Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican candidate for governor, has seized over half a million ballots from a special election, citing an investigation into alleged ballot count discrepancies. County election officials and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, dispute Bianco’s claims, with Bonta calling the action unprecedented and intended to erode public trust in elections. Bianco asserts his “fact-finding mission” is a duty to investigate alleged crime and has “absolutely nothing to do” with his gubernatorial campaign, despite concerns from Democrats about his potential to advance to the general election.
Read More
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, also a gubernatorial candidate, has seized over half a million ballots from a recent special election, citing an investigation into alleged ballot count discrepancies. Election officials and California Attorney General Rob Bonta have publicly disputed Bianco’s claims, with Bonta condemning the sheriff’s actions as unprecedented and potentially undermining public trust in the electoral process. The probe was initiated following a complaint regarding a redistricting measure that passed by a significant margin, a move Bianco claims is unrelated to his campaign.
Read More
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco has initiated an “unprecedented” investigation, seizing over 650,000 ballots from the November election to examine allegations of fraudulent vote counting. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has sharply criticized the probe, stating it lacks factual basis and that evidence overwhelmingly supports the integrity of past elections. Bianco claims his investigation, prompted by a citizens’ group alleging significant vote inflation, aims to either confirm or refute the accuracy of the election results, while Bonta’s office expresses concern over the seizure’s scope and the Sheriff’s department’s lack of election expertise.
Read More
The Department of Justice’s raid on Fulton County election offices signaled a concerning escalation in President Trump’s efforts to undermine election integrity, sparking fears of further interference in future elections. While seizing ballots on Election Day or immediately after is illegal, concerns remain about potential federal overreach, including deploying the National Guard or immigration enforcement. However, election officials are preparing for such scenarios by engaging legal counsel and strategizing responses, bolstered by a recent Supreme Court ruling that may allow candidates to challenge election processes before harm occurs. Ultimately, legal challenges and judicial skepticism toward warrants based on unsubstantiated claims offer a defense against these disruptive tactics.
Read More
The idea of a presidential emergency order specifically designed to seize control of elections is reportedly “being prepared,” according to a key ally. This notion stems from the belief that such an executive action is considered “Plan A” by those pushing for former President Donald Trump to have unilateral authority over electoral processes. The stated justification for this drastic measure is the unsubstantiated claim that foreign entities, specifically China, somehow penetrated and influenced the 2020 election. This line of reasoning is being propagated by individuals known for spreading election denial and conspiracy theories, who assert that Trump is resolute in preventing future elections, such as the upcoming 2026 midterms, from being “stolen.”… Continue reading
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has signaled a clear intention from the Republican party: if Democrats don’t align with the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, Republicans plan to leverage this legislative standoff as a potent weapon in the upcoming midterm elections. This statement effectively frames the situation as a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum, suggesting that opposition to the bill will be met with electoral retribution. The implication is that regardless of the merits or drawbacks of the SAVE Act, its passage or failure will become a central theme for Republican campaigning.
The notion that Republicans would use the SAVE Act as a midterm attack vector, particularly if Democrats refuse to “get on board,” suggests a political strategy focused on manufactured grievances.… Continue reading
The recent pronouncement from a top US intelligence official stating that there are no foreign threats to the upcoming November elections has certainly sparked a lot of conversation, and honestly, it raises more questions than it answers for many. It’s a bold claim, especially given the history of election interference and the current geopolitical climate. The idea that foreign actors are suddenly sitting on their hands when it comes to influencing American elections feels a little, shall we say, convenient.
When you hear that the primary threats are now considered to be domestic, it really makes you stop and think about what that actually means.… Continue reading
Senate Republicans are prioritizing the Save America Act, a bill criticized as a severe voter suppression measure, over pressing national issues. This legislation, falsely premised on widespread non-citizen voting, mandates proof of citizenship and photo ID to register, potentially disenfranchising millions, including Republican-leaning voters. The bill’s requirements to register in person, ending online and mail registration, and mandating the transfer of voter rolls to Homeland Security, would significantly burden citizens and could lead to erroneous purges, despite evidence showing non-citizen voting is not a significant problem.
Read More
While advocating for the SAVE America Act, Mike Johnson asserted that listening to the American people is paramount, citing public opinion as a strong indicator of support for voter identification measures. He claimed that a significant majority, around 70 percent, of Democrats agree with the principle of requiring a photo ID to vote. However, the article points out that instances of election fraud are exceedingly rare, and Johnson’s polling claims do not reflect the specific, stringent requirements of the SAVE Act. This legislation demands in-person reregistration and, in many states, identification beyond a standard REAL ID, such as a passport or birth certificate.
Read More
Senator Chuck Schumer has unleashed a torrent of criticism against the SAVE America Act, branding it as one of the “most despicable” pieces of legislation he has ever encountered. This strong condemnation stems from the belief that the bill represents a deliberate attempt to undermine democratic processes and disenfranchise eligible voters, particularly those from vulnerable communities. Schumer argues that the SAVE America Act is not simply about enhancing election security, as its proponents might claim, but rather a calculated effort to suppress votes and consolidate power through undemocratic means.
The core of Schumer’s argument is that the SAVE America Act functions as a voter suppression bill, intricately designed to erect significant barriers to registration and voting.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood