In Leon County, Florida, 21-year-old U.S. citizen Lopez Gomez, born in Georgia, was arrested and charged under a recently enacted, temporarily enjoined anti-immigration law. Despite presentation of his birth certificate proving his citizenship, a judge ruled she lacked authority to release him. This arrest highlights the disregard for a federal court order and raises concerns about the influence of the president’s disregard for legal processes on local law enforcement actions. The incident underscores potential conflicts between state and federal laws, particularly concerning immigration enforcement.
Read More
Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen was denied access to Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a wrongly deported Maryland resident, at El Salvador’s CECOT prison, despite Republican lawmakers touring the facility and posting photos from inside. Van Hollen cited violations of international law due to the inability to communicate with Abrego Garcia or verify his well-being. The Trump administration defended the deportation, citing domestic violence allegations and alleged gang affiliation, claims disputed by Abrego Garcia’s wife and mother. The White House also emphasized Abrego Garcia’s illegal immigration status.
Read More
Despite a Supreme Court order mandating his release from El Salvador’s CECOT prison, Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains detained. The Trump administration, represented by Pam Bondi, justifies this by citing a dismissed 2021 restraining order, falsely claiming it proves danger to his family. This claim contradicts the wife’s statement that the family reconciled and that Abrego Garcia poses no threat. The administration also continues to falsely allege gang affiliation, lacking credible evidence, while ignoring the mistakenly granted deportation and the severe conditions in CECOT.
Read More
Following his deportation to El Salvador, Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, is contesting the U.S. government’s actions, calling his removal an unjust “abduction.” While she admits to briefly seeking a protective order in 2021 after a marital dispute, she clarifies that the issue was resolved privately and their relationship strengthened. The Department of Homeland Security released these documents, along with claims of gang affiliation, to counter positive media portrayals of Garcia. This deportation, deemed an “administrative error” by DHS, has become a political flashpoint amid President Trump’s deportation policies and a Supreme Court ruling mandating Garcia’s return, which the White House continues to resist.
Read More
Following a Supreme Court ruling ordering the Trump administration to “facilitate” the return of wrongfully deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia from an El Salvadoran prison, a judge has ordered expedited depositions of government officials. This action comes after the administration’s failure to take meaningful steps to secure Garcia’s release, despite admitting the deportation was an “administrative error.” The depositions, scheduled for completion by April 28th, will determine whether the administration acted in good faith. The judge warned against gamesmanship and emphasized the urgency of the situation, highlighting the high stakes involved and the wife’s public plea for her husband’s return.
Read More
The lawyer representing Kilmar Albrego Garcia, a Maryland man wrongly deported to El Salvador, believes a contempt order might be the only way to secure his return. This isn’t simply a legal matter; it speaks to the very foundation of our justice system and the power – or lack thereof – it holds against those who disregard court rulings. The situation highlights a chilling disregard for due process and the rule of law.
Garcia, who had protected status in the U.S. and no criminal record, was accused of gang affiliation by the Trump administration without any evidence. He was arrested, denied legal counsel, and deported to a notoriously brutal Salvadoran prison—all without ever facing a judge or trial.… Continue reading
Nineteen-year-old Merwil Gutiérrez, a Venezuelan asylum seeker in New York City, was mistakenly apprehended and deported to El Salvador’s Cecot prison by ICE agents, despite agents acknowledging their error. His family insists he has no criminal record or gang affiliations, yet he was deported under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a situation mirroring the wrongful deportation of another individual to the same facility. The Gutiérrez family is now without information regarding his status, raising serious concerns about due process and the accuracy of ICE operations. This incident highlights a broader Trump administration push for non-citizen removals, even those without criminal charges.
Read More
Following comments made to reporters, the Trump administration is considering deportation for U.S. citizens convicted of violent crimes. This policy proposal targets individuals deemed “really bad people,” a description lacking specific legal parameters. The legality and practicality of such a measure remain highly contentious given existing constitutional protections for citizens. Further details regarding the criteria for selection and the legal basis for deportation are pending.
Read More
Salvadoran President says he won’t return wrongly deported man back to the U.S. This situation highlights a deeply troubling development in the handling of deportation cases, raising serious questions about due process and the rule of law. The refusal to return a man wrongly deported underscores a breakdown in international cooperation and accountability.
The core issue centers on a legal resident deported to El Salvador despite a Supreme Court ruling deeming the deportation improper. This blatant disregard for a court order points to a larger pattern of circumventing legal processes. The president’s statement that he won’t return the man suggests a lack of willingness to cooperate with U.S.… Continue reading
Early American colonists vehemently opposed Britain’s practice of transporting convicts to the colonies and the subsequent trial of colonial defendants in England. This opposition is reflected in the Declaration of Independence’s grievances and likely influenced the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, including exile. James Madison strongly condemned deportation, even of non-citizens, highlighting the cruelty inherent in such banishment, particularly when considering the loss of property and connections. Given Madison’s views, the prospect of a U.S. government exiling its own citizens would likely have been seen as exceptionally egregious.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood