Election Deniers

Colorado Election Clerk’s Prison Sentence Commuted Amidst Political Pressure

Former Colorado County Clerk Tina Peters, convicted for her role in an election conspiracy scheme, was released from prison after Colorado’s governor commuted her sentence, following pressure from former President Donald Trump. Despite a recommendation for expressed regret, Peters reiterated debunked election fraud claims in an interview, portraying herself as a victim. Her early release, after serving less than a quarter of her sentence, has drawn criticism from Colorado Democrats who fear it will embolden election deniers. Peters plans to focus on her health and family while also pursuing efforts to clear her name and challenge her conviction.

Read More

Colorado Rejects Trump’s Pardon of Election Denier: No Legal Power

Colorado Officials Reject Trump’s ‘Pardon’ of a Convicted Election Denier: The president’s stated intention to pardon Tina Peters, jailed for tampering with election machines in 2020, has set off a legal fight over the extent of Mr. Trump’s pardon powers.

It’s pretty clear cut, really. This whole situation involving Tina Peters and Donald Trump’s attempt to “pardon” her is straightforward. Colorado’s response to Trump’s pardon declaration is a firm rejection, and honestly, that’s where it should end. The Constitution is pretty explicit on this: he can’t. He simply doesn’t have the power to overturn a state conviction. Unless he’s planning a dramatic rescue mission, she’s staying put.… Continue reading

Officials’ Alleged Plan: Trump to Declare 2026 National Emergency, Risking Election “Hijack”

A recent report revealed that Trump’s election integrity official suggested invoking a “national emergency” to justify a federal takeover of state-run election processes for the 2026 election. This proposal comes amidst concerns from voting rights advocates, particularly given the elevation of election deniers within the administration. These individuals, who have pushed false claims of voter fraud, are reportedly aiming to influence election rules and potentially exert more control over the electoral process. The goal is to undermine the independence of state-run elections and potentially shift election outcomes.

Read More