White House advisor Peter Navarro projects that President Trump’s tariffs will generate $6 trillion in revenue over the next decade, exceeding any previous US tax increase. Navarro frames this as a tax cut, asserting that foreign entities will bear the cost, while economists largely disagree, anticipating higher prices for American consumers. These tariffs, including a 25% levy on imported cars and additional tariffs on various goods, aim to counteract perceived unfair trade practices. However, Navarro’s calculations remain unclear and depend on several uncertain factors, including consumer purchasing behavior and the ultimate scope of tariff implementation.
Read More
Trump’s proposed “Liberation Day” tariffs could inadvertently trigger the largest tax increase in global history, placing a significant burden on American consumers. The projected cost? A staggering $600 billion annually. This isn’t a mere tax hike; it’s a potential economic earthquake.
The core issue lies in the fundamental misunderstanding of how tariffs actually function. While the stated goal is to protect American industries and reduce reliance on foreign goods, the reality is that these tariffs will be paid by American consumers in the form of higher prices on imported goods. This will directly impact the cost of everyday items, significantly reducing disposable income for most Americans.… Continue reading
Mexico anticipates the potential imposition of 25% tariffs on its goods, viewing a trade war as avoidable and detrimental to both nations. While acknowledging the severity of the drug trafficking problem and the accusations levied by the White House, the Mexican government maintains a calm approach, emphasizing the harm tariffs would inflict on the U.S. economy. President Sheinbaum’s administration, recently inaugurated, has appointed a respected public security minister to address these concerns. Ultimately, Mexico hopes to engage in constructive dialogue with the U.S., despite the current tense atmosphere and the Trump administration’s aggressive tactics.
Read More
The World Bank forecasts a sluggish 2.7% global economic growth in 2019, mirroring the performance of 2019 and representing a significant weakening. This rate, while manageable, is insufficient to elevate living standards globally. The projection reflects concerns over factors such as potential US tariffs, which could severely impact international trade and overall economic health. This subdued growth highlights the fragility of the current economic climate.
Read More
Senator Ron Wyden criticized President-elect Trump’s proposed “External Revenue Service,” arguing it’s a deceptive tactic to mask massive tax cuts for the wealthy funded by increased taxes on families and small businesses. Trump intends to use tariff revenue, potentially collected by a renamed Treasury Department office, to offset the cost of extending 2017 tax cuts. However, analysis shows that resulting price increases from tariffs would outweigh the tax cuts for most Americans, benefiting only the wealthiest 5%. This proposal follows reports that Trump is considering a national economic emergency declaration to justify widespread tariffs.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s threat to impose 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, and his suggestion that Canada become the 51st state, overshadows the significant negative impact these tariffs would have on American consumers. Trudeau highlights that increased costs for goods like oil and gas would harm U.S. citizens, countering Trump’s assertions of trade deficits and Canadian subsidies. Canada has prepared retaliatory tariffs on various U.S. goods should the threat materialize, mirroring previous responses to similar actions. Despite Trump’s claims of U.S. energy independence, Canada remains a crucial supplier of oil to the United States.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright © 2024 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use is governed by their Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The FORTUNE trademark is registered in the U.S. and elsewhere. Note that compensation may be received for certain product links, and offers are subject to change.
Read More
President-elect Trump is considering invoking the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify widespread tariffs on both allies and adversaries, aiming to reshape global trade. This action would grant him broad authority to implement tariffs without needing to demonstrate national security concerns, a feature appealing to Trump. Alternative legal avenues, including sections 338 and 301 of US trade law, are also under consideration, but IEEPA offers a faster route to implementing tariffs. While no final decision has been made, the potential for a national economic emergency declaration is actively being discussed.
Read More
Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Denmark over Greenland is, to put it mildly, perplexing. The very idea of using tariffs as leverage in this situation demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of how tariffs actually function. It’s not as if Denmark is going to suddenly feel the pinch of reduced exports to the US; their share is minimal. Furthermore, targeting Denmark specifically would be incredibly foolish, given its membership in the European Union. This would essentially mean a trade war with the entire EU, a far more significant and damaging conflict than any minor trade friction with Denmark alone.
The notion that imposing tariffs on Danish goods would somehow pressure Denmark to cede Greenland to the US is completely unrealistic.… Continue reading
President-elect Trump’s claim that Gilded Age tariffs spurred economic growth is contradicted by economic historians. While tariffs were a major government revenue source during this period (due to the absence of income tax), research indicates that economic success was despite, not because of, high tariffs. Industries with high tariff protection experienced less productivity and innovation compared to those with less protection. Therefore, tariffs did not contribute to the rise of American manufacturing, and instead likely inflated prices for consumers.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood