Billionaires are vehemently opposing a proposed one-time wealth tax on the richest Californians, with some claiming they are fleeing the state to avoid the tax. Critics, like Chamath Palihapitiya and Bill Ackman, have characterized the initiative as an unacceptable seizure of assets. News outlets, such as the Washington Post, have also voiced their disapproval, while reports indicate that some investment firms are establishing new offices outside of California. Supporters of the tax, however, argue that it is a reasonable request for the wealthiest individuals to contribute to mitigate crises facing healthcare, education, and the broader economy, potentially raising approximately $100 billion in revenue for crucial programs.
Read More
The American empire has entered its final act. This feels like a heavy statement, a judgment call on a nation that has, for better or worse, shaped the modern world. It’s difficult to ignore the rumblings, the sense that something fundamental is shifting. The narratives being spun, the media landscape itself, seems to be driving this perspective. The sheer volume of analysis, commentary, and criticism feels overwhelming. This isn’t just about politics, it’s about the very fabric of American society. The challenges are not just political. They’re economic and cultural too. And the core of it is the wealth and power that is concentrated in the hands of so few.… Continue reading
Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, became known for his memorable quotes and witty campaign. During his victory speech, he vowed to protect immigrant communities from ICE and directly challenged Donald Trump’s anti-immigration agenda. Mamdani also addressed Islamophobia, declaring that such rhetoric would no longer win elections in New York City, and embraced his identity as a young, Muslim, democratic socialist. Furthermore, he highlighted his stance on economic inequality, expressing a desire to raise taxes on the city’s wealthiest, and offered a humorous response to the public regarding his choice of silverware while eating a burrito.
Read More
Romney calls for higher taxes on the wealthy in a recent New York Times op-ed, a move that’s certainly generating some buzz, even if it’s coming at a point in his career where he’s no longer wielding the power to legislate. It’s hard not to notice the timing – after decades in the political arena, suddenly advocating for changes that could have been implemented while he held office. It’s the classic, “Now that I’m out, let’s talk about what should have been done all along” scenario.
This shift in stance, from a figure often associated with conservative economics to advocating for higher taxes on the wealthy, is a significant departure.… Continue reading
Mitt Romney, tax the rich, like me. That’s the headline, and it’s a statement that’s sparking a lot of discussion. The core of it seems to be about the idea that the wealthy, including people like Mitt Romney, should pay more in taxes. It’s a message that’s clearly intended to resonate with a public increasingly concerned about wealth inequality.
However, the response is more complicated than just simple agreement. Many people are quick to point out a crucial detail: what about all the opportunities Romney had to actually push for this while he was in office? Why didn’t he introduce legislation to tax the rich more aggressively when he had the power to do so?… Continue reading
Collapse is not a dramatic event, but a slow process of failing systems. It manifests as a lack of basic services, like insufficient heating programs and unreliable power grids, despite their continued existence on paper. Rural communities experience these failures directly, facing frequent outages and unaffordable energy costs, leading them to rely on alternatives. As institutions fail, the demand for resources like firewood increases, highlighting a shift where essential services are no longer guaranteed.
Read More
The Biggest Heist in America Is Being Sold as a Gift to Children. The core concept here, as unsettling as it is, revolves around a system that’s being presented as a charitable gesture while, in reality, it’s a sophisticated form of wealth extraction. The article you referenced speaks volumes. It boils down to a classic tactic: weakening public resources to the point where even a minor offering from the wealthy appears to be a salvation. The article’s point is sharp and clear: The focus should not be on individual investment accounts but on providing fundamental necessities like housing, food, healthcare, and high-quality education.… Continue reading
Senate Republican: ‘We can’t afford’ $2,000 tariff checks. This statement, made by a prominent Republican, cuts right to the heart of a recurring frustration: the perceived mismatch between the stated financial constraints of the government and the actual spending priorities. The simple declaration, “We can’t afford it,” seems to ring hollow when juxtaposed against reports of substantial funding for various other initiatives.
The central point here is the seeming unwillingness to distribute funds directly to the American public, particularly when that money originates from taxes and tariffs paid by those same citizens. This raises questions about the allocation of resources and the priorities of those in power.… Continue reading
Seattle elected Katie Wilson, a community organizer and democratic socialist, as mayor, echoing New York City’s recent mayoral election. Wilson’s victory was attributed to her campaign’s focus on affordability and public safety, in response to rising living costs amid tech company growth. Corporate media outlets, including the Seattle Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post, criticized Wilson’s win and priorities, labeling her policies as anti-business and questioning her ability to govern. These criticisms, especially from Bezos-owned media, highlighted the fear that Wilson’s policies, aimed at addressing income inequality, could gain wider popularity, potentially challenging the status quo.
Read More
Food stamps are back, but millions will soon lose benefits permanently, and this is happening at a particularly bad time for many families. The new law brings back stricter work requirements for parents and older Americans, a move that’s raising serious concerns. It’s hard not to feel a sense of dread when you think about children going hungry because of policies, especially when there aren’t enough jobs to go around. It’s hard not to think that this is simply the politicians’ way of trying to look populist without really considering how people will manage.
It’s clear that the impact of these changes will be deeply felt, especially by those already struggling.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood