The Trump administration is considering military strikes against drug cartels in Venezuela, including potential targets within the country, as part of a broader strategy to weaken Nicolas Maduro. This comes after a deadly strike on a Venezuelan drug boat, which the administration has framed as the beginning of a larger effort to dismantle drug trafficking and potentially remove Maduro from power. The US has increased its military presence in the Caribbean, deploying warships, aircraft, and personnel near Venezuela, while also labeling Maduro a “narco-terrorist” and increasing the bounty for his arrest. Questions remain about the legal basis for these actions and the ultimate goals of the administration’s approach to Venezuela.
Read More
Violence erupted in Mexico’s senate following a heated discussion concerning the presence of foreign troops. Opposition leader Alejandro “Alito” Moreno initiated a physical altercation with senate president Gerardo Fernández Noroña, escalating to include shoving and grabbing. The incident unfolded after a contentious debate where the ruling party accused the opposition of inviting US military intervention, a claim the opposition denied. In response to the violence, the senate leader plans to propose expelling Moreno and other lawmakers and has filed a criminal complaint.
Read More
The United States is deploying three Aegis guided-missile destroyers to waters off Venezuela to support counter-narcotics efforts. These vessels, including the USS Gravely, the USS Jason Dunham, and the USS Sampson, are expected to arrive soon and will be deployed for several months. This deployment is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to combat drug cartels, which it blames for the influx of illicit drugs into the U.S. and for violence in some U.S. cities. The Venezuelan government, while denying U.S. accusations, has responded with the Venezuelan president announcing the planned deployment of more than 4.5 million militia members around the country.
Read More
Senior administration officials have affirmed that the threat of a military strike on Mexico is not a negotiation tactic but rather a serious consideration contingent on significant changes. Trump and Republican leaders have previously expressed interest in invading Mexico, primarily due to concerns about fentanyl and drug trafficking. Despite this, Mexico has shown resistance, with President Sheinbaum rejecting the idea of U.S. troops entering the country. However, Mexico did recently extradite numerous alleged cartel members to the United States.
Read More
According to administration sources, President Trump has authorized the Pentagon to use military force against Latin American drug cartels designated as terrorist organizations. This directive comes amid heightened tensions with Mexico, with officials suggesting a strike is imminent unless significant changes occur. Despite Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s rejection of U.S. military intervention, Mexico has extradited alleged cartel members to the United States. Experts suggest that the new directive is not limited to Mexican cartels, with increased surveillance and potential for drone strikes.
Read More
US military deploying forces to southern Caribbean against drug groups is the current order of business, and it’s hard not to raise an eyebrow. The official word is a deployment of air and naval forces to address threats from Latin American drug cartels. The question that immediately springs to mind is, why now? What’s the specific threat that warrants such a move?
This kind of action often brings a feeling of déjà vu, especially given the history of the “war on drugs.” It’s a conflict we’ve been fighting for decades, with debatable success. Could this be just another iteration of the same old strategies, or is there something more at play?… Continue reading
President Trump has reportedly directed the Pentagon to explore the use of military force against Latin American drug cartels, potentially escalating U.S. involvement in the region. While details are limited, the order provides a basis for direct military operations, prompting swift condemnation from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who stated that U.S. troop entry is “absolutely ruled out.” This move follows the designation of certain cartels as global terrorist organizations, granting the administration new legal authorities. Experts caution that such military intervention carries significant risks, potentially exacerbating unrest and further destabilizing the region, with potential ties to regime change goals.
Read More
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded to reports that former US President Donald Trump had ordered military action against Latin American drug cartels, asserting that there would be “no invasion of Mexico.” Sheinbaum’s statement followed reports of a directive signed by Trump authorizing military force against cartels, some of which his administration had designated as terrorist organizations. The New York Times reported that this directive would allow for military operations on foreign soil. The Pentagon has yet to comment on the order.
Read More
Trump directs Pentagon to prepare military options to be used against drug cartels designated as terrorist organizations. This is a significant move, one that immediately raises a lot of questions. The idea of using the military against cartels labeled as terrorist organizations conjures images of complex operations, potential for prolonged conflict, and, inevitably, difficult ethical considerations. It’s a situation that demands careful examination.
This directive also highlights a recurring theme: the blurring of lines between military action and other forms of engagement. The language used, like “military operation” rather than “war,” allows for bypassing traditional Congressional oversight. While this approach has been employed by multiple administrations, it still warrants scrutiny because it impacts checks and balances within the system.… Continue reading
The Colombian navy recently seized an unmanned “narco sub” equipped with a Starlink antenna off its Caribbean coast, believed to be a test run by a major cocaine trafficking cartel, which has the capacity to transport 1.5 tons of cocaine. This is not the first instance of Starlink usage by drug traffickers; in November, Indian police seized a meth consignment in a remote-controlled vessel utilizing Starlink. The rise of autonomous subs, described as hard-to-detect and operated with autonomy, reflects a shift towards more sophisticated unmanned systems. The absence of a crew also removes the risk of captured operators cooperating with authorities and makes it difficult to identify the drug lords behind the shipments.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood