X, formerly known as Twitter, has amended its lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), adding Lego, Nestlé, and several other major brands as defendants. The amended complaint alleges these companies participated in a coordinated advertising boycott following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform in 2022, allegedly costing X billions in revenue. The boycott stemmed from concerns over X’s revised content moderation policies and departure from the WFA’s brand safety initiative. X argues this collective action stifled competition and improperly dictated its brand safety standards.
Read More
This Shopping Trends report is editorially independent from CTV News. The team may receive affiliate commissions from purchases made via provided links. Transparency regarding this potential revenue stream is crucial for reader understanding. Full disclosure information is available for review. This ensures unbiased reporting of shopping trends.
Read More
Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s approval, now possesses access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, controlling trillions of dollars in annual transactions. This unprecedented access followed the ousting of a long-serving Treasury official who opposed granting DOGE access. While described as “read-only,” the access encompasses sensitive taxpayer data and could enable Musk to disrupt government funding or manipulate government contracts. Experts warn this situation constitutes a significant threat to governmental integrity and financial stability.
Read More
Senator Ron Wyden is demanding answers from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding a report that Elon Musk’s associates sought access to a highly sensitive Treasury payment system responsible for disbursing trillions of dollars annually. Wyden expressed serious concerns about the potential for politically motivated interference and the severe economic consequences that could result. He highlighted conflicts of interest stemming from Musk’s extensive business ties to China, raising national security risks. The Senator’s letter requests detailed information about any access granted, the rationale behind it, and the security measures in place to prevent breaches.
Read More
Since the 2024 US presidential election, Bluesky has experienced explosive growth, adding over 14 million users to reach 30 million by January 31st. This surge follows significant changes to X (formerly Twitter), including altered blocking features and updated terms of service, prompting many users to migrate. Notable figures like Mark Hamill and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have joined, highlighting Bluesky’s increasing popularity and its similarity to X in design and function. Despite its rapid growth, Bluesky still lags behind established competitors like X and Threads in overall user numbers.
Read More
Newly released Federal Election Commission filings reveal Elon Musk contributed over $290 million to the 2024 election, primarily supporting President Trump and the Republican party, securing significant influence within the new administration. Trump’s political committees also amassed millions, enabling continued political activity despite term limits. Meanwhile, key Senate incumbents in battleground states began stockpiling funds for the 2026 midterms, while the DNC spent heavily on post-election activities. Musk’s super PAC plans to continue its efforts in the 2026 cycle.
Read More
Elon Musk’s team gaining access to the Treasury Department’s payments system is a deeply unsettling development, raising serious questions about the integrity of our governmental processes and the very fabric of our democracy. The sheer audacity of this action, seemingly conducted without the proper oversight or legal authorization, is breathtaking. This isn’t just some minor technical glitch; this is a potential seizure of control over the nation’s financial lifeline.
The implications are staggering. If a private citizen, regardless of their wealth or influence, can unilaterally access and potentially manipulate the core financial systems of the United States government, our checks and balances are demonstrably weak, if not entirely absent.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s extensive involvement with the Trump administration raises significant concerns regarding transparency and potential conflicts of interest. His companies’ substantial government contracts, coupled with his substantial campaign donations, create a unique financial stake in governmental operations. The unexpected departure of a high-ranking Treasury official following resistance to requests to control federal payments, and the placement of Musk allies in key governmental positions, including the Office of Personnel Management, further fuel these concerns. A controversial plan involving mass resignations and potential firings of federal workers, alongside proposed drastic spending cuts, is underway with limited public oversight. The lack of transparency surrounding Musk’s role and influence necessitates a thorough investigation into his actions and their implications.
Read More
The NTSB’s reliance on Elon Musk’s X platform for news updates is deeply troubling. This situation raises serious concerns about the potential for censorship, manipulation, and a blatant disregard for transparency in government operations. The fact that an agency responsible for investigating transportation accidents is now constrained to using a platform owned by a private individual with known political leanings is alarming.
This development effectively places a significant constraint on the NTSB’s ability to communicate directly with the public. Any information released will be subject to the whims of the platform’s owner, raising the specter of information being filtered, delayed, or even suppressed entirely.… Continue reading
Trump’s repeated assertions about election fraud, coupled with Elon Musk’s increasing influence over technology and information, have fueled speculation about a potential connection between the two regarding the 2024 election. The idea that Musk possesses knowledge of or even manipulated “those vote counting computers” is a recurring theme in this discussion.
The notion that Musk could have quietly influenced the election outcome is unsettling. This possibility raises serious concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and the potential for manipulation of voting systems. The lack of transparent oversight regarding access to and control of critical election infrastructure only amplifies these concerns.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood