Following his election victory, Donald Trump has largely abandoned his campaign promises to address working-class economic concerns, such as grocery and gas prices. His focus has shifted to unrealistic and distracting foreign policy goals, including reclaiming the Panama Canal and purchasing Greenland, while simultaneously planning drastic cuts to federal programs that disproportionately benefit his base. These cuts, driven by his administration’s focus on tax cuts for the wealthy, will likely negatively impact the very people who voted for him. Ultimately, Trump’s post-election actions demonstrate a disregard for his previous commitments and a lack of understanding of the complexities of global economics and political systems.
Read More
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust reporting. HuffPost is committed to providing fearless coverage of the new administration. This critical news will remain freely accessible to all through reader support. Contributions, even creating a free account, help ensure vital information remains unhindered by paywalls.
Read More
Donald Trump’s aggressive rhetoric towards Canada, Greenland, and Panama, while often dismissed as unserious, reveals a potential return to a neo-imperialist American foreign policy. His actions, including threatened tariffs and territorial ambitions, echo past instances of American expansionism driven by economic and strategic interests. This aggressive, disruptive approach, exemplified by his administration’s actions and the support of figures like Elon Musk, aims to exert control over politics, trade, and territory through intimidation and manipulation. Ultimately, this behavior necessitates a strong response from democratic nations to prevent the erosion of global stability and democratic values.
Read More
Despite a conviction on 34 felony counts, Donald Trump received an unconditional discharge, avoiding fines and jail time. This lenient sentence, following numerous delays and appeals, has fueled criticism that the American justice system operates on a two-tiered system favoring the wealthy and powerful. Several incarcerated individuals interviewed expressed outrage at this disparity, highlighting the stark contrast between Trump’s treatment and their own experiences with the legal system. They see the outcome as reinforcing the perception that wealth and influence can shield individuals from consequences. The case underscores existing concerns about unequal justice in America.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith concluded his investigations into Donald Trump, submitting his reports to Attorney General Merrick Garland and subsequently resigning from the Department of Justice. These investigations involved Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election and his mishandling of classified documents. Following Smith’s resignation, the Justice Department is contesting Trump’s efforts to keep the reports sealed. Despite Judge Cannon dismissing the Mar-a-Lago case, the case against Trump’s co-defendants continues. Trump, throughout the process, repeatedly attacked Smith personally and vowed to fire him if re-elected.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith resigned from the Justice Department on January 10th, following the submission of a two-volume report on his investigations into Donald Trump. The report, detailing findings on Trump’s post-2020 election conduct and handling of classified documents, is currently subject to legal disputes regarding its release. Trump’s legal team and co-defendants’ attorneys are attempting to prevent portions of the report’s public dissemination, citing potential prejudice to their cases. The Justice Department has pledged to release the report, but has committed to delaying the public release of the classified documents portion until the relevant case concludes.
Read More
Donald Trump’s presidential campaign employed a “bait and switch” tactic, promising to lower grocery prices and deport millions of undocumented immigrants—pledges subsequently abandoned or acknowledged as unfeasible. His inability to deliver on these promises is overshadowed by a new focus on territorial expansion, diverting attention from broken campaign pledges. This shift in focus aims to complete the deception of voters before he even assumes office, leaving them with four years to contemplate the consequences. The author alleges that Trump’s actions constitute a deliberate swindle of the American public.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election has sparked controversy. Republicans criticized the move as a political stunt, particularly given the refusal to release a related report on Trump’s handling of classified documents. Conversely, some Democrats lauded the partial release but criticized Garland for a delayed investigation. The differing reactions highlight the highly partisan nature of the situation, with Republicans pointing to the unreleased materials from the Biden investigation as a double standard. The release may also embolden future congressional efforts to challenge executive privilege claims.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s broken promises of reviving Youngstown’s economy and the resulting hardship, his popularity in the city has not waned. This unwavering support stems from a deep-seated belief among working-class voters that the political system is rigged against them, a sentiment Trump successfully exploits. Voters feel abandoned by both Democrats and Republicans, seeing Trump’s unapologetic nature as authentic, even if flawed. Ultimately, a desire for radical change, fueled by economic insecurity and perceived political corruption, underpins Trump’s continued success in Youngstown.
Read More
Donald Trump received an unusually lenient sentence of an unconditional discharge for 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, avoiding jail time and fines despite the potential for significant punishment. This outcome has sparked criticism, with legal experts highlighting the stark contrast to sentences received by less affluent individuals facing similar charges. The disparate treatment underscores deep-seated inequities within the criminal justice system, where wealth and race significantly influence sentencing outcomes. This case exemplifies a two-tiered system of justice, where the wealthy receive preferential treatment unavailable to most Americans.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker