Donald Trump’s victory resulted from a coalition of traditional and non-traditional Republican voters, including a significant number of Latino voters who prioritized economic issues above all else. Trump’s ability to retain this coalition hinges on his capacity to maintain the support of these Latino voters, potentially by taking credit for President Biden’s successful economic policies. Biden’s substantial infrastructure investments, while designed to benefit Trump’s supporters, might ironically bolster Trump’s image. However, Trump’s potential repeal of these policies could jeopardize the very economic growth that fueled his election.
Read More
Analysis reveals significantly stronger economic performance under Democratic presidents compared to Republican presidents in several key areas. Democratic administrations have overseen greater job growth, lower unemployment rates, and faster economic growth. Conversely, ten of the eleven modern-era recessions began under Republican presidencies, often leaving weaker economies for their successors. These trends are attributed to differing policy priorities, with Democrats emphasizing investment in the middle class and small businesses, while Republicans focus on tax cuts primarily benefiting the wealthy.
Read More
Biden’s expressed hope that Trump will reconsider his tariff plan highlights a significant point of contention between the two administrations. The president’s concern centers on the potential negative impact of these tariffs on relationships with key allies, Canada and Mexico. He views such a move as counterproductive, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong ties with these neighboring nations.
The statement reveals a fundamental disagreement over economic policy. Biden clearly believes that escalating trade tensions through tariffs will harm the US economy and its standing on the global stage. His emphasis on the geographical proximity and allied status of Canada and Mexico underscores the perceived folly of imposing trade barriers on such close partners.… Continue reading
Trump’s announced 25% tariff on all Mexican imports is largely viewed as a strategic maneuver, potentially designed to pressure Mexico on immigration. The threat hinges on a false premise: that Mexico is inactive in curbing migration. This deception highlights a pattern of misleading voters regarding Trump’s policies on both tariffs and immigration. Ultimately, the tactic aims to portray any future concessions from Mexico as a personal triumph.
Read More
Stay informed on the 2024 US Presidential election with the FT’s comprehensive coverage, including news, analysis, and data. Access exclusive insights and policy plans through the White House Watch newsletter. Gain deeper perspectives on the election’s impact on democracy through the Democracy 2024 section. These resources offer a complete understanding of the election and its implications.
Read More
Republicans suddenly think the economy’s great, a remarkable shift considering their previous pronouncements. This newfound optimism appears strikingly convenient, coinciding with their current political advantage. It’s a stark contrast to the dire warnings and criticisms they levied just months ago. This rapid change of heart raises questions about the sincerity of their earlier concerns and suggests a potential prioritization of political expediency over genuine economic analysis.
The abrupt change in Republican rhetoric surrounding the economy also raises concerns about their susceptibility to partisan influence. Their opinions seem heavily swayed by whoever occupies the White House, a pattern that underscores a lack of consistent, principled assessment of economic realities.… Continue reading
Following the announcement of a key political appointment, Novavax and BioNTech experienced significant stock drops exceeding 7%, while Moderna reached its 2024 low. Pfizer saw more moderate losses. This market reaction follows the pharmaceutical industry’s substantial campaign donations to both parties, albeit with a greater contribution to Republicans. However, growing investor concern over the potential long-term economic costs of certain policies is contributing to broader market declines.
Read More
While President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs are unwise, they are not unconstitutional, as federal law grants the president significant power to impose them. The Supreme Court, however, has established a “major questions doctrine” that allows it to veto executive branch actions deemed too ambitious. Given the Court’s recent history of using this doctrine to strike down Biden administration policies, it remains unclear whether they will apply it to Trump’s tariffs, potentially setting a dangerous precedent for future presidents. The upcoming legal battle over tariffs presents a dilemma: a ruling against them would further empower an already powerful Court, while a ruling in favor would cause economic hardship for many Americans.
Read More
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, a vocal supporter of President-elect Donald Trump, has endorsed the idea of allowing presidents to influence Federal Reserve policy, reflecting a growing pressure campaign against the central bank’s independence. This follows President-elect Trump’s repeated calls during his campaign to have a say in Fed policy, a departure from the traditional practice of maintaining the Fed’s autonomy to focus solely on the economic health of the United States. Musk’s agreement with Senator Mike Lee’s call to “#EndtheFed” suggests a potential shift in the relationship between the White House and the Federal Reserve under the new administration, echoing the contentious relationship that existed during Trump’s first term.
Read More
Despite President-elect Trump’s campaign promises for tax reform, his true focus remains on delivering massive tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, his signature legislative achievement, exemplifies this, significantly reducing corporate taxes and providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The upcoming expiration of these tax cuts presents an opportunity for Trump to further his agenda by extending these benefits and potentially slashing corporate taxes even lower. These policies would further exacerbate income inequality, inflate the deficit, and strengthen the influence of corporations and wealthy individuals on American politics, ultimately hindering efforts to address pressing issues facing working families.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood