A federal judge has issued a ruling blocking the administration from deporting non-citizens to third-party countries without affording them due process. This decision stems from a concerning practice where individuals are being sent to countries where they face potential torture or death, without any opportunity to contest their deportation.
The judge’s order directly addresses the administration’s actions, highlighting the lack of legal recourse provided to these individuals. It emphasizes the severity of sending individuals to countries where they are at risk of grave harm, and underscores the violation of fundamental due process rights. The judge’s powerful words—describing the situation as akin to extrajudicial rendition or state-sponsored kidnapping—paint a stark picture of the alleged human rights violations involved.… Continue reading
A federal appeals court, in an opinion penned by conservative Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, has ordered the government to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison after his illegal deportation. The court rejected the government’s claim that it has no responsibility to retrieve Abrego Garcia, highlighting the violation of due process and the potential for unchecked executive power. Judge Wilkinson’s strong rebuke emphasizes the gravity of the situation and warns of the erosion of the rule of law if the executive branch continues to disregard court orders. This decision, particularly from a judge known for upholding executive authority, serves as a significant warning to the Supreme Court and the nation.
Read More
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ denial of the Trump administration’s request for a stay in the Abrego-Garcia case is a significant development, underscoring the court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law. The court’s decision wasn’t merely a procedural ruling; it was a forceful rebuke of the executive branch’s actions. It serves as a stark warning against the erosion of fundamental legal principles and the potential for executive overreach.
The core issue revolves around the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a previous court order prohibiting such action without due process. This deportation was deemed a blatant disregard for legal mandates, a violation of established judicial authority.… Continue reading
The recent case of a U.S.-born man held by ICE under Florida’s new anti-immigration law highlights a deeply concerning trend. This situation underscores the escalating anxieties surrounding the erosion of civil liberties and due process in the United States. The arbitrary detention of a citizen, seemingly based on spurious charges and the mere request of ICE, represents a significant breach of constitutional rights. This isn’t simply about immigration; it’s about the potential for unchecked government power to target anyone deemed undesirable.
The initial reaction to news of the detention has been a mix of disbelief and alarm. Many point to historical precedents, such as the Japanese-American internment camps, to illustrate the dangers of unchecked government power targeting specific groups.… Continue reading
In Leon County, Florida, 21-year-old U.S. citizen Lopez Gomez, born in Georgia, was arrested and charged under a recently enacted, temporarily enjoined anti-immigration law. Despite presentation of his birth certificate proving his citizenship, a judge ruled she lacked authority to release him. This arrest highlights the disregard for a federal court order and raises concerns about the influence of the president’s disregard for legal processes on local law enforcement actions. The incident underscores potential conflicts between state and federal laws, particularly concerning immigration enforcement.
Read More
Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen was denied access to Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a wrongly deported Maryland resident, at El Salvador’s CECOT prison, despite Republican lawmakers touring the facility and posting photos from inside. Van Hollen cited violations of international law due to the inability to communicate with Abrego Garcia or verify his well-being. The Trump administration defended the deportation, citing domestic violence allegations and alleged gang affiliation, claims disputed by Abrego Garcia’s wife and mother. The White House also emphasized Abrego Garcia’s illegal immigration status.
Read More
Despite a Supreme Court order mandating his release from El Salvador’s CECOT prison, Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains detained. The Trump administration, represented by Pam Bondi, justifies this by citing a dismissed 2021 restraining order, falsely claiming it proves danger to his family. This claim contradicts the wife’s statement that the family reconciled and that Abrego Garcia poses no threat. The administration also continues to falsely allege gang affiliation, lacking credible evidence, while ignoring the mistakenly granted deportation and the severe conditions in CECOT.
Read More
Following his deportation to El Salvador, Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, is contesting the U.S. government’s actions, calling his removal an unjust “abduction.” While she admits to briefly seeking a protective order in 2021 after a marital dispute, she clarifies that the issue was resolved privately and their relationship strengthened. The Department of Homeland Security released these documents, along with claims of gang affiliation, to counter positive media portrayals of Garcia. This deportation, deemed an “administrative error” by DHS, has become a political flashpoint amid President Trump’s deportation policies and a Supreme Court ruling mandating Garcia’s return, which the White House continues to resist.
Read More
Following a Supreme Court ruling ordering the Trump administration to “facilitate” the return of wrongfully deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia from an El Salvadoran prison, a judge has ordered expedited depositions of government officials. This action comes after the administration’s failure to take meaningful steps to secure Garcia’s release, despite admitting the deportation was an “administrative error.” The depositions, scheduled for completion by April 28th, will determine whether the administration acted in good faith. The judge warned against gamesmanship and emphasized the urgency of the situation, highlighting the high stakes involved and the wife’s public plea for her husband’s return.
Read More
The lawyer representing Kilmar Albrego Garcia, a Maryland man wrongly deported to El Salvador, believes a contempt order might be the only way to secure his return. This isn’t simply a legal matter; it speaks to the very foundation of our justice system and the power – or lack thereof – it holds against those who disregard court rulings. The situation highlights a chilling disregard for due process and the rule of law.
Garcia, who had protected status in the U.S. and no criminal record, was accused of gang affiliation by the Trump administration without any evidence. He was arrested, denied legal counsel, and deported to a notoriously brutal Salvadoran prison—all without ever facing a judge or trial.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker