In a recent interview, President Trump expressed uncertainty regarding the extent to which due process rights apply to both citizens and non-citizens, stating he was unsure and not a lawyer. He downplayed the likelihood of military intervention to annex Canada, despite previous pronouncements, but remained less certain about Greenland. While pushing back against recession predictions and attributing economic downturn to his predecessor, he also played down the possibility of a third presidential term despite previous suggestions to the contrary. He highlighted his administration’s accomplishments and the continued strength of his political movement.
Read More
President Trump’s prioritization of mass deportations has led to clashes with the judiciary over due process rights for immigrants. He expressed uncertainty about the Fifth Amendment’s applicability, suggesting the required legal processes would be excessively time-consuming. The administration’s actions, including the controversial use of the Alien Enemies Act and the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, have faced Supreme Court rebuke, highlighting a pattern of circumventing established legal procedures. Despite claiming adherence to legal counsel, Trump’s approach has consistently challenged judicial rulings and constitutional protections for immigrants.
Read More
Following a federal judge’s ruling against his use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan gang members without due process, President Trump expressed outrage. The judge, a Trump appointee, determined the act’s application was inappropriate as it requires an actual invasion, not simply a gang presence. Trump vehemently disagreed, claiming the ruling would lead to increased crime and the nation’s demise, further escalating his attacks on judges who oppose his policies. This latest outburst follows previous criticisms of judges who have blocked his deportation efforts.
Read More
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defiantly responded to White House border czar Tom Homan’s criticism of her “Know Your Rights” webinars, which inform constituents of their legal rights regarding immigration enforcement. Homan has threatened to refer Ocasio-Cortez to the Justice Department for potentially impeding deportation efforts, a claim she vehemently rejects. This follows similar accusations against Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers for issuing similar guidance to state employees. Ocasio-Cortez maintains her actions are constitutionally protected and urges constituents to utilize their rights. First Amendment advocacy groups concur that her actions are lawful.
Read More
Despite Democratic efforts to prevent deportations without due process, amendments to a budget bill aimed at barring ICE from such actions, including the deportation of U.S. citizens, failed to pass the House Judiciary Committee. These amendments followed President Trump’s suggestion of sending U.S. citizens to a Salvadoran prison and actual deportations of Venezuelan citizens to that facility without legal proceedings. Democrats criticized Republicans for implicitly supporting the circumvention of Fifth Amendment rights. The rejection of these amendments leaves ICE with the ability to proceed with deportations under the current legal framework.
Read More
The House rejected a Democratic amendment preventing ICE from detaining or deporting U.S. citizens, despite concerns raised by Democrats about the Trump administration’s immigration policies. This follows President Trump’s suggestion of sending U.S. citizens convicted of violent crimes to El Salvador and accusations of deportations without due process. Recent polls show a near-even split in public opinion on the president’s immigration approach, while a Supreme Court ruling emphasized the right to due process before deportation. The budget bill, including the contested funding, is anticipated to pass Congress.
Read More
Donald Trump’s continued freedom and re-election hinge on his exploitation of due process rights, a cornerstone of American jurisprudence. Ironically, his administration actively undermines these same rights for others, exemplified by the mass deportation of immigrants without due process. Trump’s legal team successfully employed delay tactics, leveraging his resources and political standing to postpone trials until after the 2024 election. This contrasts sharply with his administration’s efforts to dismantle due process for non-Trump supporters, creating a two-tiered system of justice.
Read More
The White House is exploring all legal options to expedite deportations, including potentially suspending the writ of habeas corpus for migrants, a measure previously employed by past presidents during national crises. This follows criticism of the administration’s deportation rate, which, while significantly reducing border crossings, has not yet met the ambitious goals set by some conservatives. Press Secretary Leavitt affirmed the administration’s commitment to exploring all legal and constitutional avenues to achieve its deportation objectives. The administration points to a dramatic decrease in border crossings as evidence of its success.
Read More
Approximately 100 mugshots of alleged illegal immigrants, detailing their alleged crimes—including murder and sexual assault—were displayed on the White House lawn. This public display, orchestrated by the Trump administration, highlights their focus on mass deportations, a key campaign promise. The action comes amidst multiple legal challenges to the administration’s deportation practices, with opponents citing concerns about due process violations. The administration counters that it is following due process and faces obstruction from politically motivated judges. These legal battles continue, testing the boundaries of executive power.
Read More
Despite previously supporting Donald Trump, Joe Rogan recently criticized the president’s deportation policies, specifically condemning the lack of due process. He warned that such actions, exemplified by the Abrego Garcia case, set a dangerous precedent, potentially enabling future abuses of power under different administrations. Rogan’s statement sparked a significant debate on social media, with unexpected support from figures like David Axelrod, who echoed concerns about eroding due process safeguards. This shift in Rogan’s stance highlights the controversial nature of the deportation policies and their broader implications.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker