President Trump has reportedly directed the Pentagon to explore the use of military force against Latin American drug cartels, potentially escalating U.S. involvement in the region. While details are limited, the order provides a basis for direct military operations, prompting swift condemnation from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who stated that U.S. troop entry is “absolutely ruled out.” This move follows the designation of certain cartels as global terrorist organizations, granting the administration new legal authorities. Experts caution that such military intervention carries significant risks, potentially exacerbating unrest and further destabilizing the region, with potential ties to regime change goals.
Read More
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded to reports that former US President Donald Trump had ordered military action against Latin American drug cartels, asserting that there would be “no invasion of Mexico.” Sheinbaum’s statement followed reports of a directive signed by Trump authorizing military force against cartels, some of which his administration had designated as terrorist organizations. The New York Times reported that this directive would allow for military operations on foreign soil. The Pentagon has yet to comment on the order.
Read More
Trump directs Pentagon to prepare military options to be used against drug cartels designated as terrorist organizations. This is a significant move, one that immediately raises a lot of questions. The idea of using the military against cartels labeled as terrorist organizations conjures images of complex operations, potential for prolonged conflict, and, inevitably, difficult ethical considerations. It’s a situation that demands careful examination.
This directive also highlights a recurring theme: the blurring of lines between military action and other forms of engagement. The language used, like “military operation” rather than “war,” allows for bypassing traditional Congressional oversight. While this approach has been employed by multiple administrations, it still warrants scrutiny because it impacts checks and balances within the system.… Continue reading
The Colombian navy recently seized an unmanned “narco sub” equipped with a Starlink antenna off its Caribbean coast, believed to be a test run by a major cocaine trafficking cartel, which has the capacity to transport 1.5 tons of cocaine. This is not the first instance of Starlink usage by drug traffickers; in November, Indian police seized a meth consignment in a remote-controlled vessel utilizing Starlink. The rise of autonomous subs, described as hard-to-detect and operated with autonomy, reflects a shift towards more sophisticated unmanned systems. The absence of a crew also removes the risk of captured operators cooperating with authorities and makes it difficult to identify the drug lords behind the shipments.
Read More
President Sheinbaum demanded answers from the U.S. regarding the entry of 17 relatives of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán and his son Ovidio, including Ovidio’s mother. Security Secretary García Harfuch suggested this entry indicates negotiations between Ovidio and the U.S. Department of Justice, a theory supported by former HSI head Oscar Hagelsieb, who predicts more such transfers. Analysts believe this relocation is a strategic move, possibly involving cooperation with U.S. authorities in exchange for protection or legal benefits, allowing other family members to continue cartel activities in Mexico.
Read More
A recent diplomatic exchange between Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Donald Trump highlights rising tensions over combating drug cartels. Sheinbaum firmly rejected Trump’s proposal to deploy US troops on Mexican soil, emphasizing Mexico’s inviolable sovereignty. Trump’s offer, while framed as a necessary response to cartel violence, underscores the complex US-Mexico relationship, fraught with trade disputes and security concerns. Sheinbaum’s administration, facing pressure from Trump’s tariff threats, has already increased its own efforts against cartels, albeit while staunchly defending national sovereignty. Despite the strong rhetoric, both sides continue to navigate this sensitive issue within the context of their vital bilateral relationship.
Read More
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum revealed that former U.S. President Donald Trump proposed sending American troops into Mexico to combat drug cartels. Sheinbaum firmly rejected this proposal, emphasizing Mexico’s commitment to national sovereignty. This rejection follows a recent increase in U.S. military presence along the border, despite Sheinbaum’s insistence on collaborative efforts within respective territories. Her statement underscores a potential conflict between the two nations regarding approaches to drug trafficking, despite previous cooperation on other issues.
Read More
Sheinbaum says she rejected Trump’s offer to send troops to Mexico, a decision that sparks a complex debate about intervention, sovereignty, and the long-term consequences of foreign military involvement. The sheer audacity of the proposal – the image of US troops marching onto Mexican soil – raises immediate concerns about national pride and the potential for escalating conflict.
The suggestion itself seems almost cartoonishly simplistic. The cartels are already heavily armed, many with weapons originating in the United States. Sending in more armed forces, even with the best of intentions, could easily backfire, potentially leading to unintended consequences and a further escalation of violence.… Continue reading
Despite increased Mexican cooperation in combating drug cartels, including Operation Frontera’s success in seizing significant quantities of fentanyl, the Trump administration is exploring unilateral military action in Mexico. This consideration includes potential drone strikes, a move that has not been ruled out and would mark the first such action since 1914. However, this approach faces strong criticism, with experts warning of potential damage to U.S.-Mexico relations and arguing that a multi-faceted, collaborative approach is more effective than solely military intervention. The Crisis Group highlights the risk of such actions provoking a negative response from the Mexican government, potentially halting cooperation and undermining efforts to curb fentanyl trafficking.
Read More
The Mexican-American War, resulting in Mexico’s territorial loss, continues to shape Mexican national identity and its relationship with the United States. Current tensions, fueled by trade disputes and perceived U.S. aggression, evoke historical narratives of victimhood and inspire a surge in Mexican nationalism. This nationalistic fervor is evident in boycotts of American products and a renewed emphasis on “Made in Mexico” goods, mirroring the historical reverence for the Niños Héroes, young cadets who symbolized resistance against U.S. invasion. President Sheinbaum navigates a complex political landscape, balancing cooperation with the U.S. while simultaneously fostering national pride and sovereignty.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood