due process

ICE Memo Cuts Bond Hearings for Undocumented Immigrants: Concerns Over Due Process and Constitutional Rights

Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be eligible for bond hearings, according to an ICE memo. That phrase alone should set off alarm bells for anyone concerned about due process and the rule of law. The fact that a memo, a piece of internal communication, can seemingly circumvent the courts and established legal procedures is deeply troubling. It’s as if fundamental rights, carefully enshrined in the Constitution, can be brushed aside with a stroke of a pen.

The implications of this are far-reaching. Without bond hearings, individuals are essentially detained indefinitely while their immigration cases are processed. This raises serious questions about fairness and the potential for abuse.… Continue reading

Judge Restricts DHS Immigration Operations in SoCal, Activists Cite Overcrowding and Due Process Concerns

A Los Angeles federal judge has issued temporary restraining orders against U.S. immigration enforcement, prohibiting agents from detaining individuals based on race, ethnicity, or language. The ruling stems from a lawsuit alleging unlawful “roving patrols” and detentions without reasonable suspicion, requiring detainees to have access to legal counsel. The judge’s decision asserts that government actions have lacked adequate legal basis and appear to be targeting specific communities. The ruling is considered historic by some, while the government has expressed disagreement with the decision.

Read More

Trump-Driven Justice Department Plans Targeting of Naturalized US Citizens

Driven by the Trump administration’s hardline stance on immigration, the Justice Department is targeting naturalized citizens for denaturalization. The department’s memo outlines a focus on individuals who may have committed crimes after becoming citizens, expanding the scope of the law. Critics argue this move is overly broad, potentially allowing the administration to target a wide range of offenses. Historical cases, such as those involving Nazi collaborators, suggest a complex legal process and the importance of due process.

Read More

DOJ Prioritizes Citizenship Revocations, Sparking Fears of Politically Motivated Actions

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is making denaturalization a top priority, directing its attorneys to aggressively pursue cases against naturalized citizens who commit crimes. This initiative will focus on individuals who may have committed fraud or other violations, expanding the criteria for which crimes could result in a loss of citizenship. Immigration experts express serious concerns about the constitutionality of the effort, especially regarding its potential impact on naturalized citizens and their families. The government has indicated that it plans to pursue these cases through civil litigation, raising due process questions and fears of creating a second class of citizens.

Read More

Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Released from Jail, Then Immediately to Immigration Custody

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national facing human smuggling charges, remains in jail as his attorneys and prosecutors debate his potential deportation. A federal judge has ruled for his release, but his attorneys worry about immediate detention by ICE, while prosecutors have expressed an inability to control ICE’s actions. Another federal judge denied a stay of the release order, stating the government’s predicament was “completely of its own making” and they should coordinate with DHS. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for July 16.

Read More

Liberal Justices Slam SCOTUS Majority as Incomprehensible in Immigration Ruling Dissent

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has allowed the Trump administration to resume expedited deportations of immigrants to countries other than their homeland, a move that the three dissenting liberal justices labeled a “gross abuse” of power. The ruling, which lacks any stated rationale from the majority, means immigrants can be deported without prior notice or the opportunity to challenge their removal, potentially exposing them to harm. This decision overturns a lower court’s order that had required migrants to be able to challenge deportations if they felt they may face torture or death. The dissent, penned by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, decried the ruling as “incomprehensible” and “inexcusable,” arguing it rewards lawlessness.

Read More

Masked Men in Border Patrol Vests Assault, Detain California Father

Masked men in Border Patrol vests taking a California father after repeatedly hitting him is a stark and unsettling situation, raising serious questions about authority, accountability, and the very fabric of our society. It’s impossible to ignore the chilling implications of such an event, especially when considering the details surrounding the incident.

The account begins with the chilling detail that the man who was targeted is the father of multiple active and retired US Marines. The fact that a man who has raised children who served the country, and made great sacrifices, was allegedly subjected to this type of treatment adds a particularly heartbreaking layer to the story.… Continue reading

ICE Deported Dozens of U.S. Citizens: Report Reveals Exiling and Human Trafficking Concerns

ICE has deported dozens of U.S. citizens, the report says. This headline immediately grabs your attention, doesn’t it? The very notion of a government agency deporting its own citizens seems utterly contradictory, a fundamental violation of the principles upon which this country was founded. It’s jarring to consider that something like this could happen, and yet, the report confirms it.

The core issue here is the terminology itself. “Deportation” implies sending someone, typically a non-citizen, back to their country of origin. But what happens when the person in question *is* a citizen? The report from Migrant Insider highlights that at least 70 U.S.… Continue reading

Supreme Court Ruling Allows Immigrant Deportation Without Due Process

In a recent order, Republican justices on the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump may effectively bypass laws and treaties protecting immigrants from torture. This temporary order allows the administration to send immigrants to potentially dangerous countries while the *D.V.D.* case is litigated. The administration appears to have exploited a loophole, attempting to deport individuals to countries, such as South Sudan and Libya, where they face a high risk of torture without providing new hearings. Justice Sotomayor dissented, highlighting the potential for a deadly trap, as the administration seems to be intentionally selecting unsafe destinations after immigration hearings have already been completed.

Read More

ICE Detains Many Without Convictions: Data Shows 65% Had No Criminal Records

65% of People Taken by ICE Had No Convictions is a stark statistic that demands attention and reflection. It reveals a reality far removed from the narratives often spun about the nature of immigration enforcement. This isn’t about catching the “worst of the worst,” as some might claim. Instead, it highlights a system that appears to cast a wide net, ensnaring individuals who haven’t been convicted of any crime, or even, in some cases, have had charges dismissed.

The very fact that a significant portion of those detained by ICE lack criminal convictions raises serious questions about the agency’s priorities and tactics.… Continue reading