Following the national address, President Trump admitted to journalists that he was instructed to give the speech by his chief of staff, Susie Wiles. The address, a rapid-fire delivery of falsehoods and attacks on his predecessor, came shortly after a Vanity Fair profile of Wiles was published. In the profile, Wiles made candid remarks, and it was speculated that Trump’s speech was orchestrated as damage control after the negative press surrounding her. While staff members praised the speech, sources indicated the speech was considered puzzling by allies.
Read More
President Trump delivered a prime-time address that was met with widespread concern over his demeanor, with many viewers perceiving the speech as angry and erratic. The address, which focused on touting his accomplishments and blaming his predecessor for current economic issues, drew strong reactions on social media. Critics, including political commentators and public figures, expressed worry about Trump’s mental state, while some, like California Governor Gavin Newsom, mocked the speech. Furthermore, a Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Trump’s approval ratings on his economic agenda have declined, with a majority of Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy.
Read More
Former Vice President Mike Pence has publicly called for President Donald Trump to remove Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from his position as Health and Human Services Secretary, criticizing Kennedy’s actions regarding the abortion drug mifepristone. Pence’s advocacy group, Advancing American Freedom Foundation, issued a memo echoing this demand. This move sparked significant backlash online, with individuals like Michael Flynn and Jack Posobiec criticizing Pence’s statements and actions.
Read More
According to author Michael Wolff, whispers of concern regarding Donald Trump’s mental state are circulating within the White House following Trump’s controversial reaction to Rob Reiner’s death. Trump’s post on Truth Social mocked the deceased director and his wife, attributing their deaths to “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a move deemed inappropriate by many. Wolff noted that this reaction was not only objectionable, but also indicative of Trump’s alarming personal situation. This insensitive behavior, particularly in the wake of a universally understood tragedy, is expected to be detrimental to the already unpopular former president.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted that the decision to charge President Trump was his, but the foundation for the charges lies solely in Trump’s alleged actions as outlined in the indictments. Smith has faced pressure campaigns from Trump, with one example being the White House’s sharing of a story questioning the FBI’s initial doubts regarding probable cause for the Mar-a-Lago raid. Furthermore, Republicans have inserted a provision in the shutdown deal allowing senators whose phone records were accessed by Smith to sue the Justice Department.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith testified before lawmakers, asserting that Donald Trump’s actions were the foundation for the criminal indictments against him regarding the January 6th insurrection and classified documents. Smith emphasized that the charges stemmed from Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his retention of highly classified documents after leaving office. Smith also defended obtaining phone records of Republican lawmakers, explaining it was necessary due to Trump’s calls to them during the Capitol attack. Democrats praised Smith’s preparedness, while Republicans, who summoned Smith, criticized the investigation as a “political witch hunt.”
Read More
During a closed-door hearing with the House Judiciary Committee, former special counsel Jack Smith stated his team found evidence proving Donald Trump’s “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election results, as well as repeated attempts to obstruct justice regarding classified documents. Smith emphasized that Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after leaving office, storing them in inappropriate locations. Smith’s investigations led to two indictments against Trump, which were later dismissed after Trump won re-election and faced intense scrutiny from Republicans. Smith maintained that his decisions to charge Trump were based on Trump’s actions and were guided by principles of following the law without fear or favor.
Read More
According to portions of his opening statement obtained by the Associated Press, former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith informed lawmakers during a closed-door interview that his team found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump criminally conspired to overturn the 2020 election results. He also stated the team had amassed “powerful evidence” that Trump broke the law by retaining classified documents and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them. Smith emphasized that his decisions were made without regard to Trump’s political affiliations or candidacy, and that he would prosecute a former president based on the same facts regardless of their political party. The private deposition was part of a Republican investigation into Smith’s probes.
Read More
In a closed-door interview, Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted his team found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Donald Trump’s criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results and amassed powerful evidence of obstruction related to classified documents. Smith stated his decisions were made without regard to Trump’s political affiliations or candidacy, and he would have pursued the same course regardless of party. The private deposition before the House Judiciary Committee provided the first opportunity for lawmakers to question Smith regarding the investigations that led to criminal charges against Trump, which were later abandoned due to his reelection.
Read More
During a White House Hanukkah reception, Donald Trump claimed that Israeli-American donor Miriam Adelson offered him $250 million to run for an unconstitutional third term in 2028. This announcement came after Adelson, who was married to billionaire Sheldon Adelson until his death in 2021, spoke with Alan Dershowitz about the possibility of Trump serving another term, prompting chants of “Four more years.” Trump has repeatedly teased the idea of running again, despite the 22nd Amendment, and has received support from the Adelsons, who have long encouraged pro-Israel policies. While Trump has given mixed signals about the possibility, the meeting sparked further speculation on his future political aspirations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker