‘Your poll made Trump mad’ is not a valid basis for a lawsuit. That’s the simple truth, no matter how much the former president might wish otherwise. The core issue isn’t about hurt feelings; it’s about establishing legal harm. A lawsuit requires demonstrating actual damage, and simply upsetting a powerful figure, even one known for thin skin, doesn’t meet that threshold. The legal system exists to address tangible harms, not bruised egos.
The fact that Trump won the election further underscores the pointlessness of such a lawsuit. If his victory wasn’t affected by a particular poll, there’s no demonstrable harm to claim.… Continue reading
Missouri Representative Michael Davis introduced the “Donald J. Trump Election Qualification Act,” which would overturn a 2015 law barring felons from holding public office. Inspired by President-elect Trump’s felony conviction, the bill would permit those with felony records to run for office if otherwise eligible. Davis argues this promotes civic reintegration after sentence completion. The legislation directly addresses the apparent contradiction of Trump’s presidential eligibility despite his felony conviction.
Read More
The US Supreme Court denied an emergency appeal from the Republican party to prevent thousands of provisional ballots being counted in Pennsylvania. The justices have upheld a ruling by the state’s Supreme Court that demanded election officials count provisional votes from people whose mailed votes were rejected. The ruling has been welcomed by supporters of voters’ rights, who have forced predominantly Republican-controlled counties to let electors cast a provisional vote at the polls if their postal vote is rejected due to an error. By contrast, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court rejected a last-minute plea by campaigners for voters’ rights to ensure postal votes will still be counted even if they lack an accurate, handwritten date on the envelope.
Read More
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner is suing Tesla founder Elon Musk over his super PAC’s intention to give out $1 million a day to voters in key battleground states in the 2024 election. The case, which initially began in the local Court of Common Pleas, has been moved to a federal court on Musk’s request. Krasner’s attorneys are contesting the transfer, requesting the matter be returned to a state court as the case involves state law issues.
Read More
As a voting precinct manager in DeKalb County, Georgia, I have witnessed firsthand the chaos that ensues when new election rules are passed without proper consideration and planning. The recent ruling by Judge Cox declaring seven election rules passed by the Trump-backed state board as ‘illegal, unconstitutional and void’ is a significant victory for voting rights and democracy.
The rules in question were not only unsupported by Georgia’s Election Code but were also contrary to it. This underscores the importance of upholding fair election practices and ensuring that any changes to voting rules are legal and do not undermine the democratic process.… Continue reading
I must admit, the recent decision by the Supreme Court upholding the ban on a former New Mexico official, Couy Griffin, from running for state office due to his involvement in the January 6 insurrection is a small victory in my eyes. The fact that someone who actively participated in an attack on the U.S. Capitol is being held accountable and barred from holding office within the state is a step in the right direction. This ruling signifies that individuals who engage in acts of sedition and violence should face consequences for their actions, especially when seeking public office.
The distinction made by the Supreme Court, between state and federal offices, is crucial to understanding the implications of this decision.… Continue reading
As a resident of Colorado eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling on former President Donald J. Trump’s eligibility to hold office, I can’t help but feel a mix of anticipation and skepticism. The fact that the justices have expedited their decision-making process ahead of Super Tuesday certainly adds a layer of urgency to the situation. However, given the current political climate and the composition of the Court, it’s hard not to feel a sense of disillusionment.
The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling in December, deeming Mr. Trump ineligible under the 14th Amendment due to his involvement in the insurrection, raised hopes for accountability and justice.… Continue reading
US Supreme Court Justices Have “Strange” Views on Whether Trump is Disqualified
As an observer of the US Supreme Court’s recent oral arguments on whether former President Donald Trump should be disqualified from the ballot, I couldn’t help but notice the “strange” views expressed by some of the justices. While I understand that this topic is one of national significance, the case at hand pertains specifically to Colorado, making it a matter of Colorado’s prerogative to decide on the eligibility of candidates.
The Constitution grants states the right and duty to conduct their own elections, including determining the criteria for appearing on the ballot.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker