Electoral Systems

Trump Calls For Taking Over Voting

The idea that “we should take over the voting” is a deeply unsettling prospect, one that suggests a fundamental disregard for democratic processes. When this sentiment is expressed, particularly by prominent political figures, it raises serious questions about the future of electoral systems and the very foundation of representative government. The core of this concern lies in the notion that rather than participating in and trusting established electoral procedures, there’s a desire to exert direct, and potentially coercive, control over how votes are cast and counted.

This isn’t just a casual remark; it appears to represent a mindset where the outcome of an election is predetermined or, at the very least, guaranteed through means that bypass the will of the electorate.… Continue reading

Ranked Choice Voting’s Positive Impact on NYC Elections, Again

Once again, ranked choice voting improved New York City elections. It’s a sentiment that keeps surfacing, and for good reason. Ranked choice voting, or RCV, is proving itself to be a more robust and representative system, particularly when compared to the traditional “first past the post” method still widely used across the United States. While no system is perfect, the benefits of RCV are becoming increasingly clear with each election cycle, specifically in New York City.

The most significant advantage of RCV is its impact on the political landscape. It empowers voters to support the candidate they truly believe in, rather than forcing them into strategic voting scenarios where they have to choose the “lesser of two evils.”… Continue reading