world. Interested readers are encouraged to become members and contribute to this ongoing mission.
Read More
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer initiated a vote on Wednesday regarding the release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, employing a procedural tactic usually reserved for the majority party. This move, which involves attaching the issue as an amendment to the defense policy package, guarantees a full Senate vote but has drawn criticism from Republicans. According to Republican sources, the move is viewed as hostile, potentially jeopardizing bipartisan negotiations on the defense package. Schumer argues the American people demand the release of the documents, mirroring a House resolution that would compel the Justice Department to release the files within 30 days if passed.
Read More
The Epstein scandal has resurfaced, thanks to the release of a birthday book to the House Oversight Committee, which included a note from Donald Trump. A House measure, led by Representatives Massie and Khanna, seeks to force the Justice Department to release the full Epstein files, facing opposition from Speaker Johnson, but could pass with enough votes. The petition’s success is likely, with two special elections expected to add more supporters, potentially leading to a House vote against Trump. The released materials included graphic content, seemingly linking Trump to Epstein.
Read More
Schumer ambushes Republicans with an amendment to force a vote on the Epstein files. This whole situation feels like a classic political move, doesn’t it? Chuck Schumer, after what seems like an eternity, is suddenly trying to shake things up. He’s attached an amendment to a crucial Defense Authorization bill, aiming to force a vote that would make public all the unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein. It’s a bold move, and the reaction from the Republican side seems pretty predictable – they’re calling it a “hostile act”. Apparently, this could even jeopardize ongoing bipartisan talks.
Now, let’s be honest, is this really an ambush?… Continue reading
House Democrat Dave Min, after reviewing government files on Jeffrey Epstein, believes there are grounds to suspect President Donald Trump’s involvement in wrongdoing, despite disclaimers to the contrary. Min cited numerous connections, including allegations made by a 14-year-old, and the frequent mention of Trump’s name in the documents. He emphasized the need to uncover the truth and called for the release of the unredacted Epstein files, while the White House denies any wrongdoing. The case is further complicated by a birthday letter, allegedly from Trump to Epstein, and a fake check referencing a woman, which were also revealed.
Read More
Following the release of a birthday letter from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, which Congress obtained and the Wall Street Journal published, right-wing figures have largely dismissed its authenticity. Despite initial outrage and denials of the letter’s existence, prominent conservatives, including the White House Press Secretary and Vice President J.D. Vance, are now attempting to discredit the signature, even in the face of evidence. These actions reflect a trend of prioritizing the protection of Trump over addressing any potential connection to Epstein, further exemplified by comments from House Speaker Mike Johnson and MAGA influencers like Charlie Kirk and Benny Johnson. This denial of reality is a familiar tactic, as conservatives continue to downplay the significance of the relationship between Trump and Epstein.
Read More
The House Oversight Committee’s recent release of a birthday message from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein has fueled calls for the release of the remaining Epstein files. Representative McGovern emphasized the need for Congress to compel the administration to release the files, particularly given the unsettling nature of the released correspondence. A bill aimed at achieving this goal is currently supported by all House Democrats, but is still short of the required Republican signatures needed to force a vote on the issue.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood