In a landmark event, hundreds of people participated in the first organized swim in the Chicago River in almost a century, a testament to the remarkable improvements in water quality. The event, a mile-long loop, was made possible by decades of environmental progress, including the Clean Water Act and local efforts to clean up the river. The Chicago River, once a symbol of industrial pollution, has been transformed, allowing for the return of wildlife and the emergence of recreational activities. While this achievement is celebrated, concerns remain about potential rollbacks in environmental regulations that could threaten the river’s health and the progress made.
Read More
The Trump administration is seeking to overturn the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding,” which classified greenhouse gas emissions as a threat and served as the basis for climate regulations. This proposal aims to revoke the government’s authority to regulate pollutants from burning fossil fuels, like carbon dioxide and methane, under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues this move would drive down costs and boost American energy production, while critics express concerns about undermining climate action and benefiting the fossil fuel industry. The EPA is making legal arguments that the previous administration overstepped their authority. This decision faces potential legal challenges and could take years to resolve.
Read More
E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. The news feels like a punch to the gut, a disheartening confirmation of something many have feared: a potential dismantling of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) capacity to address climate change. This potential move is not just a policy change; it’s a fundamental shift with potentially dire consequences.
E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. Some might argue, with a sort of twisted logic, that climate regulations harm human health through higher prices and limited consumer choice. This perspective, however, seems detached from the real-world impacts of inaction.… Continue reading
A proposed rollback of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, requiring large polluters to publicly report emissions, threatens to significantly increase emissions and hinder climate change mitigation efforts. The program’s data, crucial for tracking emissions reductions (over 75% of the overall U.S. decline since 2010), is now at risk, coinciding with EPA cuts to air quality monitoring. This lack of accountability and data, particularly in already underserved communities, makes it harder to address the health impacts of air pollution. Simultaneous funding cuts for air monitoring programs further exacerbate this issue, highlighting the urgent need for continued emission reporting and robust air quality monitoring nationwide.
Read More
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reportedly planning to weaken a crucial rule designed to curb the presence of “forever chemicals,” or PFAS, in our drinking water. This decision has sparked considerable outrage and confusion, with many questioning the motives behind such a move. The proposed weakening of regulations, which previously aimed to establish strict limits on PFAS contamination, raises serious concerns about public health and environmental protection.
This rollback is particularly alarming given the known dangers of PFAS. These chemicals, persistent and resistant to degradation, accumulate in the environment and human bodies, potentially leading to various health problems. The EPA’s own research underscores the significant risks associated with even low levels of PFAS exposure.… Continue reading
The proposed elimination of the Energy Star program by the Trump administration, cloaked under the guise of an EPA “reorganization,” is sparking widespread outrage and concern. This isn’t simply a bureaucratic reshuffling; it’s a direct attack on a program demonstrably beneficial to American households and businesses. The program’s core function—encouraging energy-efficient appliance manufacturing and consumer purchases—has resulted in substantial savings for individuals and reduced strain on the national power grid. The claim of “reorganization” rings hollow in the face of such a significant cut to a program that has, for decades, delivered tangible, positive results.
Eliminating Energy Star directly undermines the financial well-being of American families already struggling with the rising cost of living.… Continue reading
This executive order mandates a “zero-based regulating” approach to energy production regulations, aiming to stimulate innovation and economic growth. Specific agencies are directed to incorporate sunset provisions into existing and new regulations, requiring periodic review and potential rescission by a certain date unless extended. This process will subject regulations to public comment on costs and benefits, ensuring their continued relevance. The order excludes regulatory permitting regimes and clarifies that regulatory expirations will not count towards existing deregulation requirements.
Read More
For a limited time, readers can enjoy unlimited access to high-quality Financial Times journalism across all devices for just $1 over four weeks. This introductory offer then transitions to a standard monthly subscription of $75. Subscribers can cancel at any point during the trial period. The subscription provides complete digital access to the FT’s content.
Read More
An analysis by Food & Water Watch reveals Iowa’s Department of Natural Resources inadequately penalizes factory farms for illegally discharging manure into waterways, resulting in over one million fish deaths from 179 recorded incidents between 2013 and 2023. These spills, totaling up to one million gallons, carry harmful contaminants linked to serious health issues, yet violators paid less than $750,000 in fines. The report highlights a state-wide problem, with a concentration in northwest Iowa, and connects this pollution to elevated cancer rates. This insufficient enforcement, coupled with a lack of monitoring at many large farms, contributes to millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded water cleanup costs annually.
Read More
The offer, seemingly tailored for Elon Musk and similar figures, promises lucrative opportunities to private entities. The plan’s specifics remain undefined, but it may facilitate the expansion of fossil fuel production under Trump’s “Drill, Baby, Drill!” initiative. This could lead to significant profits for those involved while potentially undermining environmental regulations. Musk’s enthusiastic response highlights the potential for significant private sector gains at the expense of essential governmental functions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood