The subject in question is attempting to restrict voting access by advocating for one-day in-person voting, a move considered outdated given modern technology. This approach contrasts with Democratic efforts to expand voting through measures like mail-in voting and early voting. The speaker believes this strategy is an attempt to gain an advantage by potentially altering voting laws to favor a specific outcome. Furthermore, a quote from the subject indicates a belief that these restrictions are necessary to prevent Democrats from gaining power.
Read More
Non-credible bomb threats temporarily halt voting in Northern New Jersey. It’s unsettling, isn’t it? The news of these disruptions in northern New Jersey, aimed at polling places, immediately raises eyebrows. The knee-jerk reaction might be, “Here we go again,” especially considering the political landscape of the area. It’s a natural inclination to be wary, wondering if the integrity of the voting process is being targeted. The impact of these threats, even if non-credible, is undeniable.
Non-credible bomb threats temporarily halt voting in Northern New Jersey. The suspicion of manipulation, whether deliberate or circumstantial, inevitably creeps in. The timing of such threats, specifically targeting polling locations, immediately raises concerns about the potential for voter suppression.… Continue reading
Johnson sets record refusing to swear in Adelita Grijalva for 36 days after she won election, and this situation, as it unfolds, really does make you stop and think, doesn’t it? It’s a striking example of a core democratic principle being, shall we say, significantly challenged. We’re talking about a situation where a duly elected official, chosen by the people of her district, is being prevented from taking her seat and representing those same people. This isn’t just a minor procedural hiccup; it’s a direct assault on the very idea of representative government.
The delay, stretching on for 36 days, feels less like a simple administrative pause and more like a deliberate act.… Continue reading
California will dispatch observers to watch DOJ’s election monitors, and it’s a development that immediately sparks a wave of thoughts and reactions, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of headline that makes you stop and consider the layers involved in ensuring a fair and transparent election process. The phrase “who watches the watchmen” pops into mind, a sentiment that seems to be the very core of this move. We’ve reached a point where scrutiny is paramount, and this action by California is a clear indication of that.
This whole situation brings to the forefront the current political climate, and the underlying distrust that exists.… Continue reading
The article details Donald Trump’s ongoing attempts to discredit the electoral process, now specifically targeting both mail-in and early voting methods. Despite previously utilizing these very methods himself and encouraging his supporters to do the same, he is calling for their elimination. Trump is falsely claiming these methods are proof of Democratic cheating, and urging the Justice Department to investigate the 2020 election outcome. These demands come amid record-breaking early voting turnout in several states, including a concerning shift in Republican voter behavior.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom has voiced concern regarding the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) deployment of poll watchers to several California counties, including those requested by the California Republican Party. Newsom suggests this is a prelude to challenging the election results, particularly if Democrats are successful. He further warned of the potential involvement of other federal agencies like ICE and Border Patrol. While local election officials have stated that the presence of election observers is a standard practice, this marks another point of tension between Newsom and the Trump administration, mirroring prior disputes over federal intervention in California.
Read More
Elizabeth Ann Davis was convicted of voter fraud in Colorado for submitting ballots on behalf of her deceased ex-husband and son during the 2022 general election. She was found guilty of two counts of forgery and one count of impersonating an elector. This case highlights the rarity of voter fraud, with the election process in place meant to detect these types of crimes. Davis, who has previous forgery convictions, faces potential penalties ranging from probation to up to three years in prison, with sentencing scheduled for January 9th.
Read More
In a recent advertisement supporting California’s Proposition 50, former President Barack Obama accused Republicans of attempting to “rig the next election” by gaining control of the U.S. House. This ballot measure would allow the state legislature to redraw congressional boundaries, a response to Republican redistricting efforts in other states. Newsom and other Democrats support the move to counter the GOP’s control, while Republicans have criticized it as a partisan power grab. Obama’s endorsement also reflects his broader message on maintaining political and institutional integrity.
Read More
Dominion Voting Systems, a company previously targeted by false claims of election rigging, has been acquired and rebranded as Liberty Vote. Scott Leiendecker, an election technology company founder, purchased the company with the stated goal of restoring public confidence in US elections. Liberty Vote plans to prioritize paper ballots and ensure the company is entirely American-owned, echoing themes promoted by the “election integrity” movement. This change comes amidst President Trump’s calls for election system overhauls, and follows Dominion’s defamation lawsuits against those who spread false claims about the 2020 election.
Read More
Dominion Voting sold to a company run by an ex-GOP election official – let’s unpack this, shall we? The news is hitting hard, isn’t it? It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck, but instead of metal and debris, we’re looking at the foundations of our electoral process. It’s enough to make anyone’s blood run cold. The core issue is this: Dominion Voting Systems, a company that’s become synonymous with controversy surrounding the 2020 election, has been purchased by a new entity, Liberty Vote. And who’s at the helm of Liberty Vote? None other than Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican election official.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood