China tells Trump to drop the tariffs, a message echoed by many who see them as economically damaging and strategically flawed. The tariffs, imposed seemingly without a clear, long-term strategy, are hurting not only American businesses but also the global economy. Small businesses are struggling under the weight of increased costs, consumers face higher prices, and the reputation of the United States has suffered as a result of these trade restrictions.
The argument for dropping the tariffs rests on the demonstrable lack of positive outcomes. Where are the promised manufacturing job booms? Major companies like Apple haven’t moved production back to the US, and neither have car manufacturers.… Continue reading
The US’s recent decision to exclude smartphones, computers, and other electronics from reciprocal tariffs is a fascinating development, prompting a flurry of reactions ranging from relief to outright derision. The initial imposition of these tariffs, intended to leverage economic pressure, has clearly backfired, at least in this specific area. The administration’s retreat on this front suggests a significant vulnerability within the US economy’s ability to produce these essential items domestically, forcing a reconsideration of the broader trade strategy.
This exemption highlights a stark reality: the US isn’t currently equipped to manufacture the volume of smartphones and computers consumed domestically, even with increased protectionist measures in place.… Continue reading
Trump tariffs are causing widespread economic anxiety, exemplified by the plight of conservative employees facing potential job losses due to company-wide layoffs. These layoffs are a direct consequence of the economic fallout resulting from the tariffs. The situation highlights the unintended consequences impacting even those who may have supported the policies. This underscores the far-reaching effects of trade policy on individual livelihoods.
Read More
North Carolina beekeeper Jim Hartman, a three-time Trump voter, reveals that presidential tariffs and budget cuts have severely impacted his business, potentially causing over half his annual income to be lost. Increased equipment costs, stemming from tariffs on imported goods, coupled with a sudden halt to federal honey purchases for food banks and schools, have created a significant financial strain. These combined factors forced Hartman to forgo equipment upgrades and employee hiring, highlighting the detrimental effects of government policy on his livelihood. While initially hesitant to assign blame directly to Trump, Hartman expressed concerns regarding the administration’s handling of the situation and its consequences for farmers.
Read More
President Trump’s announcement of a 125% tariff increase on Chinese goods and a temporary 10% reduction for other nations has sparked widespread criticism. This action, predicted by some, follows Trump’s long-standing advocacy for protectionist trade policies, including proposals made during his 2024 campaign. Claims that this drastic tariff increase is unexpected are refuted by Trump’s consistent campaign rhetoric and previous actions. The current economic crisis is thus not a surprise, but rather a foreseeable consequence of Trump’s stated policy goals, intensified in his second term by decreased political constraints and heightened loyalty from within the Republican party.
Read More
President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, including a 104 percent levy on Chinese goods, went into effect, causing significant market turmoil. China retaliated with an 84 percent tariff on U.S. goods, further roiling global markets and triggering a selloff in U.S. Treasuries. The resulting economic downturn included steep losses in Asian and European markets, pushing the S&P 500 toward bear market territory. Despite these consequences, Trump maintained confidence in his economic strategy.
Read More
Tariff tensions are escalating dramatically following the White House’s decision to impose a staggering 104% tariff hike on Chinese goods. This isn’t just an increase; it’s a monumental leap, potentially pushing the total tariffs on Chinese imports well beyond 130% when existing tariffs are factored in. This drastic measure is bound to have far-reaching consequences, impacting not only businesses but also everyday consumers.
The immediate consequence will be a surge in the prices of numerous consumer goods. The “trickle-down” effect, as many are predicting, will likely involve businesses passing increased production costs onto consumers, leading to significantly higher prices in stores.… Continue reading
The Trump White House cited my research to justify tariffs. They got it all wrong. It’s frustrating, to say the least, to see your work twisted to support policies that are fundamentally flawed. My research, which they selectively quoted, never intended to endorse the reckless application of tariffs without a comprehensive industrial policy. The administration’s approach was not just misguided, it was demonstrably incompetent.
Instead of employing a thoughtful strategy, the administration seemed to operate on gut feelings and a lack of understanding of basic economics. They treated tariffs as a silver bullet, ignoring the potential for unintended consequences and the complexities of international trade.… Continue reading
Contrary to former President Trump’s assertions, a trade deficit does not represent an economic loss; it signifies that a nation imports more than it exports. Economists largely agree that trade deficits are not inherently negative, as a country cannot and should not produce all goods domestically. Trump’s focus on eliminating the U.S. trade deficit with China, particularly the $295.4 billion deficit in 2024, stemmed from a misunderstanding of basic economics and was driven by protectionist sentiments. His demands for China to resolve the surplus before tariff negotiations highlighted this flawed perspective.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of EU exports, the European Commission will unveil a list targeting up to €400 billion worth of US goods. This retaliatory measure, to be voted on by member states on Wednesday, initially focuses on the steel and aluminum tariffs, with further action on other tariffs to be considered later. The list, which may exclude certain products such as bourbon following lobbying efforts, aims for a proportionate response while acknowledging the need for a negotiated solution. The EU’s response comes amid global market turmoil and concerns of a potential global downturn.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker