Global wealth inequality dramatically increased in 2024, with the United States leading the surge. The world’s 500 richest individuals gained a combined $1.5 trillion, with a significant portion accruing after the election of Donald Trump, whose net worth nearly doubled. This extreme wealth concentration, particularly among 15 American billionaires exceeding $100 billion, is prompting a re-evaluation of “ultra-high-net-worth” thresholds. Proposed tax cuts by the Republican-led Congress threaten to exacerbate this inequality by further benefiting the wealthiest Americans, while providing minimal relief to lower-income households.
Read More
Despite a history of anti-immigrant rhetoric, President-elect Trump has reversed his stance on the H-1B visa program, prioritizing the needs of wealthy corporations over his base. This policy shift, coupled with planned cuts to social safety nets, reveals a two-tiered approach favoring the rich through tax cuts and tariff exemptions while potentially harming the poor and working class. This prioritization of corporate interests is evident in Trump’s willingness to grant tariff exclusions to companies willing to curry favor, mirroring past behavior. The resulting policy will likely exacerbate economic inequality, benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the vulnerable.
Read More
The election of Donald Trump portends a worsening climate crisis, exacerbating existing challenges. Already, unacknowledged climate risks are causing a massive undervaluation of American properties, reaching trillions of dollars in losses and creating an uninsurable housing market in many areas. This will trigger mass displacement and economic hardship, particularly impacting vulnerable communities. A Trump administration, however, views this not as a problem, but as an exploitable opportunity for predatory industries and political profiteering, jeopardizing any effective climate response.
Read More
The world’s 500 richest individuals now collectively possess over $10 trillion in wealth. This staggering sum is almost equivalent to the combined GDP of Germany, Japan, and India—three of the world’s five largest economies. It’s a truly mind-boggling figure, representing roughly $20 billion per person on the list.
This concentration of wealth prompts a range of reactions. Some find the sheer scale of it almost unbelievable, noting that it would take nearly 2740 years to amass a trillion dollars even if one earned a million dollars every single day. Others point out the absurdity of this wealth, capable of funding a million-dollar-a-day spending spree for over half a century for each individual.… Continue reading
A recent dispute between President-elect Trump’s tech-industry backers and far-right allies over the H-1B visa program highlights a larger issue. Progressive commentators argue that both sides are distracting from the real problem: billionaire CEOs who exploit both American and foreign workers. These CEOs utilize the H-1B program to suppress wages and offshore jobs, benefiting from the program while simultaneously engaging in anti-immigration rhetoric. The debate, therefore, masks the underlying class conflict, with billionaires profiting while workers bear the brunt of exploitative labor practices. Ultimately, the focus should be on combating corporate exploitation, not scapegoating immigrant workers.
Read More
The escalating conflict within the MAGA movement over what’s perceived as American “mediocrity” is revealing a deep fracture within the ranks. It’s not just a disagreement; it’s a full-blown clash of ideologies, exposing the inherent contradictions within the movement itself.
The core of the issue seems to be a perceived gap between the promises of “Making America Great Again” and the reality of the current situation. The question of whether America has truly returned to greatness, or if the vision was even achievable in the first place, is a fundamental point of contention. Some believe the promises were not fully realized, leading to frustration and a sense of betrayal, fueling the internal conflict.… Continue reading
Low-income voters who supported Donald Trump in the recent election now find themselves anxiously hoping he won’t cut their vital benefits. This fear isn’t unfounded; Trump’s history and rhetoric offer little reassurance to those who rely on government assistance programs. The irony is palpable; many of these voters, facing daily struggles to make ends meet, invested their limited resources in supporting a candidate whose policies seem directly opposed to their economic interests.
The narrative pushed by certain media outlets, suggesting that Democrats are solely responsible for any potential cuts, is easily swallowed by some voters. This misinformation cleverly distracts from the reality that Republican policies, especially those championed by Trump, often prioritize tax cuts for the wealthy, potentially at the expense of social safety nets.… Continue reading
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, while promising middle-class benefits, disproportionately favored corporations and high-income earners, increasing the national deficit by $1.9 trillion. The cuts exacerbated existing racial and income inequalities, with Black taxpayers paying higher taxes than similarly situated white taxpayers due to factors like lower homeownership rates. This was achieved through tax advantages biased towards homeownership and stock ownership, areas where Black Americans are historically disadvantaged. Furthermore, the repeal of the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act led to a disproportionate drop in health insurance coverage among low-income individuals, particularly Black Americans.
Read More
Chris Hedges’ assertion that capitalists should be barred from healthcare systems highlights the inherent issue of commodifying essential services. This critique extends beyond healthcare to encompass numerous societal systems – from transportation and food to education and the environment – all negatively impacted by capitalist control. The article argues that addressing individual symptoms, like reforming healthcare, is insufficient; a systemic challenge to capitalism itself is necessary. Focusing solely on healthcare reform while ignoring the broader capitalist structure is akin to fighting a bully while allowing most of his attacks to continue.
Read More
Despite a strong post-pandemic economy exceeding pre-Covid levels, the Biden administration faced electoral setbacks. This economic success, attributed to “Bidenomics,” involved novel policies resulting in positive economic indicators across the board. Central to Bidenomics was the principle of fair economic distribution, ensuring those contributing to the economy receive a proportional share. The administration’s economic approach, originating from a 2009 conversation between Jared Bernstein and then-Vice President Biden, yielded significant positive results worthy of future study and consideration.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood