The idea that “we should take over the voting” is a deeply unsettling prospect, one that suggests a fundamental disregard for democratic processes. When this sentiment is expressed, particularly by prominent political figures, it raises serious questions about the future of electoral systems and the very foundation of representative government. The core of this concern lies in the notion that rather than participating in and trusting established electoral procedures, there’s a desire to exert direct, and potentially coercive, control over how votes are cast and counted.
This isn’t just a casual remark; it appears to represent a mindset where the outcome of an election is predetermined or, at the very least, guaranteed through means that bypass the will of the electorate.… Continue reading
In a stunning turn of events, a Democrat, Taylor Rehmet, defeated the Republican candidate in a special election for a Texas state senate seat, marking the first time in decades that a Democrat has held the position. The election took place in a district that Donald Trump had won by a significant margin in 2024, despite his endorsement and active campaigning for the Republican candidate, Leigh Wambsganss. Wambsganss, supported by prominent Republicans, conceded defeat. The victory for Rehmet, fueled by individual donors, has energized Democrats who see the results as a sign of growing momentum, while many Republicans remain silent on the matter.
Read More
New GOP anti-voting bill may be the most dangerous attack on voting rights ever. It’s a statement that, frankly, is alarming, and deserves a deep dive into the implications of such legislation. The sheer breadth of the proposed changes, if enacted, could fundamentally alter the landscape of American elections. It’s not just about making voting “more secure”; it’s about potentially making it significantly harder for millions of Americans to exercise their constitutional right.
This isn’t about making sure elections are secure. The overwhelming consensus is that voter fraud is exceedingly rare. So, what’s really driving this? The general sentiment is that the GOP is facing an uphill battle to win elections, and rather than adapt their platform to attract a wider base of voters, they are trying to manipulate the system to ensure their continued power.… Continue reading
FBI seizes 2020 ballots in Georgia in apparently unprecedented action, alarming local officials, and that’s the headline, and it’s a real head-scratcher. It’s tough to know where to begin, but the fact that the FBI is taking possession of ballots from the 2020 election cycle in Georgia is definitely something to pay attention to. The reaction seems pretty unified in its alarm. It’s being called “unprecedented”, and that alone raises some serious questions. What’s the justification? What’s the scope of the investigation? What are the potential implications?
If you’re keeping score, consider this: there was a recount in Georgia, twice, after the 2020 election, and Biden actually gained votes.… Continue reading
Governor Gavin Newsom has recently warned that former President Donald Trump intends to run for a third term, despite constitutional limitations. Newsom has stated that he received a Trump 2028 hat, signaling that Trump’s supporters are serious about a potential third term. This isn’t the first time Newsom has voiced such concerns, recalling a past Oval Office conversation where Trump alluded to a third term. Polling data indicates a significant portion of Republicans support the idea of Trump running for a third term.
Read More
Omar, Dems warn midterms may be ‘rigged’ after Bondi demands MN voter rolls is a topic that’s currently sparking intense debate and concern, especially as the midterms approach. There are clear anxieties being expressed about the potential for election interference, with prominent voices raising flags. The core of this worry seems to stem from a perceived pattern of actions and statements that suggest a concerted effort to undermine the integrity of the voting process.
One of the central threads in this discussion involves the demand for voter rolls, specifically the request from Pam Bondi, which has raised many questions. This demand, coupled with anxieties about the security of election equipment software, fuels the suspicion that something is amiss.… Continue reading
The author believes that former President Trump will attempt to steal the upcoming midterms, citing his past attempts to overturn the 2020 election and his ongoing rhetoric questioning the validity of elections. Trump’s actions, including pardoning those involved in the January 6th insurrection and weakening voting safeguards, demonstrate his intent. Furthermore, efforts to suppress voter turnout, like the proposed SAVE Act, are indicative of a concerted effort to manipulate the election’s outcome. The author warns that officials and voters should anticipate interference and take proactive steps to ensure the integrity of the voting process.
Read More
A federal judge in Georgia dismissed a U.S. Justice Department lawsuit against the state seeking voter information, ruling the suit was filed in the wrong location. The Justice Department, which is collecting detailed voting data from various states, can refile the lawsuit. This legal action follows the state’s refusal to provide voter information due to concerns over privacy, with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger citing state law preventing the release of confidential voter data. The issue has become politically charged, with some state Republicans criticizing Raffensperger’s resistance and supporting his primary opponent.
Read More
Despite favorable polling for Democrats in the 2026 midterms, experts warn of potential threats to election integrity. Political scientist Austin Sarat highlights concerns based on former President Trump’s past actions and plans outlined in Project 2025, which aims to influence election outcomes. Democrats, as well as the public, must prepare to prevent potential issues. Additionally, the article emphasizes the emerging risks of AI-generated propaganda campaigns, adding another layer of complexity to the challenges facing democratic societies.
Read More
The author, a former Maricopa County recorder, urges Governor Polis not to pardon Tina Peters. Peters was convicted for violating election laws by allowing unauthorized access to sensitive voting data, betraying the responsibilities of an election administrator. Pardoning her would undermine confidence in election integrity, signal that election administrators are not valued, and potentially embolden future attacks on election officials, particularly by those influenced by figures like Donald Trump. The author emphasizes the importance of allowing the legal process to run its course to maintain the integrity of the election system.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker