Colombia bans all new oil and mining projects in its Amazon, and that’s a seriously significant development. It’s the kind of decision that makes you sit up and take notice, and honestly, it’s a relief to see a country taking concrete steps to protect such a vital ecosystem. The Amazon is, after all, the lungs of the planet, and its preservation should be a global priority. This move feels particularly impressive given the ongoing challenges faced in the region.
Colombia bans all new oil and mining projects in its Amazon, and it’s understandable why this announcement is garnering attention. This decision seems to have the potential to resonate globally, especially given the increased awareness of environmental issues.… Continue reading
The Trump administration is proposing new rules to weaken the Endangered Species Act, which environmental groups claim will endanger vulnerable species. The Department of the Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service plans to roll back key provisions that had been in place for decades. Environmental groups argue that these changes could allow the government to disregard science and approve projects that destroy habitats, potentially accelerating the extinction crisis and that these revisions would also reduce requirements for other federal agencies to consult with wildlife agencies.
Read More
EPA to withdraw foundation of greenhouse gas rules, sources say, and it’s frankly infuriating. It’s like watching everything you thought was a given, things you learned as a kid even, being systematically dismantled. The idea that regulations meant to protect our planet are being undone for the sake of a few extra bucks in the pockets of those who will likely not even be around to face the consequences is, to put it mildly, disheartening.
The core of this issue seems to be the EPA’s intention to reverse a crucial scientific finding. This finding, the “endangerment finding,” is what provides the legal justification for the major regulations we have in place to deal with climate change.… Continue reading
The Senate parliamentarian has blocked a Republican plan to sell over 3,200 square miles of federal land, a proposal by Senator Mike Lee intended to generate revenue and spur development by transferring public lands to states or other entities. This plan faced opposition from within the Republican party, as well as Democrats and environmental groups, who argue it would harm clean water, wildlife, and public recreation. Senator Lee plans to revise the proposal, potentially limiting sales to land near population centers. The proposal and its opposition highlight a continued debate over the control and use of public lands in the West.
Read More
The Trump Administration to End Protections for 58 Million Acres of National Forests – it’s a headline that’s hard to ignore, isn’t it? It immediately conjures up images of vast, untouched landscapes, and the potential for significant changes that could reshape how we interact with these precious areas. It’s a move that has triggered a strong reaction, and for good reason.
The sheer scale of the decision is staggering. We’re talking about 58 million acres of national forests, a significant portion of the total acreage dedicated to these protected areas. Consider that there are only about 193 million acres of national forest total, and this move suddenly puts a huge chunk up for grabs.… Continue reading
The alarm bells are ringing loudly regarding the potential sale of significant portions of land within Grand Teton National Park and other public lands. The sheer scale of the proposed land sales has ignited a firestorm of concern, with many advocates voicing their belief that such a drastic action would be irreversible.
This isn’t just a localized issue affecting only Wyoming residents; the implications reach far beyond state borders. Grand Teton, like other national parks, attracts tourists and recreation enthusiasts from across the country and the globe. Its economic impact extends far beyond Wyoming’s economy, creating ripple effects that would impact many states and localities.… Continue reading
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to reconsider its ban on asbestos, a known cancer-causing substance. This decision, following an industry challenge, is expected to delay the ban for approximately 30 months, giving manufacturers potentially up to 12 years to phase out its use. This prolonged timeline reflects lobbying efforts from trade groups.
The potential for a weakened or overturned ban on asbestos raises serious concerns about public health. Asbestos exposure has been linked to numerous debilitating and deadly diseases, including mesothelioma, a particularly aggressive form of lung cancer. The prospect of increased asbestos use represents a significant setback in efforts to protect individuals from preventable cancers and respiratory illnesses.… Continue reading
H.R.3346, a bill proposing the abolishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), represents a drastic shift in environmental policy, potentially unraveling decades of environmental protections. The bill’s introduction, sponsored by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), signals a significant challenge to the EPA’s role in regulating various environmental aspects, ranging from air and water quality to toxic waste management. This radical proposal would effectively dismantle the central federal agency responsible for enforcing environmental standards across the nation.
The proposed elimination of the EPA raises profound concerns about the future of environmental regulation in the United States. The agency plays a crucial role in enforcing landmark legislation like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, setting standards that protect public health and the environment.… Continue reading
Climate change is causing significant problems, including rising sea levels threatening coastal communities like Hawaii and melting ice caps leading to increased flooding. Despite warnings from scientists and environmentalists, global responses vary widely; some governments, like the US under Trump, actively undermined environmental protections, while others, like the UK, are pursuing potentially insufficient mitigation efforts. In response, a “Black Box” project in Tasmania aims to document humanity’s actions (or inactions) leading to potential climate catastrophe, serving as a record for future generations and a call to action. Scientists emphasize the urgent need for individuals and governments to reduce carbon footprints to avert disaster.
Read More
The Trump administration’s first 100 days have seen relentless attacks on America’s 640 million acres of federal public lands, jeopardizing a unique national asset. Efforts to boost resource extraction, sell off lands for housing, and purge land management agency staff threaten decades of conservation efforts and bipartisan public support for protecting these lands. This assault utilizes manufactured “emergencies” to justify weakening environmental protections and circumventing public input. The current campaign surpasses previous attempts at privatization in its speed, scope, and disregard for public opinion.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker